Sensing Archaeology in the North: The Use of Non-Destructive Geophysical and Remote Sensing Methods in Archaeology in Scandinavian and North Atlantic Territories
In August 2018, a group of experts working with terrestrial/marine geophysics and remote sensing methods to explore archaeological sites in Denmark, Finland, Norway, Scotland and Sweden gathered together for the first time at the Workshop ‘Sensing Archaeology in The North’. The goal was to exchange...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-09-01
|
Series: | Remote Sensing |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/18/3102 |
id |
doaj-567d11ff54b045cf8e447cb92889d595 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Carmen Cuenca-García Ole Risbøl C. Richard Bates Arne Anderson Stamnes Fredrik Skoglund Øyvind Ødegård Andreas Viberg Satu Koivisto Mikkel Fuglsang Manuel Gabler Esben Schlosser Mauritsen Wesa Perttola Dag-Øyvind Solem |
spellingShingle |
Carmen Cuenca-García Ole Risbøl C. Richard Bates Arne Anderson Stamnes Fredrik Skoglund Øyvind Ødegård Andreas Viberg Satu Koivisto Mikkel Fuglsang Manuel Gabler Esben Schlosser Mauritsen Wesa Perttola Dag-Øyvind Solem Sensing Archaeology in the North: The Use of Non-Destructive Geophysical and Remote Sensing Methods in Archaeology in Scandinavian and North Atlantic Territories Remote Sensing remote sensing near-surface geophysics archaeological geophysics marine archaeology archaeological prospection aerial archaeology |
author_facet |
Carmen Cuenca-García Ole Risbøl C. Richard Bates Arne Anderson Stamnes Fredrik Skoglund Øyvind Ødegård Andreas Viberg Satu Koivisto Mikkel Fuglsang Manuel Gabler Esben Schlosser Mauritsen Wesa Perttola Dag-Øyvind Solem |
author_sort |
Carmen Cuenca-García |
title |
Sensing Archaeology in the North: The Use of Non-Destructive Geophysical and Remote Sensing Methods in Archaeology in Scandinavian and North Atlantic Territories |
title_short |
Sensing Archaeology in the North: The Use of Non-Destructive Geophysical and Remote Sensing Methods in Archaeology in Scandinavian and North Atlantic Territories |
title_full |
Sensing Archaeology in the North: The Use of Non-Destructive Geophysical and Remote Sensing Methods in Archaeology in Scandinavian and North Atlantic Territories |
title_fullStr |
Sensing Archaeology in the North: The Use of Non-Destructive Geophysical and Remote Sensing Methods in Archaeology in Scandinavian and North Atlantic Territories |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sensing Archaeology in the North: The Use of Non-Destructive Geophysical and Remote Sensing Methods in Archaeology in Scandinavian and North Atlantic Territories |
title_sort |
sensing archaeology in the north: the use of non-destructive geophysical and remote sensing methods in archaeology in scandinavian and north atlantic territories |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Remote Sensing |
issn |
2072-4292 |
publishDate |
2020-09-01 |
description |
In August 2018, a group of experts working with terrestrial/marine geophysics and remote sensing methods to explore archaeological sites in Denmark, Finland, Norway, Scotland and Sweden gathered together for the first time at the Workshop ‘Sensing Archaeology in The North’. The goal was to exchange experiences, discuss challenges, and consider future directions for further developing these methods and strategies for their use in archaeology. After the event, this special journal issue was arranged to publish papers that are based on the workshop presentations, but also to incorporate work that is produced by other researchers in the field. This paper closes the special issue and further aims to provide current state-of-the-art for the methods represented by the workshop. Here, we introduce the aspects that inspired the organisation of the meeting, a summary of the 12 presentations and eight paper contributions, as well as a discussion about the main outcomes of the workshop roundtables, including the production of two searchable databases (online resources and equipment). We conclude with the position that the ‘North’, together with its unique cultural heritage and thriving research community, is at the forefront of good practice in the application and development of sensing methods in archaeological research and management. However, further method development is required, so we claim the support of funding bodies to back research efforts based on testing/experimental studies to: explore unknown survey environments and identify optimal survey conditions, as well as to monitor the preservation of archaeological remains, especially those that are at risk. It is demonstrated that remote sensing and geophysics not only have an important role in the safeguarding of archaeological sites from development and within prehistorical-historical research, but the methods can be especially useful in recording and monitoring the increased impact of climate change on sites in the North. |
topic |
