Suitable CO<sub>2</sub> Solubility Models for Determination of the CO<sub>2</sub> Removal Performance of Oxygenators

CO<sub>2</sub> removal via membrane oxygenators during lung protective ventilation has become a reliable clinical technique. For further optimization of oxygenators, accurate prediction of the CO<sub>2</sub> removal rate is necessary. It can either be determined by measuring...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Benjamin Lukitsch, Paul Ecker, Martin Elenkov, Christoph Janeczek, Christian Jordan, Claus G. Krenn, Roman Ullrich, Margit Gfoehler, Michael Harasek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-03-01
Series:Bioengineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/8/3/33
id doaj-56c13f0a5eb046b0bbea89cbabe5e0d3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-56c13f0a5eb046b0bbea89cbabe5e0d32021-03-03T00:05:51ZengMDPI AGBioengineering2306-53542021-03-018333310.3390/bioengineering8030033Suitable CO<sub>2</sub> Solubility Models for Determination of the CO<sub>2</sub> Removal Performance of OxygenatorsBenjamin Lukitsch0Paul Ecker1Martin Elenkov2Christoph Janeczek3Christian Jordan4Claus G. Krenn5Roman Ullrich6Margit Gfoehler7Michael Harasek8Institute of Chemical, Environmental and Bioscience Engineering, TU Wien, 1060 Vienna, AustriaInstitute of Chemical, Environmental and Bioscience Engineering, TU Wien, 1060 Vienna, AustriaCCORE Technology GmbH, 1040 Vienna, AustriaCCORE Technology GmbH, 1040 Vienna, AustriaInstitute of Chemical, Environmental and Bioscience Engineering, TU Wien, 1060 Vienna, AustriaCCORE Technology GmbH, 1040 Vienna, AustriaCCORE Technology GmbH, 1040 Vienna, AustriaInstitute of Engineering Design and Product Development, TU Wien, 1060 Vienna, AustriaInstitute of Chemical, Environmental and Bioscience Engineering, TU Wien, 1060 Vienna, AustriaCO<sub>2</sub> removal via membrane oxygenators during lung protective ventilation has become a reliable clinical technique. For further optimization of oxygenators, accurate prediction of the CO<sub>2</sub> removal rate is necessary. It can either be determined by measuring the CO<sub>2</sub> content in the exhaust gas of the oxygenator (sweep flow-based) or using blood gas analyzer data and a CO<sub>2</sub> solubility model (blood-based). In this study, we determined the CO<sub>2</sub> removal rate of a prototype oxygenator utilizing both methods in in vitro trials with bovine and in vivo trials with porcine blood. While the sweep flow-based method is reliably accurate, the blood-based method depends on the accuracy of the solubility model. In this work, we quantified performances of four different solubility models by calculating the deviation of the CO<sub>2</sub> removal rates determined by both methods. Obtained data suggest that the simplest model (Loeppky) performs better than the more complex ones (May, Siggaard-Anderson, and Zierenberg). The models of May, Siggaard-Anderson, and Zierenberg show a significantly better performance for in vitro bovine blood data than for in vivo porcine blood data. Furthermore, the suitability of the Loeppky model parameters for bovine blood (in vitro) and porcine blood (in vivo) is evaluated.https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/8/3/33blood oxygenatorcarbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) removalcarbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) solubility modelmodel performancemodel suitabilityevaluation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Benjamin Lukitsch
Paul Ecker
Martin Elenkov
Christoph Janeczek
Christian Jordan
Claus G. Krenn
Roman Ullrich
Margit Gfoehler
Michael Harasek
spellingShingle Benjamin Lukitsch
Paul Ecker
Martin Elenkov
Christoph Janeczek
Christian Jordan
Claus G. Krenn
Roman Ullrich
Margit Gfoehler
Michael Harasek
Suitable CO<sub>2</sub> Solubility Models for Determination of the CO<sub>2</sub> Removal Performance of Oxygenators
Bioengineering
