Capillary whole-blood IgG-IgM COVID-19 self-test as a serological screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection adapted to the general public.
The practicability of a prototype capillary whole-blood IgG-IgM COVID-19 self-test (Exacto® COVID-19 self-test, Biosynex Swiss SA, Freiburg, Switzerland) as a serological screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection adapted to the general public was evaluated in a cross-sectional, general adult populatio...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2020-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240779 |
id |
doaj-566f75fe33fb48eda948da0251f5115d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-566f75fe33fb48eda948da0251f5115d2021-03-04T11:53:23ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-011510e024077910.1371/journal.pone.0240779Capillary whole-blood IgG-IgM COVID-19 self-test as a serological screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection adapted to the general public.Serge Tonen-WolyecRaphael DupontSalomon Batina-AgasaMarie-Pierre HayetteLaurent BélecThe practicability of a prototype capillary whole-blood IgG-IgM COVID-19 self-test (Exacto® COVID-19 self-test, Biosynex Swiss SA, Freiburg, Switzerland) as a serological screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection adapted to the general public was evaluated in a cross-sectional, general adult population study performed between April and May 2020 in Strasbourg, France, consisting of face-to-face, paper-based, semi-structured, and self-administrated questionnaires. Practicability was defined as the correct use of the self-test and the correct interpretation of the result. The correct use of self-test was conditioned by the presence of the control band after 15-min of migration. The correct interpretation of the tests was defined by the percent agreement between the tests results read and interpret by the participants compared to the expected results coded by the numbers and verified by trained observers. A total of 167 participants (52.7% female; median age, 35.8 years; 82% with post-graduate level) were enrolled, including 83 and 84 for usability and test results interpretation substudies, respectively. All participants (100%; 95% CI: 95.6-100) correctly used the self-test. However, 12 (14.5%; 95% CI: 8.5-23.6) asked for verbal help. The percent agreement between the tests results read and interpret by the participants compared to the expected results was 98.5% (95% CI: 96.5-99.4). However, misinterpretation occurred in only 2.3% of positive and 1.2% of invalid test results. Finally, all (100%) participants found that performing the COVID-19 self-test was easy; and 98.8% found the interpretation of the self-test results easy. Taken together, these pilot observations demonstrated for the first-time, high practicability and satisfaction of COVID-19 self-testing for serological IgG and IgM immune status, indicating its potential for use by the general public to complete the arsenal of available SARS-CoV-2 serological assays in the urgent context of the COVID-19 epidemic.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240779 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Serge Tonen-Wolyec Raphael Dupont Salomon Batina-Agasa Marie-Pierre Hayette Laurent Bélec |
spellingShingle |
Serge Tonen-Wolyec Raphael Dupont Salomon Batina-Agasa Marie-Pierre Hayette Laurent Bélec Capillary whole-blood IgG-IgM COVID-19 self-test as a serological screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection adapted to the general public. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Serge Tonen-Wolyec Raphael Dupont Salomon Batina-Agasa Marie-Pierre Hayette Laurent Bélec |
author_sort |
Serge Tonen-Wolyec |
title |
Capillary whole-blood IgG-IgM COVID-19 self-test as a serological screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection adapted to the general public. |
title_short |
Capillary whole-blood IgG-IgM COVID-19 self-test as a serological screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection adapted to the general public. |
title_full |
Capillary whole-blood IgG-IgM COVID-19 self-test as a serological screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection adapted to the general public. |
title_fullStr |
Capillary whole-blood IgG-IgM COVID-19 self-test as a serological screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection adapted to the general public. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Capillary whole-blood IgG-IgM COVID-19 self-test as a serological screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection adapted to the general public. |
title_sort |
capillary whole-blood igg-igm covid-19 self-test as a serological screening tool for sars-cov-2 infection adapted to the general public. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
The practicability of a prototype capillary whole-blood IgG-IgM COVID-19 self-test (Exacto® COVID-19 self-test, Biosynex Swiss SA, Freiburg, Switzerland) as a serological screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection adapted to the general public was evaluated in a cross-sectional, general adult population study performed between April and May 2020 in Strasbourg, France, consisting of face-to-face, paper-based, semi-structured, and self-administrated questionnaires. Practicability was defined as the correct use of the self-test and the correct interpretation of the result. The correct use of self-test was conditioned by the presence of the control band after 15-min of migration. The correct interpretation of the tests was defined by the percent agreement between the tests results read and interpret by the participants compared to the expected results coded by the numbers and verified by trained observers. A total of 167 participants (52.7% female; median age, 35.8 years; 82% with post-graduate level) were enrolled, including 83 and 84 for usability and test results interpretation substudies, respectively. All participants (100%; 95% CI: 95.6-100) correctly used the self-test. However, 12 (14.5%; 95% CI: 8.5-23.6) asked for verbal help. The percent agreement between the tests results read and interpret by the participants compared to the expected results was 98.5% (95% CI: 96.5-99.4). However, misinterpretation occurred in only 2.3% of positive and 1.2% of invalid test results. Finally, all (100%) participants found that performing the COVID-19 self-test was easy; and 98.8% found the interpretation of the self-test results easy. Taken together, these pilot observations demonstrated for the first-time, high practicability and satisfaction of COVID-19 self-testing for serological IgG and IgM immune status, indicating its potential for use by the general public to complete the arsenal of available SARS-CoV-2 serological assays in the urgent context of the COVID-19 epidemic. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240779 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sergetonenwolyec capillarywholebloodiggigmcovid19selftestasaserologicalscreeningtoolforsarscov2infectionadaptedtothegeneralpublic AT raphaeldupont capillarywholebloodiggigmcovid19selftestasaserologicalscreeningtoolforsarscov2infectionadaptedtothegeneralpublic AT salomonbatinaagasa capillarywholebloodiggigmcovid19selftestasaserologicalscreeningtoolforsarscov2infectionadaptedtothegeneralpublic AT mariepierrehayette capillarywholebloodiggigmcovid19selftestasaserologicalscreeningtoolforsarscov2infectionadaptedtothegeneralpublic AT laurentbelec capillarywholebloodiggigmcovid19selftestasaserologicalscreeningtoolforsarscov2infectionadaptedtothegeneralpublic |
_version_ |
1714803314425593856 |