Urban Extension: Aligning with the Needs of Urban Audiences Through Subject-Matter Centers

The educational program model is the principle approach Extension uses to deliver on its mission of “taking knowledge to the people.” However, with county-based faculty fully engaged in long-term program delivery, they may have little or no capacity to address emerging issues faced by urban communi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brad Gaolach, Michael Kern, Christina Sanders
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Mississippi State University 2017-06-01
Series:Journal of Human Sciences and Extension
Subjects:
Online Access:https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/c8fe6e_2a59d0cf38d242df8f2ba779e30d0869.pdf
id doaj-5621a940ee2f4d06a3b3ed603a05b7a1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5621a940ee2f4d06a3b3ed603a05b7a12020-11-25T02:42:42ZengMississippi State UniversityJournal of Human Sciences and Extension2325-52262325-52262017-06-0152126144Urban Extension: Aligning with the Needs of Urban Audiences Through Subject-Matter CentersBrad Gaolach0Michael Kern1Christina Sanders2Washington State UniversityWashington State UniversityWashington State UniversityThe educational program model is the principle approach Extension uses to deliver on its mission of “taking knowledge to the people.” However, with county-based faculty fully engaged in long-term program delivery, they may have little or no capacity to address emerging issues faced by urban communities. Urban governments often seek the research capacity of a university in addition to, or instead of, the traditional Extension programming model but sometimes turn first to other urban-serving universities. Washington State University Extension has addressed these challenges by establishing subject-matter centers. This article examines how subject-matter centers can add capacity to traditional Extension offices in order to be responsive to emerging local needs, suggesting models that other university Extension programs may use or adapt to their local communities. These models also foster more community engagement and articulate greater public value for the institution as a whole.https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/c8fe6e_2a59d0cf38d242df8f2ba779e30d0869.pdfmetropolitanpublic policyshort-term projectsbuilding capacityresponsivenessprogrammingpublic valueExtensionurban extensionCooperative ExtensionExtension ServiceCooperative Extension Service
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Brad Gaolach
Michael Kern
Christina Sanders
spellingShingle Brad Gaolach
Michael Kern
Christina Sanders
Urban Extension: Aligning with the Needs of Urban Audiences Through Subject-Matter Centers
Journal of Human Sciences and Extension
metropolitan
public policy
short-term projects
building capacity
responsiveness
programming
public value
Extension
urban extension
Cooperative Extension
Extension Service
Cooperative Extension Service
author_facet Brad Gaolach
Michael Kern
Christina Sanders
author_sort Brad Gaolach
title Urban Extension: Aligning with the Needs of Urban Audiences Through Subject-Matter Centers
title_short Urban Extension: Aligning with the Needs of Urban Audiences Through Subject-Matter Centers
title_full Urban Extension: Aligning with the Needs of Urban Audiences Through Subject-Matter Centers
title_fullStr Urban Extension: Aligning with the Needs of Urban Audiences Through Subject-Matter Centers
title_full_unstemmed Urban Extension: Aligning with the Needs of Urban Audiences Through Subject-Matter Centers
title_sort urban extension: aligning with the needs of urban audiences through subject-matter centers
publisher Mississippi State University
series Journal of Human Sciences and Extension
issn 2325-5226
2325-5226
publishDate 2017-06-01
description The educational program model is the principle approach Extension uses to deliver on its mission of “taking knowledge to the people.” However, with county-based faculty fully engaged in long-term program delivery, they may have little or no capacity to address emerging issues faced by urban communities. Urban governments often seek the research capacity of a university in addition to, or instead of, the traditional Extension programming model but sometimes turn first to other urban-serving universities. Washington State University Extension has addressed these challenges by establishing subject-matter centers. This article examines how subject-matter centers can add capacity to traditional Extension offices in order to be responsive to emerging local needs, suggesting models that other university Extension programs may use or adapt to their local communities. These models also foster more community engagement and articulate greater public value for the institution as a whole.
topic metropolitan
public policy
short-term projects
building capacity
responsiveness
programming
public value
Extension
urban extension
Cooperative Extension
Extension Service
Cooperative Extension Service
url https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/c8fe6e_2a59d0cf38d242df8f2ba779e30d0869.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT bradgaolach urbanextensionaligningwiththeneedsofurbanaudiencesthroughsubjectmattercenters
AT michaelkern urbanextensionaligningwiththeneedsofurbanaudiencesthroughsubjectmattercenters
AT christinasanders urbanextensionaligningwiththeneedsofurbanaudiencesthroughsubjectmattercenters
_version_ 1724771943995932672