A Phantom Study on Target Localization Accuracy Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the 3-dimensional target localization accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) using an on-board imager (OBI). An anthropomorphic pelvis phantom was used to simulate a range of offsets in the three translational directions and rotations around each of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hui Yan Ph.D., Liwei Zhang, Fang-Fang Yin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2008-01-01
Series:Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.4137/CMO.S808
id doaj-56c466bb11ed40e98246d007adeab07e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-56c466bb11ed40e98246d007adeab07e2020-11-25T03:27:54ZengSAGE PublishingClinical Medicine Insights: Oncology1179-55492008-01-01210.4137/CMO.S808A Phantom Study on Target Localization Accuracy Using Cone-Beam Computed TomographyHui Yan Ph.D.0Liwei Zhang1Fang-Fang Yin2Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, U.S.A.Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, U.S.A.Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, U.S.A.The purpose of this study is to evaluate the 3-dimensional target localization accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) using an on-board imager (OBI). An anthropomorphic pelvis phantom was used to simulate a range of offsets in the three translational directions and rotations around each of the three axes. After a translational or rotational offset was applied, a CBCT scan of the phantom was followed by image registration to detect the offsets in six degrees. The detected offsets were compared to the offset actually applied to give the detection error of the phantom position. Afterwards, the phantom was positioned by automatically moving the couch based on the detected offsets. A second CBCT scan followed by image registration was performed to give the residual error of the phantom positioning. On the average the detection errors and their standard deviations along the lateral, longitudinal and vertical axis are 0.3 ± 0.1, 0.3 ± 0.1 and 0.4 ± 0.1 mm respectively with respect to translational shifts ranging from 0 to 10 mm. The corresponding residual errors after positioning are 0.3 ± 0.1, 0.5 ± 0.1 and 0.3 ± 0.1 mm. For simulated rotational shifts ranging from 0 to 5 degrees, the average detection error and their standard deviation around lateral, longitudinal, and vertical axes are 0.1 ± 0.0, 0.2 ± 0.0, and 0.2 ± 0.0 degrees respectively. The residual errors after positioning are 0.4 ± 0.1, 0.6 ± 0.1, and 0.3 ± 0.1 mm along the lateral, longitudinal and vertical directions. These results indicate that target localization based on CBCT is capable of achieving sub-millimeter accuracy.https://doi.org/10.4137/CMO.S808
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hui Yan Ph.D.
Liwei Zhang
Fang-Fang Yin
spellingShingle Hui Yan Ph.D.
Liwei Zhang
Fang-Fang Yin
A Phantom Study on Target Localization Accuracy Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology
author_facet Hui Yan Ph.D.
Liwei Zhang
Fang-Fang Yin
author_sort Hui Yan Ph.D.
title A Phantom Study on Target Localization Accuracy Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
title_short A Phantom Study on Target Localization Accuracy Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
title_full A Phantom Study on Target Localization Accuracy Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
title_fullStr A Phantom Study on Target Localization Accuracy Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
title_full_unstemmed A Phantom Study on Target Localization Accuracy Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
title_sort phantom study on target localization accuracy using cone-beam computed tomography
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology
issn 1179-5549
publishDate 2008-01-01
description The purpose of this study is to evaluate the 3-dimensional target localization accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) using an on-board imager (OBI). An anthropomorphic pelvis phantom was used to simulate a range of offsets in the three translational directions and rotations around each of the three axes. After a translational or rotational offset was applied, a CBCT scan of the phantom was followed by image registration to detect the offsets in six degrees. The detected offsets were compared to the offset actually applied to give the detection error of the phantom position. Afterwards, the phantom was positioned by automatically moving the couch based on the detected offsets. A second CBCT scan followed by image registration was performed to give the residual error of the phantom positioning. On the average the detection errors and their standard deviations along the lateral, longitudinal and vertical axis are 0.3 ± 0.1, 0.3 ± 0.1 and 0.4 ± 0.1 mm respectively with respect to translational shifts ranging from 0 to 10 mm. The corresponding residual errors after positioning are 0.3 ± 0.1, 0.5 ± 0.1 and 0.3 ± 0.1 mm. For simulated rotational shifts ranging from 0 to 5 degrees, the average detection error and their standard deviation around lateral, longitudinal, and vertical axes are 0.1 ± 0.0, 0.2 ± 0.0, and 0.2 ± 0.0 degrees respectively. The residual errors after positioning are 0.4 ± 0.1, 0.6 ± 0.1, and 0.3 ± 0.1 mm along the lateral, longitudinal and vertical directions. These results indicate that target localization based on CBCT is capable of achieving sub-millimeter accuracy.
url https://doi.org/10.4137/CMO.S808
work_keys_str_mv AT huiyanphd aphantomstudyontargetlocalizationaccuracyusingconebeamcomputedtomography
AT liweizhang aphantomstudyontargetlocalizationaccuracyusingconebeamcomputedtomography
AT fangfangyin aphantomstudyontargetlocalizationaccuracyusingconebeamcomputedtomography
AT huiyanphd phantomstudyontargetlocalizationaccuracyusingconebeamcomputedtomography
AT liweizhang phantomstudyontargetlocalizationaccuracyusingconebeamcomputedtomography
AT fangfangyin phantomstudyontargetlocalizationaccuracyusingconebeamcomputedtomography
_version_ 1724586533017616384