Not All Green Space Is Created Equal: Biodiversity Predicts Psychological Restorative Benefits From Urban Green Space

Contemporary epidemiological methods testing the associations between green space and psychological well-being treat all vegetation cover as equal. However, there is very good reason to expect that variations in ecological “quality” (number of species, integrity of ecological processes) may influenc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emma Wood, Alice Harsant, Martin Dallimer, Anna Cronin de Chavez, Rosemary R. C. McEachan, Christopher Hassall
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02320/full
id doaj-55923db6488d47cab627f2b42b4e046a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-55923db6488d47cab627f2b42b4e046a2020-11-24T23:01:13ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782018-11-01910.3389/fpsyg.2018.02320391823Not All Green Space Is Created Equal: Biodiversity Predicts Psychological Restorative Benefits From Urban Green SpaceEmma Wood0Alice Harsant1Martin Dallimer2Anna Cronin de Chavez3Rosemary R. C. McEachan4Christopher Hassall5School of Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United KingdomSchool of Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United KingdomSustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, United KingdomBradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, United KingdomBradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, United KingdomSchool of Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United KingdomContemporary epidemiological methods testing the associations between green space and psychological well-being treat all vegetation cover as equal. However, there is very good reason to expect that variations in ecological “quality” (number of species, integrity of ecological processes) may influence the link between access to green space and benefits to human health and well-being. We test the relationship between green space quality and restorative benefit in an inner city urban population in Bradford, United Kingdom. We selected 12 urban parks for study where we carried out botanical and faunal surveys to quantify biodiversity and assessed the site facilities of the green space (cleanliness, provision of amenities). We also conducted 128 surveys with park users to quantify psychological restoration based on four self-reported measure of general restoration, attention-grabbing distractions, being away from everyday life, and site preference. We present three key results. First, there is a positive association between site facilities and biodiversity. Second, restorative benefit is predicted by biodiversity, which explained 43% of the variance in restorative benefit across the parks, with minimal input from other variables. Third, the benefits accrued through access to green space were unrelated to age, gender, and ethnic background. The results add to a small but growing body of evidence that emphasize the role of nature in contributing to the well-being of urban populations and, hence, the need to consider biodiversity in the design of landscapes that enhance multiple ecosystem services.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02320/fullgreen spacepsychological restorationbiodiversityparkurbancity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Emma Wood
Alice Harsant
Martin Dallimer
Anna Cronin de Chavez
Rosemary R. C. McEachan
Christopher Hassall
spellingShingle Emma Wood
Alice Harsant
Martin Dallimer
Anna Cronin de Chavez
Rosemary R. C. McEachan
Christopher Hassall
Not All Green Space Is Created Equal: Biodiversity Predicts Psychological Restorative Benefits From Urban Green Space
Frontiers in Psychology
green space
psychological restoration
biodiversity
park
urban
city
author_facet Emma Wood
Alice Harsant
Martin Dallimer
Anna Cronin de Chavez
Rosemary R. C. McEachan
Christopher Hassall
author_sort Emma Wood
title Not All Green Space Is Created Equal: Biodiversity Predicts Psychological Restorative Benefits From Urban Green Space
title_short Not All Green Space Is Created Equal: Biodiversity Predicts Psychological Restorative Benefits From Urban Green Space
title_full Not All Green Space Is Created Equal: Biodiversity Predicts Psychological Restorative Benefits From Urban Green Space
title_fullStr Not All Green Space Is Created Equal: Biodiversity Predicts Psychological Restorative Benefits From Urban Green Space
title_full_unstemmed Not All Green Space Is Created Equal: Biodiversity Predicts Psychological Restorative Benefits From Urban Green Space
title_sort not all green space is created equal: biodiversity predicts psychological restorative benefits from urban green space
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2018-11-01
description Contemporary epidemiological methods testing the associations between green space and psychological well-being treat all vegetation cover as equal. However, there is very good reason to expect that variations in ecological “quality” (number of species, integrity of ecological processes) may influence the link between access to green space and benefits to human health and well-being. We test the relationship between green space quality and restorative benefit in an inner city urban population in Bradford, United Kingdom. We selected 12 urban parks for study where we carried out botanical and faunal surveys to quantify biodiversity and assessed the site facilities of the green space (cleanliness, provision of amenities). We also conducted 128 surveys with park users to quantify psychological restoration based on four self-reported measure of general restoration, attention-grabbing distractions, being away from everyday life, and site preference. We present three key results. First, there is a positive association between site facilities and biodiversity. Second, restorative benefit is predicted by biodiversity, which explained 43% of the variance in restorative benefit across the parks, with minimal input from other variables. Third, the benefits accrued through access to green space were unrelated to age, gender, and ethnic background. The results add to a small but growing body of evidence that emphasize the role of nature in contributing to the well-being of urban populations and, hence, the need to consider biodiversity in the design of landscapes that enhance multiple ecosystem services.
topic green space
psychological restoration
biodiversity
park
urban
city
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02320/full
work_keys_str_mv AT emmawood notallgreenspaceiscreatedequalbiodiversitypredictspsychologicalrestorativebenefitsfromurbangreenspace
AT aliceharsant notallgreenspaceiscreatedequalbiodiversitypredictspsychologicalrestorativebenefitsfromurbangreenspace
AT martindallimer notallgreenspaceiscreatedequalbiodiversitypredictspsychologicalrestorativebenefitsfromurbangreenspace
AT annacronindechavez notallgreenspaceiscreatedequalbiodiversitypredictspsychologicalrestorativebenefitsfromurbangreenspace
AT rosemaryrcmceachan notallgreenspaceiscreatedequalbiodiversitypredictspsychologicalrestorativebenefitsfromurbangreenspace
AT christopherhassall notallgreenspaceiscreatedequalbiodiversitypredictspsychologicalrestorativebenefitsfromurbangreenspace
_version_ 1725640275519340544