COMPARISON OF 2D AND 3D APPROACHES FOR THE ALIGNMENT OF UAV AND LIDAR POINT CLOUDS

The automatic alignment of 3D point clouds acquired or generated from different sensors is a challenging problem. The objective of the alignment is to estimate the 3D similarity transformation parameters, including a global scale factor, 3 rotations and 3 translations. To do so, corresponding anchor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: R. A. Persad, C. Armenakis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2017-08-01
Series:The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
Online Access:https://www.int-arch-photogramm-remote-sens-spatial-inf-sci.net/XLII-2-W6/275/2017/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W6-275-2017.pdf
id doaj-55bb570796294844b45a84335345f6a4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-55bb570796294844b45a84335345f6a42020-11-25T00:56:00ZengCopernicus PublicationsThe International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences1682-17502194-90342017-08-01XLII-2-W627527910.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W6-275-2017COMPARISON OF 2D AND 3D APPROACHES FOR THE ALIGNMENT OF UAV AND LIDAR POINT CLOUDSR. A. Persad0C. Armenakis1Geomatics Engineering, GeoICT Lab, Department of Earth and Space Science and Engineering, Lassonde School of Engineering, York University, 4700 Keele St., Toronto, Ontario, M3J 1P3 CanadaGeomatics Engineering, GeoICT Lab, Department of Earth and Space Science and Engineering, Lassonde School of Engineering, York University, 4700 Keele St., Toronto, Ontario, M3J 1P3 CanadaThe automatic alignment of 3D point clouds acquired or generated from different sensors is a challenging problem. The objective of the alignment is to estimate the 3D similarity transformation parameters, including a global scale factor, 3 rotations and 3 translations. To do so, corresponding anchor features are required in both data sets. There are two main types of alignment: i) Coarse alignment and ii) Refined Alignment. Coarse alignment issues include lack of any prior knowledge of the respective coordinate systems for a source and target point cloud pair and the difficulty to extract and match corresponding control features (e.g., points, lines or planes) co-located on both point cloud pairs to be aligned. With the increasing use of UAVs, there is a need to automatically co-register their generated point cloud-based digital surface models with those from other data acquisition systems such as terrestrial or airborne lidar point clouds. This works presents a comparative study of two independent feature matching techniques for addressing 3D conformal point cloud alignment of UAV and lidar data in different 3D coordinate systems without any prior knowledge of the seven transformation parameters.https://www.int-arch-photogramm-remote-sens-spatial-inf-sci.net/XLII-2-W6/275/2017/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W6-275-2017.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author R. A. Persad
C. Armenakis
spellingShingle R. A. Persad
C. Armenakis
COMPARISON OF 2D AND 3D APPROACHES FOR THE ALIGNMENT OF UAV AND LIDAR POINT CLOUDS
The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
author_facet R. A. Persad
C. Armenakis
author_sort R. A. Persad
title COMPARISON OF 2D AND 3D APPROACHES FOR THE ALIGNMENT OF UAV AND LIDAR POINT CLOUDS
title_short COMPARISON OF 2D AND 3D APPROACHES FOR THE ALIGNMENT OF UAV AND LIDAR POINT CLOUDS
title_full COMPARISON OF 2D AND 3D APPROACHES FOR THE ALIGNMENT OF UAV AND LIDAR POINT CLOUDS
title_fullStr COMPARISON OF 2D AND 3D APPROACHES FOR THE ALIGNMENT OF UAV AND LIDAR POINT CLOUDS
title_full_unstemmed COMPARISON OF 2D AND 3D APPROACHES FOR THE ALIGNMENT OF UAV AND LIDAR POINT CLOUDS
title_sort comparison of 2d and 3d approaches for the alignment of uav and lidar point clouds
publisher Copernicus Publications
series The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
issn 1682-1750
2194-9034
publishDate 2017-08-01
description The automatic alignment of 3D point clouds acquired or generated from different sensors is a challenging problem. The objective of the alignment is to estimate the 3D similarity transformation parameters, including a global scale factor, 3 rotations and 3 translations. To do so, corresponding anchor features are required in both data sets. There are two main types of alignment: i) Coarse alignment and ii) Refined Alignment. Coarse alignment issues include lack of any prior knowledge of the respective coordinate systems for a source and target point cloud pair and the difficulty to extract and match corresponding control features (e.g., points, lines or planes) co-located on both point cloud pairs to be aligned. With the increasing use of UAVs, there is a need to automatically co-register their generated point cloud-based digital surface models with those from other data acquisition systems such as terrestrial or airborne lidar point clouds. This works presents a comparative study of two independent feature matching techniques for addressing 3D conformal point cloud alignment of UAV and lidar data in different 3D coordinate systems without any prior knowledge of the seven transformation parameters.
url https://www.int-arch-photogramm-remote-sens-spatial-inf-sci.net/XLII-2-W6/275/2017/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W6-275-2017.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT rapersad comparisonof2dand3dapproachesforthealignmentofuavandlidarpointclouds
AT carmenakis comparisonof2dand3dapproachesforthealignmentofuavandlidarpointclouds
_version_ 1725228538211074048