THE PROTECTION OF CONTRADICTORY IN THE BRAZILIAN NEW CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE: THE PROHIBITION OF “SUPRISE DECISIONS”; CONDITION TO THE EXTENSION OF THE OBJECTIVE LIMITS OF “RES JUDICATA”; IDENTIFYING UNMOTIVATED DECISIONS
This article aims to analyze different kinds of judicial protection to the contradictory principle in the new Civil Procedure Code. As a procedural fundamental right, contradictory demands real application by judges and legislators. The new Civil Procedure Code ruled the theme properly, which can be...
Main Author: | Paulo Henrique dos Santos Lucon |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
2016-06-01
|
Series: | Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/article/view/23113/19632 |
Similar Items
-
THE AMPLITUDE OF IMPUGNATION IN ACTION OF TERMINATION: PARTIAL DECISION, RES JUDICATA RULING, CHAPTERS OF THE DECISION AND PROGRESSIVE RES JUDICATA
by: Vinicius Silva Lemos
Published: (2019-04-01) -
THE STABILITY OF ANTICIPATION OF TUTELAGE AND THE RES JUDICATA: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PROCESSUAL INSTITUTES
by: Ricardo Schneider Rodrigues, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01) -
STABILITY, IMMUTABILITY OF THE ANTICIPATED EFFECTS AND THE EFFECT OF RES JUDICATA: AN IMPROVED VERSION
by: Roberto P. Campos Gouveia Filho, et al.
Published: (2016-12-01) -
Theoretical and jurisprudential considerations on res judicata authority
by: Daniela Cristina Creţ, et al.
Published: (2016-10-01) -
The res judicata rule in jurisdictional decisions of the international Court of justice
by: Kreća Milenko
Published: (2014-01-01)