Sensing Archaeology in the North: The Use of Non-Destructive Geophysical and Remote Sensing Methods in Archaeology in Scandinavian and North Atlantic Territories

In August 2018, a group of experts working with terrestrial/marine geophysics and remote sensing methods to explore archaeological sites in Denmark, Finland, Norway, Scotland and Sweden gathered together for the first time at the Workshop ‘Sensing Archaeology in The North’. The goal was to exchange...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carmen Cuenca-García, Ole Risbøl, C. Richard Bates, Arne Anderson Stamnes, Fredrik Skoglund, Øyvind Ødegård, Andreas Viberg, Satu Koivisto, Mikkel Fuglsang, Manuel Gabler, Esben Schlosser Mauritsen, Wesa Perttola, Dag-Øyvind Solem
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-09-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/18/3102
id doaj-567d11ff54b045cf8e447cb92889d595
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Carmen Cuenca-García
Ole Risbøl
C. Richard Bates
Arne Anderson Stamnes
Fredrik Skoglund
Øyvind Ødegård
Andreas Viberg
Satu Koivisto
Mikkel Fuglsang
Manuel Gabler
Esben Schlosser Mauritsen
Wesa Perttola
Dag-Øyvind Solem
spellingShingle Carmen Cuenca-García
Ole Risbøl
C. Richard Bates
Arne Anderson Stamnes
Fredrik Skoglund
Øyvind Ødegård
Andreas Viberg
Satu Koivisto
Mikkel Fuglsang
Manuel Gabler
Esben Schlosser Mauritsen
Wesa Perttola
Dag-Øyvind Solem
Sensing Archaeology in the North: The Use of Non-Destructive Geophysical and Remote Sensing Methods in Archaeology in Scandinavian and North Atlantic Territories
Remote Sensing
remote sensing
near-surface geophysics
archaeological geophysics
marine archaeology
archaeological prospection
aerial archaeology
author_facet Carmen Cuenca-García
Ole Risbøl
C. Richard Bates
Arne Anderson Stamnes
Fredrik Skoglund
Øyvind Ødegård
Andreas Viberg
Satu Koivisto
Mikkel Fuglsang
Manuel Gabler
Esben Schlosser Mauritsen
Wesa Perttola
Dag-Øyvind Solem
author_sort Carmen Cuenca-García
title Sensing Archaeology in the North: The Use of Non-Destructive Geophysical and Remote Sensing Methods in Archaeology in Scandinavian and North Atlantic Territories
title_short Sensing Archaeology in the North: The Use of Non-Destructive Geophysical and Remote Sensing Methods in Archaeology in Scandinavian and North Atlantic Territories
title_full Sensing Archaeology in the North: The Use of Non-Destructive Geophysical and Remote Sensing Methods in Archaeology in Scandinavian and North Atlantic Territories
title_fullStr Sensing Archaeology in the North: The Use of Non-Destructive Geophysical and Remote Sensing Methods in Archaeology in Scandinavian and North Atlantic Territories
title_full_unstemmed Sensing Archaeology in the North: The Use of Non-Destructive Geophysical and Remote Sensing Methods in Archaeology in Scandinavian and North Atlantic Territories
title_sort sensing archaeology in the north: the use of non-destructive geophysical and remote sensing methods in archaeology in scandinavian and north atlantic territories
publisher MDPI AG
series Remote Sensing
issn 2072-4292
publishDate 2020-09-01
description In August 2018, a group of experts working with terrestrial/marine geophysics and remote sensing methods to explore archaeological sites in Denmark, Finland, Norway, Scotland and Sweden gathered together for the first time at the Workshop ‘Sensing Archaeology in The North’. The goal was to exchange experiences, discuss challenges, and consider future directions for further developing these methods and strategies for their use in archaeology. After the event, this special journal issue was arranged to publish papers that are based on the workshop presentations, but also to incorporate work that is produced by other researchers in the field. This paper closes the special issue and further aims to provide current state-of-the-art for the methods represented by the workshop. Here, we introduce the aspects that inspired the organisation of the meeting, a summary of the 12 presentations and eight paper contributions, as well as a discussion about the main outcomes of the workshop roundtables, including the production of two searchable databases (online resources and equipment). We conclude with the position that the ‘North’, together with its unique cultural heritage and thriving research community, is at the forefront of good practice in the application and development of sensing methods in archaeological research and management. However, further method development is required, so we claim the support of funding bodies to back research efforts based on testing/experimental studies to: explore unknown survey environments and identify optimal survey conditions, as well as to monitor the preservation of archaeological remains, especially those that are at risk. It is demonstrated that remote sensing and geophysics not only have an important role in the safeguarding of archaeological sites from development and within prehistorical-historical research, but the methods can be especially useful in recording and monitoring the increased impact of climate change on sites in the North.
