Left ventricular remodeling and hypertrophy in patients with aortic stenosis: insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is the gold standard non-invasive method for determining left ventricular (LV) mass and volume but has not been used previously to characterise the LV remodeling response in aortic stenosis. We...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dweck Marc R, Joshi Sanjiv, Murigu Timothy, Gulati Ankur, Alpendurada Francisco, Jabbour Andrew, Maceira Alicia, Roussin Isabelle, Northridge David B, Kilner Philip J, Cook Stuart A, Boon Nicholas A, Pepper John, Mohiaddin Raad H, Newby David E, Pennell Dudley J, Prasad Sanjay K
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-07-01
Series:Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Subjects:
MRI
Online Access:http://jcmr-online.com/content/14/1/50
id doaj-57d8e4aec8c04a458d12a484067dd3f2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-57d8e4aec8c04a458d12a484067dd3f22020-11-25T00:52:16ZengBMCJournal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance1097-66471532-429X2012-07-011415010.1186/1532-429X-14-50Left ventricular remodeling and hypertrophy in patients with aortic stenosis: insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonanceDweck Marc RJoshi SanjivMurigu TimothyGulati AnkurAlpendurada FranciscoJabbour AndrewMaceira AliciaRoussin IsabelleNorthridge David BKilner Philip JCook Stuart ABoon Nicholas APepper JohnMohiaddin Raad HNewby David EPennell Dudley JPrasad Sanjay K<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is the gold standard non-invasive method for determining left ventricular (LV) mass and volume but has not been used previously to characterise the LV remodeling response in aortic stenosis. We sought to investigate the degree and patterns of hypertrophy in aortic stenosis using CMR.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Patients with moderate or severe aortic stenosis, normal coronary arteries and no other significant valve lesions or cardiomyopathy were scanned by CMR with valve severity assessed by planimetry and velocity mapping. The extent and patterns of hypertrophy were investigated using measurements of the LV mass index, indexed LV volumes and the LV mass/volume ratio. Asymmetric forms of remodeling and hypertrophy were defined by a regional wall thickening <b>≥</b>13 mm and >1.5-fold the thickness of the opposing myocardial segment.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Ninety-one patients (61±21 years; 57 male) with aortic stenosis (aortic valve area 0.93±0.32cm2) were recruited. The severity of aortic stenosis was unrelated to the degree (r<sup>2</sup>=0.012, P=0.43) and pattern (P=0.22) of hypertrophy. By univariate analysis, only male sex demonstrated an association with LV mass index (P=0.02). Six patterns of LV adaption were observed: normal ventricular geometry (n=11), concentric remodeling (n=11), asymmetric remodeling (n=11), concentric hypertrophy (n=34), asymmetric hypertrophy (n=14) and LV decompensation (n=10). Asymmetric patterns displayed considerable overlap in appearances (wall thickness 17±2mm) with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>We have demonstrated that in patients with moderate and severe aortic stenosis, the pattern of LV adaption and degree of hypertrophy do not closely correlate with the severity of valve narrowing and that asymmetric patterns of wall thickening are common.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p>ClinicalTrials.gov Reference Number: NCT00930735</p> http://jcmr-online.com/content/14/1/50Aortic valve diseaseMRICardiac remodeling
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dweck Marc R
Joshi Sanjiv
Murigu Timothy
Gulati Ankur
Alpendurada Francisco
Jabbour Andrew
Maceira Alicia
Roussin Isabelle
Northridge David B
Kilner Philip J
Cook Stuart A
Boon Nicholas A
Pepper John
Mohiaddin Raad H
Newby David E
Pennell Dudley J
Prasad Sanjay K
spellingShingle Dweck Marc R
Joshi Sanjiv
Murigu Timothy
Gulati Ankur
Alpendurada Francisco
Jabbour Andrew
Maceira Alicia
Roussin Isabelle
Northridge David B
Kilner Philip J
Cook Stuart A
Boon Nicholas A
Pepper John
Mohiaddin Raad H
Newby David E
Pennell Dudley J
Prasad Sanjay K
Left ventricular remodeling and hypertrophy in patients with aortic stenosis: insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Aortic valve disease
MRI
Cardiac remodeling
author_facet Dweck Marc R
Joshi Sanjiv
Murigu Timothy
Gulati Ankur
Alpendurada Francisco
Jabbour Andrew
Maceira Alicia
Roussin Isabelle
Northridge David B
Kilner Philip J
Cook Stuart A
Boon Nicholas A
Pepper John
Mohiaddin Raad H
Newby David E
Pennell Dudley J
Prasad Sanjay K
author_sort Dweck Marc R
title Left ventricular remodeling and hypertrophy in patients with aortic stenosis: insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance
title_short Left ventricular remodeling and hypertrophy in patients with aortic stenosis: insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance
title_full Left ventricular remodeling and hypertrophy in patients with aortic stenosis: insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance
