THE PROTECTION OF CONTRADICTORY IN THE BRAZILIAN NEW CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE: THE PROHIBITION OF “SUPRISE DECISIONS”; CONDITION TO THE EXTENSION OF THE OBJECTIVE LIMITS OF “RES JUDICATA”; IDENTIFYING UNMOTIVATED DECISIONS

This article aims to analyze different kinds of judicial protection to the contradictory principle in the new Civil Procedure Code. As a procedural fundamental right, contradictory demands real application by judges and legislators. The new Civil Procedure Code ruled the theme properly, which can be...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Paulo Henrique dos Santos Lucon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro 2016-06-01
Series:Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/article/view/23113/19632
id doaj-56d850cb3c3b4d8f8a21bc0fa19e4cbc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-56d850cb3c3b4d8f8a21bc0fa19e4cbc2021-08-24T19:52:40ZengUniversidade do Estado do Rio de JaneiroRevista Eletrônica de Direito Processual1982-76362016-06-01171164192https://doi.org/10.12957/redp.2016.23113THE PROTECTION OF CONTRADICTORY IN THE BRAZILIAN NEW CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE: THE PROHIBITION OF “SUPRISE DECISIONS”; CONDITION TO THE EXTENSION OF THE OBJECTIVE LIMITS OF “RES JUDICATA”; IDENTIFYING UNMOTIVATED DECISIONSPaulo Henrique dos Santos Lucon0Faculdade de Direito do Largo de São Francisco – USPThis article aims to analyze different kinds of judicial protection to the contradictory principle in the new Civil Procedure Code. As a procedural fundamental right, contradictory demands real application by judges and legislators. The new Civil Procedure Code ruled the theme properly, which can be identified by the prohibition of “suprise decisions”; the prevision of contradictory as a condition to the extension of the objective limits of “res judicata” to the so called “prejudicial questions” and the identification of unmotivated decisions.https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/article/view/23113/19632suprise decisionsobjective limits of “res judicata”motivationjudicial decisionscontradictorybrazilian new civil procedure codecivil procedure code of 2015prejudicial question
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paulo Henrique dos Santos Lucon
spellingShingle Paulo Henrique dos Santos Lucon
THE PROTECTION OF CONTRADICTORY IN THE BRAZILIAN NEW CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE: THE PROHIBITION OF “SUPRISE DECISIONS”; CONDITION TO THE EXTENSION OF THE OBJECTIVE LIMITS OF “RES JUDICATA”; IDENTIFYING UNMOTIVATED DECISIONS
Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual
suprise decisions
objective limits of “res judicata”
motivation
judicial decisions
contradictory
brazilian new civil procedure code
civil procedure code of 2015
prejudicial question
author_facet Paulo Henrique dos Santos Lucon
author_sort Paulo Henrique dos Santos Lucon
title THE PROTECTION OF CONTRADICTORY IN THE BRAZILIAN NEW CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE: THE PROHIBITION OF “SUPRISE DECISIONS”; CONDITION TO THE EXTENSION OF THE OBJECTIVE LIMITS OF “RES JUDICATA”; IDENTIFYING UNMOTIVATED DECISIONS
title_short THE PROTECTION OF CONTRADICTORY IN THE BRAZILIAN NEW CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE: THE PROHIBITION OF “SUPRISE DECISIONS”; CONDITION TO THE EXTENSION OF THE OBJECTIVE LIMITS OF “RES JUDICATA”; IDENTIFYING UNMOTIVATED DECISIONS
title_full THE PROTECTION OF CONTRADICTORY IN THE BRAZILIAN NEW CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE: THE PROHIBITION OF “SUPRISE DECISIONS”; CONDITION TO THE EXTENSION OF THE OBJECTIVE LIMITS OF “RES JUDICATA”; IDENTIFYING UNMOTIVATED DECISIONS
title_fullStr THE PROTECTION OF CONTRADICTORY IN THE BRAZILIAN NEW CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE: THE PROHIBITION OF “SUPRISE DECISIONS”; CONDITION TO THE EXTENSION OF THE OBJECTIVE LIMITS OF “RES JUDICATA”; IDENTIFYING UNMOTIVATED DECISIONS
title_full_unstemmed THE PROTECTION OF CONTRADICTORY IN THE BRAZILIAN NEW CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE: THE PROHIBITION OF “SUPRISE DECISIONS”; CONDITION TO THE EXTENSION OF THE OBJECTIVE LIMITS OF “RES JUDICATA”; IDENTIFYING UNMOTIVATED DECISIONS
title_sort protection of contradictory in the brazilian new civil procedure code: the prohibition of “suprise decisions”; condition to the extension of the objective limits of “res judicata”; identifying unmotivated decisions
publisher Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
series Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual
issn 1982-7636
publishDate 2016-06-01
description This article aims to analyze different kinds of judicial protection to the contradictory principle in the new Civil Procedure Code. As a procedural fundamental right, contradictory demands real application by judges and legislators. The new Civil Procedure Code ruled the theme properly, which can be identified by the prohibition of “suprise decisions”; the prevision of contradictory as a condition to the extension of the objective limits of “res judicata” to the so called “prejudicial questions” and the identification of unmotivated decisions.
topic suprise decisions
objective limits of “res judicata”
motivation
judicial decisions
contradictory
brazilian new civil procedure code
civil procedure code of 2015
prejudicial question
url https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/article/view/23113/19632
work_keys_str_mv AT paulohenriquedossantoslucon theprotectionofcontradictoryinthebraziliannewcivilprocedurecodetheprohibitionofsuprisedecisionsconditiontotheextensionoftheobjectivelimitsofresjudicataidentifyingunmotivateddecisions
AT paulohenriquedossantoslucon protectionofcontradictoryinthebraziliannewcivilprocedurecodetheprohibitionofsuprisedecisionsconditiontotheextensionoftheobjectivelimitsofresjudicataidentifyingunmotivateddecisions
_version_ 1721197180640821248