Ultrasound-Guided Pudendal Nerve Block Combined with Propofol Deep Sedation versus Spinal Anesthesia for Hemorrhoidectomy: A Prospective Randomized Study

Background and Objectives. Several anesthesia techniques were applied to hemorrhoidectomy, but postoperative pain and urinary retention were still two unsolved problems. The aim of this prospective randomized study was to evaluate the effect of ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block (PNB) combined w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jian He, Lei Zhang, Dong L. Li, Wan Y. He, Qing M. Xiong, Xue Q. Zheng, Mei J. Liao, Han B. Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2021-01-01
Series:Pain Research and Management
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6644262
id doaj-57e93132e2b94831ad2362b4d9ba5f8d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-57e93132e2b94831ad2362b4d9ba5f8d2021-03-08T02:00:21ZengHindawi LimitedPain Research and Management1918-15232021-01-01202110.1155/2021/6644262Ultrasound-Guided Pudendal Nerve Block Combined with Propofol Deep Sedation versus Spinal Anesthesia for Hemorrhoidectomy: A Prospective Randomized StudyJian He0Lei Zhang1Dong L. Li2Wan Y. He3Qing M. Xiong4Xue Q. Zheng5Mei J. Liao6Han B. Wang7Department of AnesthesiologyDepartment of AnesthesiologyDepartment of AnesthesiologyDepartment of AnesthesiologyDepartment of AnesthesiologyDepartment of AnesthesiologyDepartment of AnesthesiologyDepartment of AnesthesiologyBackground and Objectives. Several anesthesia techniques were applied to hemorrhoidectomy, but postoperative pain and urinary retention were still two unsolved problems. The aim of this prospective randomized study was to evaluate the effect of ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block (PNB) combined with deep sedation compared to spinal anesthesia for hemorrhoidectomy. Methods. One hundred and twenty patients undergoing Milligan–Morgan hemorrhoidectomy were randomized to receive PNB combined with deep sedation using propofol (Group PNB, n = 60) or spinal anesthesia (Group SA, n = 60). Pain intensity was assessed using the visual analogue scale (0: no pain to 10: worst possible pain). The primary outcome was pain scores recorded at rest at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h and on walking at 12, 24, 36, and 48 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were analgesic consumption, side effects, and patient satisfaction after surgery. Results. Ultrasound-guided bilateral PNB combined with deep sedation using propofol could successfully be applied to Milligan–Morgan hemorrhoidectomy. Postoperative pain intensity was significantly lower in Group PNB compared to Group SA at rest at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h (p<0.001) and during mobilization at 12, 24, 36, and 48 h (p<0.001) postoperatively. Sufentanil consumption in Group PNB was significantly lower than that in Group SA, during 0–24 h (p<0.001) and during 24–48 h (p<0.001) postoperatively. Urinary retention was significantly lower in Group PNB compared to Group SA (6.9% vs 20%, p=0.034). The patients in Group PNB had higher satisfaction compared to Group SA (p<0.001). Conclusions. Ultrasound-guided PNB combined with propofol sedation is an effective anesthesia technique for Milligan–Morgan hemorrhoidectomy.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6644262
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jian He
Lei Zhang
Dong L. Li
Wan Y. He
Qing M. Xiong
Xue Q. Zheng
Mei J. Liao
Han B. Wang
spellingShingle Jian He
Lei Zhang
Dong L. Li
Wan Y. He
Qing M. Xiong
Xue Q. Zheng
Mei J. Liao
Han B. Wang
Ultrasound-Guided Pudendal Nerve Block Combined with Propofol Deep Sedation versus Spinal Anesthesia for Hemorrhoidectomy: A Prospective Randomized Study
Pain Research and Management
author_facet Jian He
Lei Zhang
Dong L. Li
Wan Y. He
Qing M. Xiong
Xue Q. Zheng
Mei J. Liao
Han B. Wang
author_sort Jian He
title Ultrasound-Guided Pudendal Nerve Block Combined with Propofol Deep Sedation versus Spinal Anesthesia for Hemorrhoidectomy: A Prospective Randomized Study
title_short Ultrasound-Guided Pudendal Nerve Block Combined with Propofol Deep Sedation versus Spinal Anesthesia for Hemorrhoidectomy: A Prospective Randomized Study
