An Indirect Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Elvitegravir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and Abacavir/Lamivudine + Dolutegravir in Initial Therapy.

OBJECTIVES:The objective of this analysis is to perform an indirect comparison of elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine and tenofovir DF (E/C/F/TDF) to abacavir/lamivudine and dolutegravir (ABC/3TC + DTG) by using 2 trials evaluating each of these regimens in comparison to efavirenz, emtricitabine...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Josep M Llibre, François Raffi, Graeme Moyle, Georg Behrens, Stephane Bouee, Geraldine Reilly, Peter Borg, David Piontkowsky, Felipe Rogatto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4872996?pdf=render
id doaj-5675cfcf33db412abc99cc1339a26148
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5675cfcf33db412abc99cc1339a261482020-11-24T21:54:59ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01115e015540610.1371/journal.pone.0155406An Indirect Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Elvitegravir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and Abacavir/Lamivudine + Dolutegravir in Initial Therapy.Josep M LlibreFrançois RaffiGraeme MoyleGeorg BehrensStephane BoueeGeraldine ReillyPeter BorgDavid PiontkowskyFelipe RogattoOBJECTIVES:The objective of this analysis is to perform an indirect comparison of elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine and tenofovir DF (E/C/F/TDF) to abacavir/lamivudine and dolutegravir (ABC/3TC + DTG) by using 2 trials evaluating each of these regimens in comparison to efavirenz, emtricitabine and tenofovir DF (EFV/FTC/TDF). METHODS:An indirect comparison was performed by using a generalization of Bucher's methodology to calculate risk differences. Two phase III clinical trials (GS-US-236-0102 and SINGLE-described above) were used. RESULTS:Results of the indirect comparison showed no statistically significant risk difference of the efficacy endpoint of achieving HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL between E/C/F/TDF and ABC/3TC + DTG for the ITT population at weeks 48, 96 and 144: respectively -3.7% (CI95% = [-10.8%; 3.4%]), -5.2% (CI95% = [-13.2%; 2.8%]) and -3.1% (CI95% = [-12.0%; 5.7%]). There was no statistically significant differences in the risk difference for serious adverse events (5.7% (CI95% = [-2.2%; 12.3%])), drug related adverse event (2.7% (CI95% = [-7.0%;12.4%])), drug related serious adverse event (0.8% (CI95% = [-1.6%;3.2%])) and death (0.5% (CI95% = [-0.8%;1.8%])), respectively, between E/C/F/TDF and ABC/3TC + DTG. A significant difference was found for discontinuation due to adverse events with a higher rate for E/C/F/TDF (difference = 8.6% (CI95% = [3.3%; 13.9%])). There was also no statistically significant risk difference of the viral resistance of 1.2% (CI95% = [-1.2; 3.7]) between E/C/F/TDF and ABC/3TC + DTG at week 48, 1.7% at week 96 (CI95% = [-1.1; 4.5]) and 2.2% (CI95% = [-1.0; 5.4]) at week 144.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4872996?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Josep M Llibre
François Raffi
Graeme Moyle
Georg Behrens
Stephane Bouee
Geraldine Reilly
Peter Borg
David Piontkowsky
Felipe Rogatto
spellingShingle Josep M Llibre
François Raffi
Graeme Moyle
Georg Behrens
Stephane Bouee
Geraldine Reilly
Peter Borg
David Piontkowsky
Felipe Rogatto
An Indirect Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Elvitegravir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and Abacavir/Lamivudine + Dolutegravir in Initial Therapy.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Josep M Llibre
François Raffi
Graeme Moyle
Georg Behrens
Stephane Bouee
Geraldine Reilly
Peter Borg
David Piontkowsky
Felipe Rogatto
author_sort Josep M Llibre
title An Indirect Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Elvitegravir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and Abacavir/Lamivudine + Dolutegravir in Initial Therapy.
title_short An Indirect Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Elvitegravir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and Abacavir/Lamivudine + Dolutegravir in Initial Therapy.
title_full An Indirect Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Elvitegravir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and Abacavir/Lamivudine + Dolutegravir in Initial Therapy.
title_fullStr An Indirect Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Elvitegravir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and Abacavir/Lamivudine + Dolutegravir in Initial Therapy.
title_full_unstemmed An Indirect Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Elvitegravir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and Abacavir/Lamivudine + Dolutegravir in Initial Therapy.
