The influence of biomass agitation on biogas and methane production using the high-solids thermophilic anaerobic digestion

In this study, we tested the high-solids thermophilic anaerobic digestion of separated cattle slurry solids inoculated by liquid digestate collected from the 1st stage of the wet process operated in an agricultural mesophilic biogas plant. The process without batch agitation (stirring) was carried o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rusin Jiri, Chamradova Katerina, Grycova Barbora
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2017-05-01
Series:Green Processing and Synthesis
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/gps-2016-0181
id doaj-55c8286abf5246dc9e58e8b24d869745
record_format Article
spelling doaj-55c8286abf5246dc9e58e8b24d8697452021-10-02T18:54:48ZengDe GruyterGreen Processing and Synthesis2191-95422191-95502017-05-016327327910.1515/gps-2016-0181The influence of biomass agitation on biogas and methane production using the high-solids thermophilic anaerobic digestionRusin Jiri0Chamradova Katerina1Grycova Barbora2Institute of Environmental Technology, VSB Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech RepublicKaterina Chamradova, Institute of Environmental Technology, VSB Technical University of Ostrava, 17 listopadu 15/2172, Ostrava-Poruba, 708 33, Czech RepublicInstitute of Environmental Technology, VSB Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech RepublicIn this study, we tested the high-solids thermophilic anaerobic digestion of separated cattle slurry solids inoculated by liquid digestate collected from the 1st stage of the wet process operated in an agricultural mesophilic biogas plant. The process without batch agitation (stirring) was carried out in a barrel bioreactor located in the incubator, whereas the process with batch agitation was carried out in a rotating drum bioreactor (rotation speed: 0.1 min−1). In both cases, the biomass batch was non-liquid and the content of total solids was 18.8 wt%. The processes were conducted discontinuously without any addition for 21 days. The total solids content of both batches decreased to about 15 wt%, with only slight liquefaction. The bulk density increased from 500 to 750 kg m−3. The highest biogas production was achieved consistently on the 7th day. During the 21-day period, the unagitated batch produced 0.120 mN3 of biogas, and the agitated batch produced 32.5% extra. The average CH4 content in biogas from the unstirred batch amounted to 47.7 vol.%, and biogas from the stirred batch reached 46.2 vol.%. The cumulative methane production rates from the unagitated and agitated batches were 0.095 and 0.121 mN3 kgVS−1, respectively. Thus, the agitation resulted in 28.5% higher methane yield.https://doi.org/10.1515/gps-2016-0181biogascattle slurryhigh-solids (dry) anaerobic digestionmethan
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rusin Jiri
Chamradova Katerina
Grycova Barbora
spellingShingle Rusin Jiri
Chamradova Katerina
Grycova Barbora
The influence of biomass agitation on biogas and methane production using the high-solids thermophilic anaerobic digestion
Green Processing and Synthesis
biogas
cattle slurry
high-solids (dry) anaerobic digestion
methan
author_facet Rusin Jiri
Chamradova Katerina
Grycova Barbora
author_sort Rusin Jiri
title The influence of biomass agitation on biogas and methane production using the high-solids thermophilic anaerobic digestion
title_short The influence of biomass agitation on biogas and methane production using the high-solids thermophilic anaerobic digestion
title_full The influence of biomass agitation on biogas and methane production using the high-solids thermophilic anaerobic digestion
title_fullStr The influence of biomass agitation on biogas and methane production using the high-solids thermophilic anaerobic digestion
title_full_unstemmed The influence of biomass agitation on biogas and methane production using the high-solids thermophilic anaerobic digestion
title_sort influence of biomass agitation on biogas and methane production using the high-solids thermophilic anaerobic digestion
publisher De Gruyter
series Green Processing and Synthesis
issn 2191-9542
2191-9550
publishDate 2017-05-01
description In this study, we tested the high-solids thermophilic anaerobic digestion of separated cattle slurry solids inoculated by liquid digestate collected from the 1st stage of the wet process operated in an agricultural mesophilic biogas plant. The process without batch agitation (stirring) was carried out in a barrel bioreactor located in the incubator, whereas the process with batch agitation was carried out in a rotating drum bioreactor (rotation speed: 0.1 min−1). In both cases, the biomass batch was non-liquid and the content of total solids was 18.8 wt%. The processes were conducted discontinuously without any addition for 21 days. The total solids content of both batches decreased to about 15 wt%, with only slight liquefaction. The bulk density increased from 500 to 750 kg m−3. The highest biogas production was achieved consistently on the 7th day. During the 21-day period, the unagitated batch produced 0.120 mN3 of biogas, and the agitated batch produced 32.5% extra. The average CH4 content in biogas from the unstirred batch amounted to 47.7 vol.%, and biogas from the stirred batch reached 46.2 vol.%. The cumulative methane production rates from the unagitated and agitated batches were 0.095 and 0.121 mN3 kgVS−1, respectively. Thus, the agitation resulted in 28.5% higher methane yield.
topic biogas
cattle slurry
high-solids (dry) anaerobic digestion
methan
url https://doi.org/10.1515/gps-2016-0181
work_keys_str_mv AT rusinjiri theinfluenceofbiomassagitationonbiogasandmethaneproductionusingthehighsolidsthermophilicanaerobicdigestion
AT chamradovakaterina theinfluenceofbiomassagitationonbiogasandmethaneproductionusingthehighsolidsthermophilicanaerobicdigestion
AT grycovabarbora theinfluenceofbiomassagitationonbiogasandmethaneproductionusingthehighsolidsthermophilicanaerobicdigestion
AT rusinjiri influenceofbiomassagitationonbiogasandmethaneproductionusingthehighsolidsthermophilicanaerobicdigestion
AT chamradovakaterina influenceofbiomassagitationonbiogasandmethaneproductionusingthehighsolidsthermophilicanaerobicdigestion
AT grycovabarbora influenceofbiomassagitationonbiogasandmethaneproductionusingthehighsolidsthermophilicanaerobicdigestion
_version_ 1716848563208585216