Lessons learned from Integrated Management Program Advancing Community Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (IMPACT-AF): a pragmatic clinical trial of computerized decision support in primary care

• Main Authors: Joanna M. Nemis-White, Laura M. Hamilton, Sarah Shaw, James H. MacKillop, Ratika Parkash, Shurjeel H. Choudhri, Antonio Ciaccia, Feng Xie, Lehana Thabane, Jafna L. Cox, for the IMPACT-AF Investigators
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: BMC 2021-08-01
• Series: Trials
• Subjects: Atrial fibrillation; Clinical trials; Informatics; Clinical decision support
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05488-y

Abstract Background Integrated Management Program Advancing Community Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (IMPACT-AF) was a pragmatic, cluster randomized trial assessing the effectiveness of a clinical decision support (CDS) tool in primary care, Nova Scotia, Canada. We evaluated if CDS software versus Usual Care could help primary care providers (PCPs) deliver individualized guideline-based AF patient care. Methods Key study challenges including CDS development and implementation, recruitment, and data integration documented over the trial duration are presented as lessons learned. Results Adequate resources must be allocated for software development, updates and feasibility testing. Development took longer than projected. End-user feedback suggested network access and broadband speeds impeded uptake; they felt further that the CDS was not sufficiently user-friendly or efficient in supporting AF care (i.e., repetitive alerts). Integration across e-platforms is crucial. Intellectual property and other issues prohibited CDS integration within electronic medical records and provincial e-health platforms. Double login and data entry were impediments to participation or reasons for provider withdrawal. Data integration challenges prevented easy and timely data access, analysis, and reporting. Primary care study recruitment is resource intensive. Altogether, 203 PCPs and 1145 of their patients participated, representing 25% of eligible providers and 12% of AF patients in Nova Scotia, respectively. The most effective provider recruitment strategy was in-office, small group lunch-and-learns. PCPs with past research experience or who led patient consent were top recruiters. The study office played a pivotal role in achieving patient recruitment targets. Conclusions A rapid growth in healthcare data is leading to widespread development of CDS. Our experience found practical issues to address for such applications to succeed. Feasibility testing to assess the utility of any healthcare CDS prior to implementation is recommended. Adequate resources are necessary to support successful recruitment for future pragmatic trials. CDS tools that integrate multiple co-morbid guidelines across eHealth platforms should be pursued. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01927367. Registered on August 22, 2013