title_full Ultrasound-Guided Pudendal Nerve Block Combined with Propofol Deep Sedation versus Spinal Anesthesia for Hemorrhoidectomy: A Prospective Randomized Study
title_fullStr Ultrasound-Guided Pudendal Nerve Block Combined with Propofol Deep Sedation versus Spinal Anesthesia for Hemorrhoidectomy: A Prospective Randomized Study
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound-Guided Pudendal Nerve Block Combined with Propofol Deep Sedation versus Spinal Anesthesia for Hemorrhoidectomy: A Prospective Randomized Study
title_sort ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block combined with propofol deep sedation versus spinal anesthesia for hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective randomized study
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Pain Research and Management
issn 1918-1523
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Background and Objectives. Several anesthesia techniques were applied to hemorrhoidectomy, but postoperative pain and urinary retention were still two unsolved problems. The aim of this prospective randomized study was to evaluate the effect of ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block (PNB) combined with deep sedation compared to spinal anesthesia for hemorrhoidectomy. Methods. One hundred and twenty patients undergoing Milligan–Morgan hemorrhoidectomy were randomized to receive PNB combined with deep sedation using propofol (Group PNB, n = 60) or spinal anesthesia (Group SA, n = 60). Pain intensity was assessed using the visual analogue scale (0: no pain to 10: worst possible pain). The primary outcome was pain scores recorded at rest at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h and on walking at 12, 24, 36, and 48 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were analgesic consumption, side effects, and patient satisfaction after surgery. Results. Ultrasound-guided bilateral PNB combined with deep sedation using propofol could successfully be applied to Milligan–Morgan hemorrhoidectomy. Postoperative pain intensity was significantly lower in Group PNB compared to Group SA at rest at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h (p<0.001) and during mobilization at 12, 24, 36, and 48 h (p<0.001) postoperatively. Sufentanil consumption in Group PNB was significantly lower than that in Group SA, during 0–24 h (p<0.001) and during 24–48 h (p<0.001) postoperatively. Urinary retention was significantly lower in Group PNB compared to Group SA (6.9% vs 20%, p=0.034). The patients in Group PNB had higher satisfaction compared to Group SA (p<0.001). Conclusions. Ultrasound-guided PNB combined with propofol sedation is an effective anesthesia technique for Milligan–Morgan hemorrhoidectomy.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6644262
work_keys_str_mv AT jianhe ultrasoundguidedpudendalnerveblockcombinedwithpropofoldeepsedationversusspinalanesthesiaforhemorrhoidectomyaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT leizhang ultrasoundguidedpudendalnerveblockcombinedwithpropofoldeepsedationversusspinalanesthesiaforhemorrhoidectomyaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT donglli ultrasoundguidedpudendalnerveblockcombinedwithpropofoldeepsedationversusspinalanesthesiaforhemorrhoidectomyaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT wanyhe ultrasoundguidedpudendalnerveblockcombinedwithpropofoldeepsedationversusspinalanesthesiaforhemorrhoidectomyaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT qingmxiong ultrasoundguidedpudendalnerveblockcombinedwithpropofoldeepsedationversusspinalanesthesiaforhemorrhoidectomyaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT xueqzheng ultrasoundguidedpudendalnerveblockcombinedwithpropofoldeepsedationversusspinalanesthesiaforhemorrhoidectomyaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT meijliao ultrasoundguidedpudendalnerveblockcombinedwithpropofoldeepsedationversusspinalanesthesiaforhemorrhoidectomyaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT hanbwang ultrasoundguidedpudendalnerveblockcombinedwithpropofoldeepsedationversusspinalanesthesiaforhemorrhoidectomyaprospectiverandomizedstudy
_version_ 1714797363620478976