Power estimations for non-primary outcomes in randomised clinical trials
Objective and methods: It is rare that trialists report power estimations of non-primary outcomes. In the present article, we will describe how to define a valid hierarchy of outcomes in a randomised clinical trial, to limit problems with Type I and Type II errors, using considerations on the clinic...
Main Authors: | Per Winkel, Janus Christian Jakobsen, Jørgen Hilden, Christian Gluud, Jørn Wetterslev, Christian Ovesen |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019-06-01
|
Series: | BMJ Open |
Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/6/e027092.full |
Similar Items
-
When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials – a practical guide with flowcharts
by: Janus Christian Jakobsen, et al.
Published: (2017-12-01) -
Trial Sequential Analysis in systematic reviews with meta-analysis
by: Jørn Wetterslev, et al.
Published: (2017-03-01) -
Prothrombin complex concentrate versus placebo, no intervention, or other interventions in critically bleeding patients associated with oral anticoagulant administration: a protocol for a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
by: Christian Ovesen, et al.
Published: (2018-10-01) -
‘Third wave’ cognitive therapy versus mentalization-based therapy for major depressive disorder. A protocol for a randomised clinical trial
by: Jakobsen Janus Christian, et al.
Published: (2012-12-01) -
Predictors for major cardiovascular outcomes in stable ischaemic heart disease (PREMAC): statistical analysis plan for data originating from the CLARICOR (clarithromycin for patients with stable coronary heart disease) trial
by: Per Winkel, et al.
Published: (2017-03-01)