Decision making nomogram for intrastromal corneal ring segments in keratoconus

Purpose: To create a nomogram for the insertion of intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) (Intacs® ) in eyes with keratoconus. Setting: Tertiary eye care center in South India. Materials and Methods: This prospective, non-randomized, interventional case series used a self-designed decision-making...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rohit Shetty, Sharon D′Souza, Sarika Ramachandran, Mathew Kurian, Rudy M M A Nuijts
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2014-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2014;volume=62;issue=1;spage=23;epage=28;aulast=Shetty
id doaj-567c57595fa14d0c90be60729ea1a8e0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-567c57595fa14d0c90be60729ea1a8e02020-11-25T01:06:12ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Ophthalmology0301-47381998-36892014-01-01621232810.4103/0301-4738.126170Decision making nomogram for intrastromal corneal ring segments in keratoconusRohit ShettySharon D′SouzaSarika RamachandranMathew KurianRudy M M A NuijtsPurpose: To create a nomogram for the insertion of intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) (Intacs® ) in eyes with keratoconus. Setting: Tertiary eye care center in South India. Materials and Methods: This prospective, non-randomized, interventional case series used a self-designed decision-making nomogram for the selection of ICRS in keratoconus patients based on the centration of the cone, mean refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE), and mean keratometry (Km) values. The 3, 6, and 12 months clinical outcomes were compared to historical controls. Primary endpoints were improvement in uncorrected and best-corrected vision and change in the keratometric values. Results: Group A comprised of 52 eyes of 50 patients that followed the nomogram, while Group B comprised of 25 eyes of 23 non-nomogram historical controls matched for baseline parameters.In Group A, the uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) improved from 0.16 ± 0.15 to 0.25 ± 0.16 (P < 0.001), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) from 0.58 ± 0.2 to 0.69 ± 0.21 (P = 0.022), MRSE from -5.41 ± 4.94 to -1.71 ± 2.88 (P < 0.001), Km from 51.77 ± 5.45 to 48.63 ± 4.37 (P < 0.001), and astigmatism reduced from 5.86 ± 2.61 to 4.91 ± 2.72 diopters (P < 0.001).In Group B, improvement in the average MRSE was from -6.44 ± 5.32 to -3.26 ± 2.82 (P < 0.013) and in the average Km from 53.64 ± 5.32 to 50.31 ± 5.02 (P < 0.001). Other parameters did not improve significantly.A statistically significant difference was present in the percentage of patients achieving a good clinical outcome between the two groups (P < 0.001; Chi-square). Conclusion: The nomogram provides a means to choose the appropriate ICRS, hence improving the outcome in patients with keratoconus.http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2014;volume=62;issue=1;spage=23;epage=28;aulast=ShettyLasikcorneal scarscorneoplastiquepremium cataract surgeryrefractive complicationsradial keratotomypterygiumpingueculaastigmatismcorneal scarsAntioxidantselectromagnetic rationglutathionelensoxidative stress2-ethylpyridineapoptosisARPE-19 cellscigarette smoke toxicantmitochondrial membrane potentialreactive oxygen/nitrogen speciesIntacskeratoconusnomogram
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rohit Shetty
Sharon D′Souza
Sarika Ramachandran
Mathew Kurian
Rudy M M A Nuijts
spellingShingle Rohit Shetty
Sharon D′Souza
Sarika Ramachandran
Mathew Kurian
Rudy M M A Nuijts
Decision making nomogram for intrastromal corneal ring segments in keratoconus
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Lasik
corneal scars
corneoplastique
premium cataract surgery
refractive complications
radial keratotomy
pterygium
pinguecula
astigmatism
corneal scars
Antioxidants
electromagnetic ration
glutathione
lens
oxidative stress
2-ethylpyridine
apoptosis
ARPE-19 cells
cigarette smoke toxicant
mitochondrial membrane potential
reactive oxygen/nitrogen species
Intacs
keratoconus
nomogram
author_facet Rohit Shetty
Sharon D′Souza
Sarika Ramachandran
Mathew Kurian
Rudy M M A Nuijts
author_sort Rohit Shetty
title Decision making nomogram for intrastromal corneal ring segments in keratoconus
title_short Decision making nomogram for intrastromal corneal ring segments in keratoconus
title_full Decision making nomogram for intrastromal corneal ring segments in keratoconus
title_fullStr Decision making nomogram for intrastromal corneal ring segments in keratoconus
title_full_unstemmed Decision making nomogram for intrastromal corneal ring segments in keratoconus
title_sort decision making nomogram for intrastromal corneal ring segments in keratoconus
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
issn 0301-4738
1998-3689
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Purpose: To create a nomogram for the insertion of intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) (Intacs® ) in eyes with keratoconus. Setting: Tertiary eye care center in South India. Materials and Methods: This prospective, non-randomized, interventional case series used a self-designed decision-making nomogram for the selection of ICRS in keratoconus patients based on the centration of the cone, mean refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE), and mean keratometry (Km) values. The 3, 6, and 12 months clinical outcomes were compared to historical controls. Primary endpoints were improvement in uncorrected and best-corrected vision and change in the keratometric values. Results: Group A comprised of 52 eyes of 50 patients that followed the nomogram, while Group B comprised of 25 eyes of 23 non-nomogram historical controls matched for baseline parameters.In Group A, the uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) improved from 0.16 ± 0.15 to 0.25 ± 0.16 (P < 0.001), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) from 0.58 ± 0.2 to 0.69 ± 0.21 (P = 0.022), MRSE from -5.41 ± 4.94 to -1.71 ± 2.88 (P < 0.001), Km from 51.77 ± 5.45 to 48.63 ± 4.37 (P < 0.001), and astigmatism reduced from 5.86 ± 2.61 to 4.91 ± 2.72 diopters (P < 0.001).In Group B, improvement in the average MRSE was from -6.44 ± 5.32 to -3.26 ± 2.82 (P < 0.013) and in the average Km from 53.64 ± 5.32 to 50.31 ± 5.02 (P < 0.001). Other parameters did not improve significantly.A statistically significant difference was present in the percentage of patients achieving a good clinical outcome between the two groups (P < 0.001; Chi-square). Conclusion: The nomogram provides a means to choose the appropriate ICRS, hence improving the outcome in patients with keratoconus.
topic Lasik
corneal scars
corneoplastique
premium cataract surgery
refractive complications
radial keratotomy
pterygium
pinguecula
astigmatism
corneal scars
Antioxidants
electromagnetic ration
glutathione
lens
oxidative stress
2-ethylpyridine
apoptosis
ARPE-19 cells
cigarette smoke toxicant
mitochondrial membrane potential
reactive oxygen/nitrogen species
Intacs
keratoconus
nomogram
url http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2014;volume=62;issue=1;spage=23;epage=28;aulast=Shetty
work_keys_str_mv AT rohitshetty decisionmakingnomogramforintrastromalcornealringsegmentsinkeratoconus
AT sharondsouza decisionmakingnomogramforintrastromalcornealringsegmentsinkeratoconus
AT sarikaramachandran decisionmakingnomogramforintrastromalcornealringsegmentsinkeratoconus
AT mathewkurian decisionmakingnomogramforintrastromalcornealringsegmentsinkeratoconus
AT rudymmanuijts decisionmakingnomogramforintrastromalcornealringsegmentsinkeratoconus
_version_ 1725190808867438592