remote sensing near-surface geophysics archaeological geophysics marine archaeology archaeological prospection aerial archaeology |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/18/3102 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT carmencuencagarcia sensingarchaeologyinthenorththeuseofnondestructivegeophysicalandremotesensingmethodsinarchaeologyinscandinavianandnorthatlanticterritories AT olerisbøl sensingarchaeologyinthenorththeuseofnondestructivegeophysicalandremotesensingmethodsinarchaeologyinscandinavianandnorthatlanticterritories AT crichardbates sensingarchaeologyinthenorththeuseofnondestructivegeophysicalandremotesensingmethodsinarchaeologyinscandinavianandnorthatlanticterritories AT arneandersonstamnes sensingarchaeologyinthenorththeuseofnondestructivegeophysicalandremotesensingmethodsinarchaeologyinscandinavianandnorthatlanticterritories AT fredrikskoglund sensingarchaeologyinthenorththeuseofnondestructivegeophysicalandremotesensingmethodsinarchaeologyinscandinavianandnorthatlanticterritories AT øyvindødegard sensingarchaeologyinthenorththeuseofnondestructivegeophysicalandremotesensingmethodsinarchaeologyinscandinavianandnorthatlanticterritories AT andreasviberg sensingarchaeologyinthenorththeuseofnondestructivegeophysicalandremotesensingmethodsinarchaeologyinscandinavianandnorthatlanticterritories AT satukoivisto sensingarchaeologyinthenorththeuseofnondestructivegeophysicalandremotesensingmethodsinarchaeologyinscandinavianandnorthatlanticterritories AT mikkelfuglsang sensingarchaeologyinthenorththeuseofnondestructivegeophysicalandremotesensingmethodsinarchaeologyinscandinavianandnorthatlanticterritories AT manuelgabler sensingarchaeologyinthenorththeuseofnondestructivegeophysicalandremotesensingmethodsinarchaeologyinscandinavianandnorthatlanticterritories AT esbenschlossermauritsen sensingarchaeologyinthenorththeuseofnondestructivegeophysicalandremotesensingmethodsinarchaeologyinscandinavianandnorthatlanticterritories AT wesaperttola sensingarchaeologyinthenorththeuseofnondestructivegeophysicalandremotesensingmethodsinarchaeologyinscandinavianandnorthatlanticterritories AT dagøyvindsolem sensingarchaeologyinthenorththeuseofnondestructivegeophysicalandremotesensingmethodsinarchaeologyinscandinavianandnorthatlanticterritories |
_version_ |
1724535818650910720 |
spelling |
doaj-567d11ff54b045cf8e447cb92889d5952020-11-25T03:40:10ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922020-09-01123102310210.3390/rs12183102Sensing Archaeology in the North: The Use of Non-Destructive Geophysical and Remote Sensing Methods in Archaeology in Scandinavian and North Atlantic TerritoriesCarmen Cuenca-García0Ole Risbøl1C. Richard Bates2Arne Anderson Stamnes3Fredrik Skoglund4Øyvind Ødegård5Andreas Viberg6Satu Koivisto7Mikkel Fuglsang8Manuel Gabler9Esben Schlosser Mauritsen10Wesa Perttola11Dag-Øyvind Solem12Department of Archaeology and Cultural History, NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Erling Skakkes gate 47B, 7012 Trondheim, NorwayDepartment of Archaeology and Cultural History, NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Erling Skakkes gate 47B, 7012 Trondheim, NorwaySchool of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of St Andrews, St. Andrews, Fife, Scotland KY16 9AJ, UKDepartment of Archaeology and Cultural History, NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Erling Skakkes gate 47B, 7012 Trondheim, NorwayDepartment of Archaeology and Cultural History, NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Erling Skakkes gate 47B, 7012 Trondheim, NorwayDepartment of Archaeology and Cultural History, NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Erling Skakkes gate 47B, 7012 Trondheim, NorwayGuideline Geo-Malå/ABEM, SE -172 66 Sundbyberg, Sweden, <email>andreas.viberg@guidelinegeo.com</email>Department of Archaeology, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turku, FinlandMidtjylland Museum, 7400 Herning, DenmarkNorwegian Institute for Cultural Heritage Research, 0155 Oslo and 7013 Trondheim, NorwayDepartment of Archaeology, Ringkøbing-Skjern Museum/ARKVEST, 6900 Skjern, DenmarkDepartment of Cultures/Archaeology,University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, FinlandNorwegian Institute for Cultural Heritage Research, 0155 Oslo and 7013 Trondheim, NorwayIn August 2018, a group of experts working with terrestrial/marine geophysics and remote sensing methods to explore archaeological sites in Denmark, Finland, Norway, Scotland and Sweden gathered together for the first time at the Workshop ‘Sensing Archaeology in The North’. The goal was to exchange experiences, discuss challenges, and consider future directions for further developing these methods and strategies for their use in archaeology. After the event, this special journal issue was arranged to publish papers that are based on the workshop presentations, but also to incorporate work that is produced by other researchers in the field. This paper closes the special issue and further aims to provide current state-of-the-art for the methods represented by the workshop. Here, we introduce the aspects that inspired the organisation of the meeting, a summary of the 12 presentations and eight paper contributions, as well as a discussion about the main outcomes of the workshop roundtables, including the production of two searchable databases (online resources and equipment). We conclude with the position that the ‘North’, together with its unique cultural heritage and thriving research community, is at the forefront of good practice in the application and development of sensing methods in archaeological research and management. However, further method development is required, so we claim the support of funding bodies to back research efforts based on testing/experimental studies to: explore unknown survey environments and identify optimal survey conditions, as well as to monitor the preservation of archaeological remains, especially those that are at risk. It is demonstrated that remote sensing and geophysics not only have an important role in the safeguarding of archaeological sites from development and within prehistorical-historical research, but the methods can be especially useful in recording and monitoring the increased impact of climate change on sites in the North.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/18/3102remote sensingnear-surface geophysicsarchaeological geophysicsmarine archaeologyarchaeological prospectionaerial archaeology |