Suture Closure versus Non-Closure of Subcutaneous Fat and Cosmetic Outcome after Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION:To investigate the effect of subcutaneous fat suture closure versus non-closure at cesarean section (CS) on long-term cosmetic outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS:Women undergoing planned or unplanned CS were randomized to either subcutaneous fat suture closure or non-closure using a 1∶1 allo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Heinrich Husslein, Martina Gutschi, Heinz Leipold, Christoph Herbst, Maximilian Franz, Christof Worda
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4262443?pdf=render
id doaj-5679e4a909e04d6da84009dbc3e8356b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5679e4a909e04d6da84009dbc3e8356b2020-11-25T01:24:15ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-01912e11473010.1371/journal.pone.0114730Suture Closure versus Non-Closure of Subcutaneous Fat and Cosmetic Outcome after Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Heinrich HussleinMartina GutschiHeinz LeipoldChristoph HerbstMaximilian FranzChristof WordaINTRODUCTION:To investigate the effect of subcutaneous fat suture closure versus non-closure at cesarean section (CS) on long-term cosmetic outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS:Women undergoing planned or unplanned CS were randomized to either subcutaneous fat suture closure or non-closure using a 1∶1 allocation algorithm. Participants and outcome assessors were blinded to group allocation. Scar evaluation was performed after two and six months. Primary outcome measures were Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) summary scores six months after surgery. Secondary outcome measures were Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) summary scores, retraction of the scar below the level of the surrounding skin, duration of surgery, and development of hematoma, seroma, surgical site infection (SSI) or wound disruption. Data were analyzed according to the intention to treat principle. RESULTS:A total of 116 women were randomized and 91 participants, 47 in the closure and 44 in the non-closure group, completed the trial and were analyzed. There were no differences in patient morphometrics or surgery indications between groups. At two and six months no significant differences were found with respect to POSAS or VSS scores between groups. After two months significantly more women in the non-closure group described their scar as being retracted below the level of the skin (36% vs. 15%, p = 0.02) whereas no difference was observed at six months. There were significantly more hematomas in the non-closure (25%) compared to the closure group (4%) (p = 0.005). There was no difference in duration of surgery, SSI, seroma formation or wound disruption between groups. CONCLUSIONS:Suture closure of the subcutaneous fat at CS does not affect long-term cosmetic outcome. (Level I evidence). TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01542346.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4262443?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Heinrich Husslein
Martina Gutschi
Heinz Leipold
Christoph Herbst
Maximilian Franz
Christof Worda
spellingShingle Heinrich Husslein
Martina Gutschi
Heinz Leipold
Christoph Herbst
Maximilian Franz
Christof Worda
Suture Closure versus Non-Closure of Subcutaneous Fat and Cosmetic Outcome after Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Heinrich Husslein
Martina Gutschi
Heinz Leipold
Christoph Herbst
Maximilian Franz
Christof Worda
author_sort Heinrich Husslein
title Suture Closure versus Non-Closure of Subcutaneous Fat and Cosmetic Outcome after Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
title_short Suture Closure versus Non-Closure of Subcutaneous Fat and Cosmetic Outcome after Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
title_full Suture Closure versus Non-Closure of Subcutaneous Fat and Cosmetic Outcome after Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
title_fullStr Suture Closure versus Non-Closure of Subcutaneous Fat and Cosmetic Outcome after Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
title_full_unstemmed Suture Closure versus Non-Closure of Subcutaneous Fat and Cosmetic Outcome after Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
title_sort suture closure versus non-closure of subcutaneous fat and cosmetic outcome after cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description INTRODUCTION:To investigate the effect of subcutaneous fat suture closure versus non-closure at cesarean section (CS) on long-term cosmetic outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS:Women undergoing planned or unplanned CS were randomized to either subcutaneous fat suture closure or non-closure using a 1∶1 allocation algorithm. Participants and outcome assessors were blinded to group allocation. Scar evaluation was performed after two and six months. Primary outcome measures were Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) summary scores six months after surgery. Secondary outcome measures were Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) summary scores, retraction of the scar below the level of the surrounding skin, duration of surgery, and development of hematoma, seroma, surgical site infection (SSI) or wound disruption. Data were analyzed according to the intention to treat principle. RESULTS:A total of 116 women were randomized and 91 participants, 47 in the closure and 44 in the non-closure group, completed the trial and were analyzed. There were no differences in patient morphometrics or surgery indications between groups. At two and six months no significant differences were found with respect to POSAS or VSS scores between groups. After two months significantly more women in the non-closure group described their scar as being retracted below the level of the skin (36% vs. 15%, p = 0.02) whereas no difference was observed at six months. There were significantly more hematomas in the non-closure (25%) compared to the closure group (4%) (p = 0.005). There was no difference in duration of surgery, SSI, seroma formation or wound disruption between groups. CONCLUSIONS:Suture closure of the subcutaneous fat at CS does not affect long-term cosmetic outcome. (Level I evidence). TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01542346.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4262443?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT heinrichhusslein sutureclosureversusnonclosureofsubcutaneousfatandcosmeticoutcomeaftercesareansectionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT martinagutschi sutureclosureversusnonclosureofsubcutaneousfatandcosmeticoutcomeaftercesareansectionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT heinzleipold sutureclosureversusnonclosureofsubcutaneousfatandcosmeticoutcomeaftercesareansectionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT christophherbst sutureclosureversusnonclosureofsubcutaneousfatandcosmeticoutcomeaftercesareansectionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT maximilianfranz sutureclosureversusnonclosureofsubcutaneousfatandcosmeticoutcomeaftercesareansectionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT christofworda sutureclosureversusnonclosureofsubcutaneousfatandcosmeticoutcomeaftercesareansectionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1725118035800358912