topic remote sensing
near-surface geophysics
archaeological geophysics
marine archaeology
archaeological prospection
aerial archaeology
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/18/3102
work_keys_str_mv AT carmencuencagarcia sensingarchaeologyinthenorththeuseofnondestructivegeophysicalandremotesensingmethodsinarchaeologyinscandinavianandnorthatlanticterritories
AT olerisbøl sensingarchaeologyinthenorththeuseofnondestructivegeophysicalandremotesensingmethodsinarchaeologyinscandinavianandnorthatlanticterritories
AT crichardbates sensingarchaeologyinthenorththeuseofnondestructivegeophysicalandremotesensingmethodsinarchaeologyinscandinavianandnorthatlanticterritories
AT arneandersonstamnes sensingarchaeologyinthenorththeuseofnondestructivegeophysicalandremotesensingmethodsinarchaeologyinscandinavianandnorthatlanticterritories
AT fredrikskoglund sensingarchaeologyinthenorththeuseofnondestructivegeophysicalandremotesensingmethodsinarchaeologyinscandinavianandnorthatlanticterritories
AT øyvindødegard sensingarchaeologyinthenorththeuseofnondestructivegeophysicalandremotesensingmethodsinarchaeologyinscandinavianandnorthatlanticterritories
AT andreasviberg sensingarchaeologyinthenorththeuseofnondestructivegeophysicalandremotesensingmethodsinarchaeologyinscandinavianandnorthatlanticterritories
AT satukoivisto sensingarchaeologyinthenorththeuseofnondestructivegeophysicalandremotesensingmethodsinarchaeologyinscandinavianandnorthatlanticterritories
AT mikkelfuglsang sensingarchaeologyinthenorththeuseofnondestructivegeophysicalandremotesensingmethodsinarchaeologyinscandinavianandnorthatlanticterritories
AT manuelgabler sensingarchaeologyinthenorththeuseofnondestructivegeophysicalandremotesensingmethodsinarchaeologyinscandinavianandnorthatlanticterritories
AT esbenschlossermauritsen sensingarchaeologyinthenorththeuseofnondestructivegeophysicalandremotesensingmethodsinarchaeologyinscandinavianandnorthatlanticterritories
AT wesaperttola sensingarchaeologyinthenorththeuseofnondestructivegeophysicalandremotesensingmethodsinarchaeologyinscandinavianandnorthatlanticterritories
AT dagøyvindsolem sensingarchaeologyinthenorththeuseofnondestructivegeophysicalandremotesensingmethodsinarchaeologyinscandinavianandnorthatlanticterritories
_version_ 1724535818650910720
spelling doaj-567d11ff54b045cf8e447cb92889d5952020-11-25T03:40:10ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922020-09-01123102310210.3390/rs12183102Sensing Archaeology in the North: The Use of Non-Destructive Geophysical and Remote Sensing Methods in Archaeology in Scandinavian and North Atlantic TerritoriesCarmen Cuenca-García0Ole Risbøl1C. Richard Bates2Arne Anderson Stamnes3Fredrik Skoglund4Øyvind Ødegård5Andreas Viberg6Satu Koivisto7Mikkel Fuglsang8Manuel Gabler9Esben Schlosser Mauritsen10Wesa Perttola11Dag-Øyvind Solem12Department of Archaeology and Cultural History, NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Erling Skakkes gate 47B, 7012 Trondheim, NorwayDepartment of Archaeology and Cultural History, NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Erling Skakkes gate 47B, 7012 Trondheim, NorwaySchool of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of St Andrews, St. Andrews, Fife, Scotland KY16 9AJ, UKDepartment of Archaeology and Cultural History, NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Erling Skakkes gate 47B, 7012 Trondheim, NorwayDepartment of Archaeology and Cultural History, NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Erling Skakkes gate 47B, 7012 Trondheim, NorwayDepartment of Archaeology and Cultural History, NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Erling Skakkes gate 47B, 7012 Trondheim, NorwayGuideline Geo-Malå/ABEM, SE -172 66 Sundbyberg, Sweden, <email>andreas.viberg@guidelinegeo.com</email>Department of Archaeology, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turku, FinlandMidtjylland Museum, 7400 Herning, DenmarkNorwegian Institute for Cultural Heritage Research, 0155 Oslo and 7013 Trondheim, NorwayDepartment of Archaeology, Ringkøbing-Skjern Museum/ARKVEST, 6900 Skjern, DenmarkDepartment of Cultures/Archaeology,University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, FinlandNorwegian Institute for Cultural Heritage Research, 0155 Oslo and 7013 Trondheim, NorwayIn August 2018, a group of experts working with terrestrial/marine geophysics and remote sensing methods to explore archaeological sites in Denmark, Finland, Norway, Scotland and Sweden gathered together for the first time at the Workshop ‘Sensing Archaeology in The North’. The goal was to exchange experiences, discuss challenges, and consider future directions for further developing these methods and strategies for their use in archaeology. After the event, this special journal issue was arranged to publish papers that are based on the workshop presentations, but also to incorporate work that is produced by other researchers in the field. This paper closes the special issue and further aims to provide current state-of-the-art for the methods represented by the workshop. Here, we introduce the aspects that inspired the organisation of the meeting, a summary of the 12 presentations and eight paper contributions, as well as a discussion about the main outcomes of the workshop roundtables, including the production of two searchable databases (online resources and equipment). We conclude with the position that the ‘North’, together with its unique cultural heritage and thriving research community, is at the forefront of good practice in the application and development of sensing methods in archaeological research and management. However, further method development is required, so we claim the support of funding bodies to back research efforts based on testing/experimental studies to: explore unknown survey environments and identify optimal survey conditions, as well as to monitor the preservation of archaeological remains, especially those that are at risk. It is demonstrated that remote sensing and geophysics not only have an important role in the safeguarding of archaeological sites from development and within prehistorical-historical research, but the methods can be especially useful in recording and monitoring the increased impact of climate change on sites in the North.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/18/3102remote sensingnear-surface geophysicsarchaeological geophysicsmarine archaeologyarchaeological prospectionaerial archaeology