Explaining A Narrative in The Critical Philosophy of History

This paper explains the narrative in the study of history which has only been understood as a way of telling what should have happened, not what really happened. Narrative as a philosophical thought will be able to reveal not only the factual side but also the actual side. As a philosophical thought...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Arif Akhyat
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Gadjah Mada 2019-08-01
Series:Jurnal Filsafat
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/wisdom/article/view/48937
id doaj-56c9088c58bb4aae8df927c6c581b565
record_format Article
spelling doaj-56c9088c58bb4aae8df927c6c581b5652020-11-25T02:04:18ZengUniversitas Gadjah MadaJurnal Filsafat0853-18702528-68112019-08-0129216618210.22146/jf.4893724917Explaining A Narrative in The Critical Philosophy of HistoryArif Akhyat0Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Gadjah MadaThis paper explains the narrative in the study of history which has only been understood as a way of telling what should have happened, not what really happened. Narrative as a philosophical thought will be able to reveal not only the factual side but also the actual side. As a philosophical thought, the narrative should be able to provide a new understanding that narration is not just telling (history as a story), but also how can narration be used to explain the historical actuality? Through a new understanding of narrative, history actually as science becomes parallel to other sciences as philosophy. Historical narratives then present "stories" to "facts explained". Thus, history is present and humane because it is always actual. History as a narrative, thus not only makes history a discourse with a dissertation of evidence but also history as a way of abstracting objects in factual thinking.https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/wisdom/article/view/48937narrativehistoryactualityphilosophy of history
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Arif Akhyat
spellingShingle Arif Akhyat
Explaining A Narrative in The Critical Philosophy of History
Jurnal Filsafat
narrative
history
actuality
philosophy of history
author_facet Arif Akhyat
author_sort Arif Akhyat
title Explaining A Narrative in The Critical Philosophy of History
title_short Explaining A Narrative in The Critical Philosophy of History
title_full Explaining A Narrative in The Critical Philosophy of History
title_fullStr Explaining A Narrative in The Critical Philosophy of History
title_full_unstemmed Explaining A Narrative in The Critical Philosophy of History
title_sort explaining a narrative in the critical philosophy of history
publisher Universitas Gadjah Mada
series Jurnal Filsafat
issn 0853-1870
2528-6811
publishDate 2019-08-01
description This paper explains the narrative in the study of history which has only been understood as a way of telling what should have happened, not what really happened. Narrative as a philosophical thought will be able to reveal not only the factual side but also the actual side. As a philosophical thought, the narrative should be able to provide a new understanding that narration is not just telling (history as a story), but also how can narration be used to explain the historical actuality? Through a new understanding of narrative, history actually as science becomes parallel to other sciences as philosophy. Historical narratives then present "stories" to "facts explained". Thus, history is present and humane because it is always actual. History as a narrative, thus not only makes history a discourse with a dissertation of evidence but also history as a way of abstracting objects in factual thinking.
topic narrative
history
actuality
philosophy of history
url https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/wisdom/article/view/48937
work_keys_str_mv AT arifakhyat explaininganarrativeinthecriticalphilosophyofhistory
_version_ 1724943197010919424