Empiric treatment against invasive fungal diseases in febrile neutropenic patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Abstract Background The most optimal antifungal agent for empiric treatment of invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) in febrile neutropenia is controversial. Our objective was evaluate the relative efficacy of antifungals for all-cause mortality, fungal infection-related mortality and treatment response i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ken Chen, Qi Wang, Roy A. Pleasants, Long Ge, Wei Liu, Kangning Peng, Suodi Zhai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-02-01
Series:BMC Infectious Diseases
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12879-017-2263-6
id doaj-558f0a525fe64d30a4e4e9a78f6be858
record_format Article
spelling doaj-558f0a525fe64d30a4e4e9a78f6be8582020-11-25T03:41:36ZengBMCBMC Infectious Diseases1471-23342017-02-0117111210.1186/s12879-017-2263-6Empiric treatment against invasive fungal diseases in febrile neutropenic patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysisKen Chen0Qi Wang1Roy A. Pleasants2Long Ge3Wei Liu4Kangning Peng5Suodi Zhai6Department of Pharmacy, Peking University Third HospitalEvidence Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou UniversityDuke University Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Duke University School of MedicineEvidence Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou UniversityDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University Third HospitalSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University Health Science CenterDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University Third HospitalAbstract Background The most optimal antifungal agent for empiric treatment of invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) in febrile neutropenia is controversial. Our objective was evaluate the relative efficacy of antifungals for all-cause mortality, fungal infection-related mortality and treatment response in this population. Methods Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Two reviewers performed the quality assessment and extracted data independently. Pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis were conducted to compare the antifungals. Results Seventeen RCTs involving 4583 patients were included. Risk of bias of included studies was moderate. Pairwise meta-analysis indicated the treatment response rate of itraconazole was significantly better than conventional amphotericin B (RR = 1.33, 95%CI 1.10–1.61). Network meta-analysis showed that amphotericin B lipid complex, conventional amphotericin B, liposomal amphotericin B, itraconazole and voriconazole had a significantly lower rate of fungal infection-related mortality than no antifungal treatment. Other differences in outcomes among antifungals were not statistically significant. From the rank probability plot, caspofungin appeared to be the most effective agent for all-cause mortality and fungal infection-related mortality, whereas micafungin tended to be superior for treatment response. The results were stable after excluding RCTs with high risk of bias, whereas micafungin had the lowest fungal infection-related mortality. Conclusions Our results highlighted the necessity of empiric antifungal treatment and indicates that echinocandins appeared to be the most effective agents for empiric treatment of febrile neutropenic patients based on mortality and treatment response. However, more studies are needed to determine the best antifungal agent for empiric treatment. Our systematic review has been prospectively registered in PROSPERO and the registration number was CRD42015026629.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12879-017-2263-6AntifungalsFebrile neutropeniaEmpiric therapySystematic reviewNetwork meta-analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ken Chen
Qi Wang
Roy A. Pleasants
Long Ge
Wei Liu
Kangning Peng
Suodi Zhai
spellingShingle Ken Chen
Qi Wang
Roy A. Pleasants
Long Ge
Wei Liu
Kangning Peng
Suodi Zhai
Empiric treatment against invasive fungal diseases in febrile neutropenic patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
BMC Infectious Diseases
Antifungals
Febrile neutropenia
Empiric therapy
Systematic review
Network meta-analysis
author_facet Ken Chen
Qi Wang
Roy A. Pleasants
Long Ge
Wei Liu
Kangning Peng
Suodi Zhai
author_sort Ken Chen
title Empiric treatment against invasive fungal diseases in febrile neutropenic patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_short Empiric treatment against invasive fungal diseases in febrile neutropenic patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full Empiric treatment against invasive fungal diseases in febrile neutropenic patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Empiric treatment against invasive fungal diseases in febrile neutropenic patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Empiric treatment against invasive fungal diseases in febrile neutropenic patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_sort empiric treatment against invasive fungal diseases in febrile neutropenic patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
publisher BMC
series BMC Infectious Diseases
issn 1471-2334
publishDate 2017-02-01
description Abstract Background The most optimal antifungal agent for empiric treatment of invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) in febrile neutropenia is controversial. Our objective was evaluate the relative efficacy of antifungals for all-cause mortality, fungal infection-related mortality and treatment response in this population. Methods Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Two reviewers performed the quality assessment and extracted data independently. Pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis were conducted to compare the antifungals. Results Seventeen RCTs involving 4583 patients were included. Risk of bias of included studies was moderate. Pairwise meta-analysis indicated the treatment response rate of itraconazole was significantly better than conventional amphotericin B (RR = 1.33, 95%CI 1.10–1.61). Network meta-analysis showed that amphotericin B lipid complex, conventional amphotericin B, liposomal amphotericin B, itraconazole and voriconazole had a significantly lower rate of fungal infection-related mortality than no antifungal treatment. Other differences in outcomes among antifungals were not statistically significant. From the rank probability plot, caspofungin appeared to be the most effective agent for all-cause mortality and fungal infection-related mortality, whereas micafungin tended to be superior for treatment response. The results were stable after excluding RCTs with high risk of bias, whereas micafungin had the lowest fungal infection-related mortality. Conclusions Our results highlighted the necessity of empiric antifungal treatment and indicates that echinocandins appeared to be the most effective agents for empiric treatment of febrile neutropenic patients based on mortality and treatment response. However, more studies are needed to determine the best antifungal agent for empiric treatment. Our systematic review has been prospectively registered in PROSPERO and the registration number was CRD42015026629.
topic Antifungals
Febrile neutropenia
Empiric therapy
Systematic review
Network meta-analysis
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12879-017-2263-6
work_keys_str_mv AT kenchen empirictreatmentagainstinvasivefungaldiseasesinfebrileneutropenicpatientsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT qiwang empirictreatmentagainstinvasivefungaldiseasesinfebrileneutropenicpatientsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT royapleasants empirictreatmentagainstinvasivefungaldiseasesinfebrileneutropenicpatientsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT longge empirictreatmentagainstinvasivefungaldiseasesinfebrileneutropenicpatientsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT weiliu empirictreatmentagainstinvasivefungaldiseasesinfebrileneutropenicpatientsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT kangningpeng empirictreatmentagainstinvasivefungaldiseasesinfebrileneutropenicpatientsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT suodizhai empirictreatmentagainstinvasivefungaldiseasesinfebrileneutropenicpatientsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
_version_ 1724529286604390400