The Route of Infection Influences the Contribution of Key Immunity Genes to Antibacterial Defense in Anopheles gambiae

Insect systemic immune responses to bacterial infections have been mainly studied using microinjections, whereby the microbe is directly injected into the hemocoel. While this methodology has been instrumental in defining immune signaling pathways and enzymatic cascades in the hemolymph, it remains...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amira San Dekmak, Xiaowei Yang, Heinrich Zu Dohna, Nicolas Buchon, Mike A. Osta
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Karger Publishers 2020-11-01
Series:Journal of Innate Immunity
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/511401
id doaj-575f99230a6e4d4c83db10ec07701836
record_format Article
spelling doaj-575f99230a6e4d4c83db10ec077018362020-12-17T16:08:16ZengKarger PublishersJournal of Innate Immunity1662-811X1662-81282020-11-0112010.1159/000511401511401The Route of Infection Influences the Contribution of Key Immunity Genes to Antibacterial Defense in Anopheles gambiaeAmira San DekmakXiaowei YangHeinrich Zu DohnaNicolas BuchonMike A. OstaInsect systemic immune responses to bacterial infections have been mainly studied using microinjections, whereby the microbe is directly injected into the hemocoel. While this methodology has been instrumental in defining immune signaling pathways and enzymatic cascades in the hemolymph, it remains unclear whether and to what extent the contribution of systemic immune defenses to host microbial resistance varies if bacteria invade the hemolymph after crossing the midgut epithelium subsequent to an oral infection. Here, we address this question using the pathogenic Serratia marcescens (Sm) DB11 strain to establish systemic infections of the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae, either by septic Sm injections or by midgut crossing after feeding on Sm. Using functional genetic studies by RNAi, we report that the two humoral immune factors, thioester-containing protein 1 and C-type lectin 4, which play key roles in defense against Gram-negative bacterial infections, are essential for defense against systemic Sm infections established through injection, but they become dispensable when Sm infects the hemolymph following oral infection. Similar results were observed for the mosquito Rel2 pathway. Surprisingly, blocking phagocytosis by cytochalasin D treatment did not affect mosquito susceptibility to Sm infections established through either route. Transcriptomic analysis of mosquito midguts and abdomens by RNA-seq revealed that the transcriptional response in these tissues is more pronounced in response to feeding on Sm. Functional classification of differentially expressed transcripts identified metabolic genes as the most represented class in response to both routes of infection, while immune genes were poorly regulated in both routes. We also report that Sm oral infections are associated with significant downregulation of several immune genes belonging to different families, specifically the clip-domain serine protease family. In sum, our findings reveal that the route of infection not only alters the contribution of key immunity genes to host antimicrobial defense but is also associated with different transcriptional responses in midguts and abdomens, possibly reflecting different adaptive strategies of the host.https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/511401anopheles gambiaemosquito innate immunitycomplement-like proteinc-type lectinserratia marcescensoral infections
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Amira San Dekmak
Xiaowei Yang
Heinrich Zu Dohna
Nicolas Buchon
Mike A. Osta
spellingShingle Amira San Dekmak
Xiaowei Yang
Heinrich Zu Dohna
Nicolas Buchon
Mike A. Osta
The Route of Infection Influences the Contribution of Key Immunity Genes to Antibacterial Defense in Anopheles gambiae
Journal of Innate Immunity
anopheles gambiae
mosquito innate immunity
complement-like protein
c-type lectin
serratia marcescens
oral infections
author_facet Amira San Dekmak
Xiaowei Yang
Heinrich Zu Dohna
Nicolas Buchon
Mike A. Osta
author_sort Amira San Dekmak
title The Route of Infection Influences the Contribution of Key Immunity Genes to Antibacterial Defense in Anopheles gambiae
title_short The Route of Infection Influences the Contribution of Key Immunity Genes to Antibacterial Defense in Anopheles gambiae