blood oxygenator
carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) removal
carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) solubility model
model performance
model suitability
evaluation
author_facet Benjamin Lukitsch
Paul Ecker
Martin Elenkov
Christoph Janeczek
Christian Jordan
Claus G. Krenn
Roman Ullrich
Margit Gfoehler
Michael Harasek
author_sort Benjamin Lukitsch
title Suitable CO<sub>2</sub> Solubility Models for Determination of the CO<sub>2</sub> Removal Performance of Oxygenators
title_short Suitable CO<sub>2</sub> Solubility Models for Determination of the CO<sub>2</sub> Removal Performance of Oxygenators
title_full Suitable CO<sub>2</sub> Solubility Models for Determination of the CO<sub>2</sub> Removal Performance of Oxygenators
title_fullStr Suitable CO<sub>2</sub> Solubility Models for Determination of the CO<sub>2</sub> Removal Performance of Oxygenators
title_full_unstemmed Suitable CO<sub>2</sub> Solubility Models for Determination of the CO<sub>2</sub> Removal Performance of Oxygenators
title_sort suitable co<sub>2</sub> solubility models for determination of the co<sub>2</sub> removal performance of oxygenators
publisher MDPI AG
series Bioengineering
issn 2306-5354
publishDate 2021-03-01
description CO<sub>2</sub> removal via membrane oxygenators during lung protective ventilation has become a reliable clinical technique. For further optimization of oxygenators, accurate prediction of the CO<sub>2</sub> removal rate is necessary. It can either be determined by measuring the CO<sub>2</sub> content in the exhaust gas of the oxygenator (sweep flow-based) or using blood gas analyzer data and a CO<sub>2</sub> solubility model (blood-based). In this study, we determined the CO<sub>2</sub> removal rate of a prototype oxygenator utilizing both methods in in vitro trials with bovine and in vivo trials with porcine blood. While the sweep flow-based method is reliably accurate, the blood-based method depends on the accuracy of the solubility model. In this work, we quantified performances of four different solubility models by calculating the deviation of the CO<sub>2</sub> removal rates determined by both methods. Obtained data suggest that the simplest model (Loeppky) performs better than the more complex ones (May, Siggaard-Anderson, and Zierenberg). The models of May, Siggaard-Anderson, and Zierenberg show a significantly better performance for in vitro bovine blood data than for in vivo porcine blood data. Furthermore, the suitability of the Loeppky model parameters for bovine blood (in vitro) and porcine blood (in vivo) is evaluated.
topic blood oxygenator
carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) removal
carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) solubility model
model performance
model suitability
evaluation
url https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/8/3/33
work_keys_str_mv AT benjaminlukitsch suitablecosub2subsolubilitymodelsfordeterminationofthecosub2subremovalperformanceofoxygenators
AT paulecker suitablecosub2subsolubilitymodelsfordeterminationofthecosub2subremovalperformanceofoxygenators
AT martinelenkov suitablecosub2subsolubilitymodelsfordeterminationofthecosub2subremovalperformanceofoxygenators
AT christophjaneczek suitablecosub2subsolubilitymodelsfordeterminationofthecosub2subremovalperformanceofoxygenators
AT christianjordan suitablecosub2subsolubilitymodelsfordeterminationofthecosub2subremovalperformanceofoxygenators
AT clausgkrenn suitablecosub2subsolubilitymodelsfordeterminationofthecosub2subremovalperformanceofoxygenators
AT romanullrich suitablecosub2subsolubilitymodelsfordeterminationofthecosub2subremovalperformanceofoxygenators
AT margitgfoehler suitablecosub2subsolubilitymodelsfordeterminationofthecosub2subremovalperformanceofoxygenators
AT michaelharasek suitablecosub2subsolubilitymodelsfordeterminationofthecosub2subremovalperformanceofoxygenators
_version_ 1724233751262658560