THE PROTECTION OF CONTRADICTORY IN THE BRAZILIAN NEW CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE: THE PROHIBITION OF “SUPRISE DECISIONS”; CONDITION TO THE EXTENSION OF THE OBJECTIVE LIMITS OF “RES JUDICATA”; IDENTIFYING UNMOTIVATED DECISIONS
This article aims to analyze different kinds of judicial protection to the contradictory principle in the new Civil Procedure Code. As a procedural fundamental right, contradictory demands real application by judges and legislators. The new Civil Procedure Code ruled the theme properly, which can be...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
2016-06-01
|
Series: | Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/article/view/23113/19632 |
id |
doaj-56d850cb3c3b4d8f8a21bc0fa19e4cbc |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-56d850cb3c3b4d8f8a21bc0fa19e4cbc2021-08-24T19:52:40ZengUniversidade do Estado do Rio de JaneiroRevista Eletrônica de Direito Processual1982-76362016-06-01171164192https://doi.org/10.12957/redp.2016.23113THE PROTECTION OF CONTRADICTORY IN THE BRAZILIAN NEW CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE: THE PROHIBITION OF “SUPRISE DECISIONS”; CONDITION TO THE EXTENSION OF THE OBJECTIVE LIMITS OF “RES JUDICATA”; IDENTIFYING UNMOTIVATED DECISIONSPaulo Henrique dos Santos Lucon0Faculdade de Direito do Largo de São Francisco – USPThis article aims to analyze different kinds of judicial protection to the contradictory principle in the new Civil Procedure Code. As a procedural fundamental right, contradictory demands real application by judges and legislators. The new Civil Procedure Code ruled the theme properly, which can be identified by the prohibition of “suprise decisions”; the prevision of contradictory as a condition to the extension of the objective limits of “res judicata” to the so called “prejudicial questions” and the identification of unmotivated decisions.https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/article/view/23113/19632suprise decisionsobjective limits of “res judicata”motivationjudicial decisionscontradictorybrazilian new civil procedure codecivil procedure code of 2015prejudicial question |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Paulo Henrique dos Santos Lucon |
spellingShingle |
Paulo Henrique dos Santos Lucon THE PROTECTION OF CONTRADICTORY IN THE BRAZILIAN NEW CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE: THE PROHIBITION OF “SUPRISE DECISIONS”; CONDITION TO THE EXTENSION OF THE OBJECTIVE LIMITS OF “RES JUDICATA”; IDENTIFYING UNMOTIVATED DECISIONS Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual suprise decisions objective limits of “res judicata” motivation judicial decisions contradictory brazilian new civil procedure code civil procedure code of 2015 prejudicial question |
author_facet |
Paulo Henrique dos Santos Lucon |
author_sort |
Paulo Henrique dos Santos Lucon |
title |
THE PROTECTION OF CONTRADICTORY IN THE BRAZILIAN NEW CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE: THE PROHIBITION OF “SUPRISE DECISIONS”; CONDITION TO THE EXTENSION OF THE OBJECTIVE LIMITS OF “RES JUDICATA”; IDENTIFYING UNMOTIVATED DECISIONS |
title_short |
THE PROTECTION OF CONTRADICTORY IN THE BRAZILIAN NEW CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE: THE PROHIBITION OF “SUPRISE DECISIONS”; CONDITION TO THE EXTENSION OF THE OBJECTIVE LIMITS OF “RES JUDICATA”; IDENTIFYING UNMOTIVATED DECISIONS |
title_full |
THE PROTECTION OF CONTRADICTORY IN THE BRAZILIAN NEW CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE: THE PROHIBITION OF “SUPRISE DECISIONS”; CONDITION TO THE EXTENSION OF THE OBJECTIVE LIMITS OF “RES JUDICATA”; IDENTIFYING UNMOTIVATED DECISIONS |
title_fullStr |
THE PROTECTION OF CONTRADICTORY IN THE BRAZILIAN NEW CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE: THE PROHIBITION OF “SUPRISE DECISIONS”; CONDITION TO THE EXTENSION OF THE OBJECTIVE LIMITS OF “RES JUDICATA”; IDENTIFYING UNMOTIVATED DECISIONS |
title_full_unstemmed |
THE PROTECTION OF CONTRADICTORY IN THE BRAZILIAN NEW CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE: THE PROHIBITION OF “SUPRISE DECISIONS”; CONDITION TO THE EXTENSION OF THE OBJECTIVE LIMITS OF “RES JUDICATA”; IDENTIFYING UNMOTIVATED DECISIONS |
title_sort |
protection of contradictory in the brazilian new civil procedure code: the prohibition of “suprise decisions”; condition to the extension of the objective limits of “res judicata”; identifying unmotivated decisions |
publisher |
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro |
series |
Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual |
issn |
1982-7636 |
publishDate |
2016-06-01 |
description |
This article aims to analyze different kinds of judicial protection to the contradictory principle in the new Civil Procedure Code. As a procedural fundamental right, contradictory demands real application by judges and legislators. The new Civil Procedure Code ruled the theme properly, which can be identified by the prohibition of “suprise decisions”; the prevision of contradictory as a condition to the extension of the objective limits of “res judicata” to the so called “prejudicial questions” and the identification of unmotivated decisions. |
topic |
suprise decisions objective limits of “res judicata” motivation judicial decisions contradictory brazilian new civil procedure code civil procedure code of 2015 prejudicial question |
url |
https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/article/view/23113/19632 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT paulohenriquedossantoslucon theprotectionofcontradictoryinthebraziliannewcivilprocedurecodetheprohibitionofsuprisedecisionsconditiontotheextensionoftheobjectivelimitsofresjudicataidentifyingunmotivateddecisions AT paulohenriquedossantoslucon protectionofcontradictoryinthebraziliannewcivilprocedurecodetheprohibitionofsuprisedecisionsconditiontotheextensionoftheobjectivelimitsofresjudicataidentifyingunmotivateddecisions |
_version_ |
1721197180640821248 |