Disclosure of Third-Party Funding in Commercial Arbitration

Third-party funding used to be an unknown phenomenon to the majority of arbitration scholars and practitioners but, over the past decade, the phenomenon has entered the arbitration scene and become subject to significant attention. Today, arbitral proceedings may involve sophisticated funding arran...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Caroline Overgaard, Johan Tufte-Kristensen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Aalborg Universitetsforlag 2020-08-01
Series:Nordic Journal of Commercial Law
Online Access:https://somaesthetics.aau.dk/index.php/NJCL/article/view/6099
id doaj-57eb6ffcd897421999fcc44caed2f643
record_format Article
spelling doaj-57eb6ffcd897421999fcc44caed2f6432021-02-27T14:19:45ZengAalborg UniversitetsforlagNordic Journal of Commercial Law1459-96862020-08-01210.5278/ojs.njcl.vi2.6099Disclosure of Third-Party Funding in Commercial ArbitrationCaroline OvergaardJohan Tufte-Kristensen Third-party funding used to be an unknown phenomenon to the majority of arbitration scholars and practitioners but, over the past decade, the phenomenon has entered the arbitration scene and become subject to significant attention. Today, arbitral proceedings may involve sophisticated funding arrangements. Such arrangements may promote access to arbitration and entail other advantages, but when they remain unknown to the arbitrators and the funded party’s opponents, they may give rise to a series of practical issues concerning, inter alia, costs and conflicts of interest. When a party has raised funding from a third-party funder, the arbitrators and opponents need to know about it. A series of practitioners and academics have contributed to the general field of thirdparty funding in arbitration. They have examined the prevalence of the phenomenon and identified the issues associated with it. However, only a few have provided practical and operational solutions to these issues. The article explains how to solve the issues by way of disclosure. It examines the consequences of compelling a funded party to disclose its funding arrangements, and it examines how to adopt and construct a duty of disclosure in the most feasible manner. The article thereby contributes to the development of legal and institutional tools to tackle the issues associated with third-party funding in arbitration. https://somaesthetics.aau.dk/index.php/NJCL/article/view/6099
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Caroline Overgaard
Johan Tufte-Kristensen
spellingShingle Caroline Overgaard
Johan Tufte-Kristensen
Disclosure of Third-Party Funding in Commercial Arbitration
Nordic Journal of Commercial Law
author_facet Caroline Overgaard
Johan Tufte-Kristensen
author_sort Caroline Overgaard
title Disclosure of Third-Party Funding in Commercial Arbitration
title_short Disclosure of Third-Party Funding in Commercial Arbitration
title_full Disclosure of Third-Party Funding in Commercial Arbitration
title_fullStr Disclosure of Third-Party Funding in Commercial Arbitration
title_full_unstemmed Disclosure of Third-Party Funding in Commercial Arbitration
title_sort disclosure of third-party funding in commercial arbitration
publisher Aalborg Universitetsforlag
series Nordic Journal of Commercial Law
issn 1459-9686
publishDate 2020-08-01
description Third-party funding used to be an unknown phenomenon to the majority of arbitration scholars and practitioners but, over the past decade, the phenomenon has entered the arbitration scene and become subject to significant attention. Today, arbitral proceedings may involve sophisticated funding arrangements. Such arrangements may promote access to arbitration and entail other advantages, but when they remain unknown to the arbitrators and the funded party’s opponents, they may give rise to a series of practical issues concerning, inter alia, costs and conflicts of interest. When a party has raised funding from a third-party funder, the arbitrators and opponents need to know about it. A series of practitioners and academics have contributed to the general field of thirdparty funding in arbitration. They have examined the prevalence of the phenomenon and identified the issues associated with it. However, only a few have provided practical and operational solutions to these issues. The article explains how to solve the issues by way of disclosure. It examines the consequences of compelling a funded party to disclose its funding arrangements, and it examines how to adopt and construct a duty of disclosure in the most feasible manner. The article thereby contributes to the development of legal and institutional tools to tackle the issues associated with third-party funding in arbitration.
url https://somaesthetics.aau.dk/index.php/NJCL/article/view/6099
work_keys_str_mv AT carolineovergaard disclosureofthirdpartyfundingincommercialarbitration
AT johantuftekristensen disclosureofthirdpartyfundingincommercialarbitration
_version_ 1724247924863401984