Definiteness Systems and Dialect Classification
In this article I explore how typological approaches can be used to construct novel classification schemes for Arabic dialects, taking the example of definiteness as a case study. Definiteness in Arabic has traditionally been envisioned as an essentially binary system, wherein definite substantives...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-07-01
|
Series: | Languages |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/6/3/128 |
id |
doaj-55f70c04e61f46518b9d5ab3ab5aeb72 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-55f70c04e61f46518b9d5ab3ab5aeb722021-09-26T00:33:44ZengMDPI AGLanguages2226-471X2021-07-01612812810.3390/languages6030128Definiteness Systems and Dialect ClassificationMike Turner0Department of World Languages & Cultures, The University of North Carolina Wilmington, Wilmington, NC 28403, USAIn this article I explore how typological approaches can be used to construct novel classification schemes for Arabic dialects, taking the example of definiteness as a case study. Definiteness in Arabic has traditionally been envisioned as an essentially binary system, wherein definite substantives are marked with a reflex of the article <i>al</i>- and indefinite ones are not. Recent work has complicated this model, framing definiteness instead as a continuum along which speakers can locate referents using a broader range of morphological and syntactic strategies, including not only the article <i>al</i>-, but also reflexes of the demonstrative series and a diverse set of ‘indefinite-specific’ articles found throughout the spoken dialects. I argue that it is possible to describe these strategies with even more precision by modeling them within cross-linguistic frameworks for semantic typology, among them a model known as the ‘Reference Hierarchy,’ which I adopt here. This modeling process allows for classification of dialects not by the presence of shared forms, but rather by parallel typological configurations, even if the forms within them are disparate.https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/6/3/128definitenessindefinitenessspecificityreferentialitydeterminationarticle systems |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mike Turner |
spellingShingle |
Mike Turner Definiteness Systems and Dialect Classification Languages definiteness indefiniteness specificity referentiality determination article systems |
author_facet |
Mike Turner |
author_sort |
Mike Turner |
title |
Definiteness Systems and Dialect Classification |
title_short |
Definiteness Systems and Dialect Classification |
title_full |
Definiteness Systems and Dialect Classification |
title_fullStr |
Definiteness Systems and Dialect Classification |
title_full_unstemmed |
Definiteness Systems and Dialect Classification |
title_sort |
definiteness systems and dialect classification |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Languages |
issn |
2226-471X |
publishDate |
2021-07-01 |
description |
In this article I explore how typological approaches can be used to construct novel classification schemes for Arabic dialects, taking the example of definiteness as a case study. Definiteness in Arabic has traditionally been envisioned as an essentially binary system, wherein definite substantives are marked with a reflex of the article <i>al</i>- and indefinite ones are not. Recent work has complicated this model, framing definiteness instead as a continuum along which speakers can locate referents using a broader range of morphological and syntactic strategies, including not only the article <i>al</i>-, but also reflexes of the demonstrative series and a diverse set of ‘indefinite-specific’ articles found throughout the spoken dialects. I argue that it is possible to describe these strategies with even more precision by modeling them within cross-linguistic frameworks for semantic typology, among them a model known as the ‘Reference Hierarchy,’ which I adopt here. This modeling process allows for classification of dialects not by the presence of shared forms, but rather by parallel typological configurations, even if the forms within them are disparate. |
topic |
definiteness indefiniteness specificity referentiality determination article systems |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/6/3/128 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT miketurner definitenesssystemsanddialectclassification |
_version_ |
1716870419956367360 |