title_full The Route of Infection Influences the Contribution of Key Immunity Genes to Antibacterial Defense in Anopheles gambiae
title_fullStr The Route of Infection Influences the Contribution of Key Immunity Genes to Antibacterial Defense in Anopheles gambiae
title_full_unstemmed The Route of Infection Influences the Contribution of Key Immunity Genes to Antibacterial Defense in Anopheles gambiae
title_sort route of infection influences the contribution of key immunity genes to antibacterial defense in anopheles gambiae
publisher Karger Publishers
series Journal of Innate Immunity
issn 1662-811X
1662-8128
publishDate 2020-11-01
description Insect systemic immune responses to bacterial infections have been mainly studied using microinjections, whereby the microbe is directly injected into the hemocoel. While this methodology has been instrumental in defining immune signaling pathways and enzymatic cascades in the hemolymph, it remains unclear whether and to what extent the contribution of systemic immune defenses to host microbial resistance varies if bacteria invade the hemolymph after crossing the midgut epithelium subsequent to an oral infection. Here, we address this question using the pathogenic Serratia marcescens (Sm) DB11 strain to establish systemic infections of the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae, either by septic Sm injections or by midgut crossing after feeding on Sm. Using functional genetic studies by RNAi, we report that the two humoral immune factors, thioester-containing protein 1 and C-type lectin 4, which play key roles in defense against Gram-negative bacterial infections, are essential for defense against systemic Sm infections established through injection, but they become dispensable when Sm infects the hemolymph following oral infection. Similar results were observed for the mosquito Rel2 pathway. Surprisingly, blocking phagocytosis by cytochalasin D treatment did not affect mosquito susceptibility to Sm infections established through either route. Transcriptomic analysis of mosquito midguts and abdomens by RNA-seq revealed that the transcriptional response in these tissues is more pronounced in response to feeding on Sm. Functional classification of differentially expressed transcripts identified metabolic genes as the most represented class in response to both routes of infection, while immune genes were poorly regulated in both routes. We also report that Sm oral infections are associated with significant downregulation of several immune genes belonging to different families, specifically the clip-domain serine protease family. In sum, our findings reveal that the route of infection not only alters the contribution of key immunity genes to host antimicrobial defense but is also associated with different transcriptional responses in midguts and abdomens, possibly reflecting different adaptive strategies of the host.
topic anopheles gambiae
mosquito innate immunity
complement-like protein
c-type lectin
serratia marcescens
oral infections
url https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/511401
work_keys_str_mv AT amirasandekmak therouteofinfectioninfluencesthecontributionofkeyimmunitygenestoantibacterialdefenseinanophelesgambiae
AT xiaoweiyang therouteofinfectioninfluencesthecontributionofkeyimmunitygenestoantibacterialdefenseinanophelesgambiae
AT heinrichzudohna therouteofinfectioninfluencesthecontributionofkeyimmunitygenestoantibacterialdefenseinanophelesgambiae
AT nicolasbuchon therouteofinfectioninfluencesthecontributionofkeyimmunitygenestoantibacterialdefenseinanophelesgambiae
AT mikeaosta therouteofinfectioninfluencesthecontributionofkeyimmunitygenestoantibacterialdefenseinanophelesgambiae
AT amirasandekmak routeofinfectioninfluencesthecontributionofkeyimmunitygenestoantibacterialdefenseinanophelesgambiae
AT xiaoweiyang routeofinfectioninfluencesthecontributionofkeyimmunitygenestoantibacterialdefenseinanophelesgambiae
AT heinrichzudohna routeofinfectioninfluencesthecontributionofkeyimmunitygenestoantibacterialdefenseinanophelesgambiae
AT nicolasbuchon routeofinfectioninfluencesthecontributionofkeyimmunitygenestoantibacterialdefenseinanophelesgambiae
AT mikeaosta routeofinfectioninfluencesthecontributionofkeyimmunitygenestoantibacterialdefenseinanophelesgambiae
_version_ 1724379219467698176