Research capacity building in and on teacher education: developing practice and learning

Research is widely acknowledged as a key element of professional learning for intending and serving teachers, as well as for their teacher educators. And yet, despite this centrality, research in teacher education is often subjected to critique and contestation. Internationally, the quality of such...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jean Murray, Eline Vanassche
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP 2019-11-01
Series:Nordisk Tidsskrift for Utdanning og Praksis
Subjects:
Online Access:https://utdanningogpraksis.no/index.php/up/article/view/1975/3776
id doaj-57684a0ac7d246b9b9f7bc8268962dad
record_format Article
spelling doaj-57684a0ac7d246b9b9f7bc8268962dad2020-11-25T01:42:34ZengCappelen Damm Akademisk NOASPNordisk Tidsskrift for Utdanning og Praksis2535-76972019-11-0113211412910.23865/up.v13.1975up.v13.1975Research capacity building in and on teacher education: developing practice and learningJean MurrayEline VanasscheResearch is widely acknowledged as a key element of professional learning for intending and serving teachers, as well as for their teacher educators. And yet, despite this centrality, research in teacher education is often subjected to critique and contestation. Internationally, the quality of such research has been questioned, and there are on-going issues about when, how and why teacher educators and teachers (can) engage in research. Initiatives to build research capacity in teacher education thus remain of crucial importance. Here we focus on this issue, aiming to analyse how to strengthen the field of teacher education locally and internationally. We first set out a conceptual framework for considering capacity building, and then analyse three international examples of practice in teacher education research: the Norwegian Doctoral School (NAFOL); the use of self-study research in Belgium (Flanders); and the Teacher Education Research Network (TERN), a social practices initiative in England. The contextualised analysis of these local capacity-building initiatives exemplifies what factors influence their enactments and outcomes and, in so doing, also inform a more ‘glocal’ understanding of how to build research capacity in and on teacher education. From this follows our overall question: what can be learned from these cases about how to build research capacity in and on teacher education?https://utdanningogpraksis.no/index.php/up/article/view/1975/3776teacher educationresearch capacity buildingteacher educators
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jean Murray
Eline Vanassche
spellingShingle Jean Murray
Eline Vanassche
Research capacity building in and on teacher education: developing practice and learning
Nordisk Tidsskrift for Utdanning og Praksis
teacher education
research capacity building
teacher educators
author_facet Jean Murray
Eline Vanassche
author_sort Jean Murray
title Research capacity building in and on teacher education: developing practice and learning
title_short Research capacity building in and on teacher education: developing practice and learning
title_full Research capacity building in and on teacher education: developing practice and learning
title_fullStr Research capacity building in and on teacher education: developing practice and learning
title_full_unstemmed Research capacity building in and on teacher education: developing practice and learning
title_sort research capacity building in and on teacher education: developing practice and learning
publisher Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP
series Nordisk Tidsskrift for Utdanning og Praksis
issn 2535-7697
publishDate 2019-11-01
description Research is widely acknowledged as a key element of professional learning for intending and serving teachers, as well as for their teacher educators. And yet, despite this centrality, research in teacher education is often subjected to critique and contestation. Internationally, the quality of such research has been questioned, and there are on-going issues about when, how and why teacher educators and teachers (can) engage in research. Initiatives to build research capacity in teacher education thus remain of crucial importance. Here we focus on this issue, aiming to analyse how to strengthen the field of teacher education locally and internationally. We first set out a conceptual framework for considering capacity building, and then analyse three international examples of practice in teacher education research: the Norwegian Doctoral School (NAFOL); the use of self-study research in Belgium (Flanders); and the Teacher Education Research Network (TERN), a social practices initiative in England. The contextualised analysis of these local capacity-building initiatives exemplifies what factors influence their enactments and outcomes and, in so doing, also inform a more ‘glocal’ understanding of how to build research capacity in and on teacher education. From this follows our overall question: what can be learned from these cases about how to build research capacity in and on teacher education?
topic teacher education
research capacity building
teacher educators
url https://utdanningogpraksis.no/index.php/up/article/view/1975/3776
work_keys_str_mv AT jeanmurray researchcapacitybuildinginandonteachereducationdevelopingpracticeandlearning
AT elinevanassche researchcapacitybuildinginandonteachereducationdevelopingpracticeandlearning
_version_ 1725035390376607744