title_fullStr Left ventricular remodeling and hypertrophy in patients with aortic stenosis: insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance
title_full_unstemmed Left ventricular remodeling and hypertrophy in patients with aortic stenosis: insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance
title_sort left ventricular remodeling and hypertrophy in patients with aortic stenosis: insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance
publisher BMC
series Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
issn 1097-6647
1532-429X
publishDate 2012-07-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is the gold standard non-invasive method for determining left ventricular (LV) mass and volume but has not been used previously to characterise the LV remodeling response in aortic stenosis. We sought to investigate the degree and patterns of hypertrophy in aortic stenosis using CMR.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Patients with moderate or severe aortic stenosis, normal coronary arteries and no other significant valve lesions or cardiomyopathy were scanned by CMR with valve severity assessed by planimetry and velocity mapping. The extent and patterns of hypertrophy were investigated using measurements of the LV mass index, indexed LV volumes and the LV mass/volume ratio. Asymmetric forms of remodeling and hypertrophy were defined by a regional wall thickening <b>≥</b>13 mm and >1.5-fold the thickness of the opposing myocardial segment.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Ninety-one patients (61±21 years; 57 male) with aortic stenosis (aortic valve area 0.93±0.32cm2) were recruited. The severity of aortic stenosis was unrelated to the degree (r<sup>2</sup>=0.012, P=0.43) and pattern (P=0.22) of hypertrophy. By univariate analysis, only male sex demonstrated an association with LV mass index (P=0.02). Six patterns of LV adaption were observed: normal ventricular geometry (n=11), concentric remodeling (n=11), asymmetric remodeling (n=11), concentric hypertrophy (n=34), asymmetric hypertrophy (n=14) and LV decompensation (n=10). Asymmetric patterns displayed considerable overlap in appearances (wall thickness 17±2mm) with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>We have demonstrated that in patients with moderate and severe aortic stenosis, the pattern of LV adaption and degree of hypertrophy do not closely correlate with the severity of valve narrowing and that asymmetric patterns of wall thickening are common.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p>ClinicalTrials.gov Reference Number: NCT00930735</p>
topic Aortic valve disease
MRI
Cardiac remodeling
url http://jcmr-online.com/content/14/1/50
work_keys_str_mv AT dweckmarcr leftventricularremodelingandhypertrophyinpatientswithaorticstenosisinsightsfromcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT joshisanjiv leftventricularremodelingandhypertrophyinpatientswithaorticstenosisinsightsfromcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT murigutimothy leftventricularremodelingandhypertrophyinpatientswithaorticstenosisinsightsfromcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT gulatiankur leftventricularremodelingandhypertrophyinpatientswithaorticstenosisinsightsfromcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT alpenduradafrancisco leftventricularremodelingandhypertrophyinpatientswithaorticstenosisinsightsfromcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT jabbourandrew leftventricularremodelingandhypertrophyinpatientswithaorticstenosisinsightsfromcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT maceiraalicia leftventricularremodelingandhypertrophyinpatientswithaorticstenosisinsightsfromcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT roussinisabelle leftventricularremodelingandhypertrophyinpatientswithaorticstenosisinsightsfromcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT northridgedavidb leftventricularremodelingandhypertrophyinpatientswithaorticstenosisinsightsfromcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT kilnerphilipj leftventricularremodelingandhypertrophyinpatientswithaorticstenosisinsightsfromcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT cookstuarta leftventricularremodelingandhypertrophyinpatientswithaorticstenosisinsightsfromcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT boonnicholasa leftventricularremodelingandhypertrophyinpatientswithaorticstenosisinsightsfromcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT pepperjohn leftventricularremodelingandhypertrophyinpatientswithaorticstenosisinsightsfromcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT mohiaddinraadh leftventricularremodelingandhypertrophyinpatientswithaorticstenosisinsightsfromcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT newbydavide leftventricularremodelingandhypertrophyinpatientswithaorticstenosisinsightsfromcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT pennelldudleyj leftventricularremodelingandhypertrophyinpatientswithaorticstenosisinsightsfromcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT prasadsanjayk leftventricularremodelingandhypertrophyinpatientswithaorticstenosisinsightsfromcardiovascularmagneticresonance
_version_ 1725243152258826240