Operational implementation of LED fluorescence microscopy in screening tuberculosis suspects in an urban HIV clinic in Uganda.

BACKGROUND: Light emitting diode (LED) fluorescence microscopy (FM) is an affordable, technology targeted for use in resource-limited settings and recommended for widespread roll-out by the World Health Organization (WHO). We sought to compare the operational performance of three LED FM methods comp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Heidi Albert, Lydia Nakiyingi, Joseph Sempa, Olive Mbabazi, Sheena Mukkada, Barnabas Nyesiga, Mark D Perkins, Yukari C Manabe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3765165?pdf=render
id doaj-55cda1d4b2534944a6a5dc09b60609c4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-55cda1d4b2534944a6a5dc09b60609c42020-11-24T21:50:42ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0189e7255610.1371/journal.pone.0072556Operational implementation of LED fluorescence microscopy in screening tuberculosis suspects in an urban HIV clinic in Uganda.Heidi AlbertLydia NakiyingiJoseph SempaOlive MbabaziSheena MukkadaBarnabas NyesigaMark D PerkinsYukari C ManabeBACKGROUND: Light emitting diode (LED) fluorescence microscopy (FM) is an affordable, technology targeted for use in resource-limited settings and recommended for widespread roll-out by the World Health Organization (WHO). We sought to compare the operational performance of three LED FM methods compared to light microscopy in a cohort of HIV-positive tuberculosis (TB) suspects at an urban clinic in a high TB burden country. METHODS: Two spot specimens collected from TB suspects were included in the study. Smears were stained using auramine O method and read after blinding by three LED-based FM methods by trained laboratory technicians in the Infectious Diseases Institutelaboratory. Leftover portions of the refrigerated sputum specimens were transported to the FIND Tuberculosis Research Laboratory for Ziehl Neelsen (ZN) smear preparation and reading by experienced technologist as well as liquid and solid culture. RESULTS: 174 of 627 (27.8%) specimens collected yielded one or more positive mycobacterial cultures. 94.3% (164/174) were M. tuberculosis complex. LED FM was between 7.3-11.0% more sensitive compared to ZN microscopy. Of the 592 specimens examined by all microscopy methods, there was no significant difference in sensitivity between the three LED FM methods. The specificity of the LED FM methods was between 6.1% and 7.7% lower than ZN microscopy (P<0.001), although exclusion of the single poor reader resulted in over 98% specificity for all FM methods. CONCLUSIONS: Laboratory technicians in routine settings can be trained to use FM which is more sensitive than ZN microscopy. Despite rigorous proficiency testing, there were operator-dependent accuracy issues which highlight the critical need for intensive quality assurance procedures during LED FM implementation. The low sensitivity of FM for HIV-positive individuals particularly those with low CD4 T cell counts, will limit the number of additional patients found by LED FM in countries with high rates of HIV co-infection.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3765165?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Heidi Albert
Lydia Nakiyingi
Joseph Sempa
Olive Mbabazi
Sheena Mukkada
Barnabas Nyesiga
Mark D Perkins
Yukari C Manabe
spellingShingle Heidi Albert
Lydia Nakiyingi
Joseph Sempa
Olive Mbabazi
Sheena Mukkada
Barnabas Nyesiga
Mark D Perkins
Yukari C Manabe
Operational implementation of LED fluorescence microscopy in screening tuberculosis suspects in an urban HIV clinic in Uganda.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Heidi Albert
Lydia Nakiyingi
Joseph Sempa
Olive Mbabazi
Sheena Mukkada
Barnabas Nyesiga
Mark D Perkins
Yukari C Manabe
author_sort Heidi Albert
title Operational implementation of LED fluorescence microscopy in screening tuberculosis suspects in an urban HIV clinic in Uganda.
title_short Operational implementation of LED fluorescence microscopy in screening tuberculosis suspects in an urban HIV clinic in Uganda.
title_full Operational implementation of LED fluorescence microscopy in screening tuberculosis suspects in an urban HIV clinic in Uganda.
title_fullStr Operational implementation of LED fluorescence microscopy in screening tuberculosis suspects in an urban HIV clinic in Uganda.
title_full_unstemmed Operational implementation of LED fluorescence microscopy in screening tuberculosis suspects in an urban HIV clinic in Uganda.
title_sort operational implementation of led fluorescence microscopy in screening tuberculosis suspects in an urban hiv clinic in uganda.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description BACKGROUND: Light emitting diode (LED) fluorescence microscopy (FM) is an affordable, technology targeted for use in resource-limited settings and recommended for widespread roll-out by the World Health Organization (WHO). We sought to compare the operational performance of three LED FM methods compared to light microscopy in a cohort of HIV-positive tuberculosis (TB) suspects at an urban clinic in a high TB burden country. METHODS: Two spot specimens collected from TB suspects were included in the study. Smears were stained using auramine O method and read after blinding by three LED-based FM methods by trained laboratory technicians in the Infectious Diseases Institutelaboratory. Leftover portions of the refrigerated sputum specimens were transported to the FIND Tuberculosis Research Laboratory for Ziehl Neelsen (ZN) smear preparation and reading by experienced technologist as well as liquid and solid culture. RESULTS: 174 of 627 (27.8%) specimens collected yielded one or more positive mycobacterial cultures. 94.3% (164/174) were M. tuberculosis complex. LED FM was between 7.3-11.0% more sensitive compared to ZN microscopy. Of the 592 specimens examined by all microscopy methods, there was no significant difference in sensitivity between the three LED FM methods. The specificity of the LED FM methods was between 6.1% and 7.7% lower than ZN microscopy (P<0.001), although exclusion of the single poor reader resulted in over 98% specificity for all FM methods. CONCLUSIONS: Laboratory technicians in routine settings can be trained to use FM which is more sensitive than ZN microscopy. Despite rigorous proficiency testing, there were operator-dependent accuracy issues which highlight the critical need for intensive quality assurance procedures during LED FM implementation. The low sensitivity of FM for HIV-positive individuals particularly those with low CD4 T cell counts, will limit the number of additional patients found by LED FM in countries with high rates of HIV co-infection.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3765165?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT heidialbert operationalimplementationofledfluorescencemicroscopyinscreeningtuberculosissuspectsinanurbanhivclinicinuganda
AT lydianakiyingi operationalimplementationofledfluorescencemicroscopyinscreeningtuberculosissuspectsinanurbanhivclinicinuganda
AT josephsempa operationalimplementationofledfluorescencemicroscopyinscreeningtuberculosissuspectsinanurbanhivclinicinuganda
AT olivembabazi operationalimplementationofledfluorescencemicroscopyinscreeningtuberculosissuspectsinanurbanhivclinicinuganda
AT sheenamukkada operationalimplementationofledfluorescencemicroscopyinscreeningtuberculosissuspectsinanurbanhivclinicinuganda
AT barnabasnyesiga operationalimplementationofledfluorescencemicroscopyinscreeningtuberculosissuspectsinanurbanhivclinicinuganda
AT markdperkins operationalimplementationofledfluorescencemicroscopyinscreeningtuberculosissuspectsinanurbanhivclinicinuganda
AT yukaricmanabe operationalimplementationofledfluorescencemicroscopyinscreeningtuberculosissuspectsinanurbanhivclinicinuganda
_version_ 1725882161603543040