DUNDRUM-2: Prospective validation of a structured professional judgment instrument assessing priority for admission from the waiting list for a forensic mental health hospital
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The criteria for deciding who should be admitted first from a waiting list to a forensic secure hospital are not necessarily the same as those for assessing need. Criteria were drafted qualitatively and tested in a prospective '...
Main Authors: | O'Neill Conor, Flynn Grainne, Kennedy Harry G |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2011-07-01
|
Series: | BMC Research Notes |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-0500/4/230 |
Similar Items
-
Sustainable waiting time reductions after introducing the STAT model for access and triage: 12-month follow up of a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial
by: Katherine E. Harding, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01) -
Likelihood of being seen within emergency departments’ assigned urgency times for poisoned and injured individuals
by: Rachel L. Rosenthal
Published: (2014-10-01) -
Norwegian Priority Setting in Practice – an Analysis of Waiting Time Patterns Across Medical Disciplines
by: Jurgita Januleviciute Gangstøe, et al.
Published: (2016-06-01) -
The DUNDRUM-1 structured professional judgment for triage to appropriate levels of therapeutic security: retrospective-cohort validation study
by: O'Neill Conor, et al.
Published: (2011-03-01) -
The Cost of Waiting on an Orthopaedic Waiting List: a scoping review
by: Joanne Morris, et al.
Published: (2017-07-01)