Group consensus peer review in radiation oncology: commitment to quality
Abstract Background Peer review, especially prospective peer review, has been supported by professional organizations as an important element in optimal Radiation Oncology practice based on its demonstration of efficacy at detecting and preventing errors prior to patient treatment. Implementation of...
Main Authors: | W Neil Duggar, Rahul Bhandari, Chunli Claus Yang, Srinivasan Vijayakumar |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-03-01
|
Series: | Radiation Oncology |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13014-018-1006-1 |
Similar Items
-
Analysis of a real time group consensus peer review process in radiation oncology: an evaluation of effectiveness and feasibility
by: Ashley A. Albert, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01) -
Chasing Zero Harm in Radiation Oncology: Using Pre-treatment Peer Review
by: Srinivasan Vijayakumar, et al.
Published: (2019-04-01) -
Upcoming imaging concepts and their impact on treatment planning and treatment response in radiation oncology
by: Paul Russell Roberts, et al.
Published: (2018-08-01) -
Why "Radiation Oncology"
by: Camphausen Kevin A, et al.
Published: (2006-02-01) -
Breast reconstruction and radiation therapy: consensus statements of the Italian association of radiotherapy and clinical oncology (AIRO) breast cancer group
by: I. Meattini, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01)