"Actually I Was the Star": Managing Attributions in Conversation

In this paper, we outline the parameters of a discursive approach to attributions in sport psychology. Attribution theory has had a strong presence within sport and exercise psychology. Attributions are the perceived causes or reasons that people give for an occurrence related to themselves or other...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sara-Jane Finlay, Guy Faulkner
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: FQS 2003-01-01
Series:Forum: Qualitative Social Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/745
id doaj-558a64e659204b38b09ee99d16978948
record_format Article
spelling doaj-558a64e659204b38b09ee99d169789482020-11-25T01:28:26ZdeuFQS Forum: Qualitative Social Research1438-56272003-01-0141732"Actually I Was the Star": Managing Attributions in ConversationSara-Jane Finlay0Guy Faulkner1University of TorontoUniversity of TorontoIn this paper, we outline the parameters of a discursive approach to attributions in sport psychology. Attribution theory has had a strong presence within sport and exercise psychology. Attributions are the perceived causes or reasons that people give for an occurrence related to themselves or others. An attributional model, developed in educational psychology, has been most influential and often requires the researcher(s) or participants to determine the dimensional categorisation of attributions (e.g., internal-external, stable-unstable, controllable-uncontrollable). Assessing attributions in sport and exercise psychology has been almost exclusively through self-report questionnaires and entrenched within a limited theoretical perspective. In contrast, a discursive approach focuses on discourse and what is accomplished through people's talk. Such an approach would advocate a move from a view of talk (discourse) as a route to internal or dimensional categories to an emphasis on talk as the event of interest. Using principles of conversation analysis (CA), a critical examination of the traditional conceptualisation of attributions will be offered in this paper. Drawing on a corpus of data where athletes discuss their sporting performance, we consider the management of attributions as talk-in-action, rather than a series of discrete cognitive elements and dimensions. To illustrate the way that attributions are managed in conversation, we consider three areas—asking questions about loss, the interactional modesty inherent in discussing wins and the "slipperiness" of attributions in conversation. Finally, the implications of a discursive approach to the study of attributions in sport and exercise psychology are discussed. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs030133http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/745attributionsconversation analysissportdiscursive psychology
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sara-Jane Finlay
Guy Faulkner
spellingShingle Sara-Jane Finlay
Guy Faulkner
"Actually I Was the Star": Managing Attributions in Conversation
Forum: Qualitative Social Research
attributions
conversation analysis
sport
discursive psychology
author_facet Sara-Jane Finlay
Guy Faulkner
author_sort Sara-Jane Finlay
title "Actually I Was the Star": Managing Attributions in Conversation
title_short "Actually I Was the Star": Managing Attributions in Conversation
title_full "Actually I Was the Star": Managing Attributions in Conversation
title_fullStr "Actually I Was the Star": Managing Attributions in Conversation
title_full_unstemmed "Actually I Was the Star": Managing Attributions in Conversation
title_sort "actually i was the star": managing attributions in conversation
publisher FQS
series Forum: Qualitative Social Research
issn 1438-5627
publishDate 2003-01-01
description In this paper, we outline the parameters of a discursive approach to attributions in sport psychology. Attribution theory has had a strong presence within sport and exercise psychology. Attributions are the perceived causes or reasons that people give for an occurrence related to themselves or others. An attributional model, developed in educational psychology, has been most influential and often requires the researcher(s) or participants to determine the dimensional categorisation of attributions (e.g., internal-external, stable-unstable, controllable-uncontrollable). Assessing attributions in sport and exercise psychology has been almost exclusively through self-report questionnaires and entrenched within a limited theoretical perspective. In contrast, a discursive approach focuses on discourse and what is accomplished through people's talk. Such an approach would advocate a move from a view of talk (discourse) as a route to internal or dimensional categories to an emphasis on talk as the event of interest. Using principles of conversation analysis (CA), a critical examination of the traditional conceptualisation of attributions will be offered in this paper. Drawing on a corpus of data where athletes discuss their sporting performance, we consider the management of attributions as talk-in-action, rather than a series of discrete cognitive elements and dimensions. To illustrate the way that attributions are managed in conversation, we consider three areas—asking questions about loss, the interactional modesty inherent in discussing wins and the "slipperiness" of attributions in conversation. Finally, the implications of a discursive approach to the study of attributions in sport and exercise psychology are discussed. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs030133
topic attributions
conversation analysis
sport
discursive psychology
url http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/745
work_keys_str_mv AT sarajanefinlay actuallyiwasthestarmanagingattributionsinconversation
AT guyfaulkner actuallyiwasthestarmanagingattributionsinconversation
_version_ 1725101719820435456