title_sort indirect comparison of efficacy and safety of elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and abacavir/lamivudine + dolutegravir in initial therapy.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description OBJECTIVES:The objective of this analysis is to perform an indirect comparison of elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine and tenofovir DF (E/C/F/TDF) to abacavir/lamivudine and dolutegravir (ABC/3TC + DTG) by using 2 trials evaluating each of these regimens in comparison to efavirenz, emtricitabine and tenofovir DF (EFV/FTC/TDF). METHODS:An indirect comparison was performed by using a generalization of Bucher's methodology to calculate risk differences. Two phase III clinical trials (GS-US-236-0102 and SINGLE-described above) were used. RESULTS:Results of the indirect comparison showed no statistically significant risk difference of the efficacy endpoint of achieving HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL between E/C/F/TDF and ABC/3TC + DTG for the ITT population at weeks 48, 96 and 144: respectively -3.7% (CI95% = [-10.8%; 3.4%]), -5.2% (CI95% = [-13.2%; 2.8%]) and -3.1% (CI95% = [-12.0%; 5.7%]). There was no statistically significant differences in the risk difference for serious adverse events (5.7% (CI95% = [-2.2%; 12.3%])), drug related adverse event (2.7% (CI95% = [-7.0%;12.4%])), drug related serious adverse event (0.8% (CI95% = [-1.6%;3.2%])) and death (0.5% (CI95% = [-0.8%;1.8%])), respectively, between E/C/F/TDF and ABC/3TC + DTG. A significant difference was found for discontinuation due to adverse events with a higher rate for E/C/F/TDF (difference = 8.6% (CI95% = [3.3%; 13.9%])). There was also no statistically significant risk difference of the viral resistance of 1.2% (CI95% = [-1.2; 3.7]) between E/C/F/TDF and ABC/3TC + DTG at week 48, 1.7% at week 96 (CI95% = [-1.1; 4.5]) and 2.2% (CI95% = [-1.0; 5.4]) at week 144.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4872996?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT josepmllibre anindirectcomparisonofefficacyandsafetyofelvitegravircobicistatemtricitabinetenofovirdisoproxilfumarateandabacavirlamivudinedolutegravirininitialtherapy
AT francoisraffi anindirectcomparisonofefficacyandsafetyofelvitegravircobicistatemtricitabinetenofovirdisoproxilfumarateandabacavirlamivudinedolutegravirininitialtherapy
AT graememoyle anindirectcomparisonofefficacyandsafetyofelvitegravircobicistatemtricitabinetenofovirdisoproxilfumarateandabacavirlamivudinedolutegravirininitialtherapy
AT georgbehrens anindirectcomparisonofefficacyandsafetyofelvitegravircobicistatemtricitabinetenofovirdisoproxilfumarateandabacavirlamivudinedolutegravirininitialtherapy
AT stephanebouee anindirectcomparisonofefficacyandsafetyofelvitegravircobicistatemtricitabinetenofovirdisoproxilfumarateandabacavirlamivudinedolutegravirininitialtherapy
AT geraldinereilly anindirectcomparisonofefficacyandsafetyofelvitegravircobicistatemtricitabinetenofovirdisoproxilfumarateandabacavirlamivudinedolutegravirininitialtherapy
AT peterborg anindirectcomparisonofefficacyandsafetyofelvitegravircobicistatemtricitabinetenofovirdisoproxilfumarateandabacavirlamivudinedolutegravirininitialtherapy
AT davidpiontkowsky anindirectcomparisonofefficacyandsafetyofelvitegravircobicistatemtricitabinetenofovirdisoproxilfumarateandabacavirlamivudinedolutegravirininitialtherapy
AT feliperogatto anindirectcomparisonofefficacyandsafetyofelvitegravircobicistatemtricitabinetenofovirdisoproxilfumarateandabacavirlamivudinedolutegravirininitialtherapy
AT josepmllibre indirectcomparisonofefficacyandsafetyofelvitegravircobicistatemtricitabinetenofovirdisoproxilfumarateandabacavirlamivudinedolutegravirininitialtherapy
AT francoisraffi indirectcomparisonofefficacyandsafetyofelvitegravircobicistatemtricitabinetenofovirdisoproxilfumarateandabacavirlamivudinedolutegravirininitialtherapy
AT graememoyle indirectcomparisonofefficacyandsafetyofelvitegravircobicistatemtricitabinetenofovirdisoproxilfumarateandabacavirlamivudinedolutegravirininitialtherapy
AT georgbehrens indirectcomparisonofefficacyandsafetyofelvitegravircobicistatemtricitabinetenofovirdisoproxilfumarateandabacavirlamivudinedolutegravirininitialtherapy
AT stephanebouee indirectcomparisonofefficacyandsafetyofelvitegravircobicistatemtricitabinetenofovirdisoproxilfumarateandabacavirlamivudinedolutegravirininitialtherapy
AT geraldinereilly indirectcomparisonofefficacyandsafetyofelvitegravircobicistatemtricitabinetenofovirdisoproxilfumarateandabacavirlamivudinedolutegravirininitialtherapy
AT peterborg indirectcomparisonofefficacyandsafetyofelvitegravircobicistatemtricitabinetenofovirdisoproxilfumarateandabacavirlamivudinedolutegravirininitialtherapy
AT davidpiontkowsky indirectcomparisonofefficacyandsafetyofelvitegravircobicistatemtricitabinetenofovirdisoproxilfumarateandabacavirlamivudinedolutegravirininitialtherapy
AT feliperogatto indirectcomparisonofefficacyandsafetyofelvitegravircobicistatemtricitabinetenofovirdisoproxilfumarateandabacavirlamivudinedolutegravirininitialtherapy
_version_ 1725864523925028864