Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy Improves Weight Loss Compared to Nonbanded Sleeve: Midterm Results from a Prospective Randomized Study

Background. Weight regain after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is nowadays a growing concern. Sleeve dilatation and loss of food restriction is considered the main mechanism. The placement of a silicon ring around the gastric tube seems to give benefits in the short term. We report the result...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paolo Gentileschi, Emanuela Bianciardi, Leandro Siragusa, Valeria Tognoni, Domenico Benavoli, Stefano D’Ugo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of Obesity
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9792518
id doaj-57eb76da3b14485f8b7aa5ae2e7f8bb3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-57eb76da3b14485f8b7aa5ae2e7f8bb32020-11-25T02:24:27ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Obesity2090-07082090-07162020-01-01202010.1155/2020/97925189792518Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy Improves Weight Loss Compared to Nonbanded Sleeve: Midterm Results from a Prospective Randomized StudyPaolo Gentileschi0Emanuela Bianciardi1Leandro Siragusa2Valeria Tognoni3Domenico Benavoli4Stefano D’Ugo5Department of Surgery, Obesity Unit, Tor Vergata University Hospital, Viale Oxford 81–00133, Rome, ItalyDepartment of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University Hospital, Viale Oxford 81–00133, Rome, ItalyDepartment of Surgery, Tor Vergata University Hospital, Viale Oxford 81–00133, Rome, ItalyDepartment of Surgery, Tor Vergata University Hospital, Viale Oxford 81–00133, Rome, ItalyDepartment of Surgery, Tor Vergata University Hospital, Viale Oxford 81–00133, Rome, ItalyDepartment of General Surgery, “Vito Fazzi” Hospital, Piazza Muratore 1–73100, Lecce, ItalyBackground. Weight regain after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is nowadays a growing concern. Sleeve dilatation and loss of food restriction is considered the main mechanism. The placement of a silicon ring around the gastric tube seems to give benefits in the short term. We report the results of a randomized study comparing LSG and laparoscopic banded sleeve gastrectomy (LBSG) over a 4-year follow-up. Objectives. To evaluate the efficacy of banded sleeve gastrectomy compared to standard sleeve in the midterm. Methods. Between 01/2014 and 01/2015, we randomly assigned 50 patients to receive one of the two procedures. Patients’ management was exactly the same, apart from the band placement. We analyzed differences in weight loss, operative time, complication rate, and mortality, with a median follow-up of 4 years. Results. Twenty five patients were assigned to receive LSG (Group A) and 25 LBSG (Group B). The mean preoperative BMI (body mass index) was 47.3 ± 6.58 kg/m2 and 45.95 ± 5.85 kg/m2, respectively. There was no significant difference in the operative time. No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred. At 12-month follow-up, the mean BMI was 29.72 ± 4.40 kg/m2 in Group A and 27.42 ± 4.47 kg/m2 in Group B (p=0.186). After a median follow-up of 4 years, the mean BMI in Group B was significantly lower than Group A (24.10 ± 4.52 kg/m2 vs 28.80 ± 4.62 kg/m2; p=0.00199). Conclusions. LBSG is a safe procedure, with no impact on postoperative complications. The banded sleeve showed a significant greater weight loss in the midterm follow-up. Considering the issue of weight regain observed after LSG, the placement of a perigastric ring during the first procedure may be a strategy to improve the results. This trial is registered with NCT04228185.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9792518
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paolo Gentileschi
Emanuela Bianciardi
Leandro Siragusa
Valeria Tognoni
Domenico Benavoli
Stefano D’Ugo
spellingShingle Paolo Gentileschi
Emanuela Bianciardi
Leandro Siragusa
Valeria Tognoni
Domenico Benavoli
Stefano D’Ugo
Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy Improves Weight Loss Compared to Nonbanded Sleeve: Midterm Results from a Prospective Randomized Study
Journal of Obesity
author_facet Paolo Gentileschi
Emanuela Bianciardi
Leandro Siragusa
Valeria Tognoni
Domenico Benavoli
Stefano D’Ugo
author_sort Paolo Gentileschi
title Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy Improves Weight Loss Compared to Nonbanded Sleeve: Midterm Results from a Prospective Randomized Study
title_short Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy Improves Weight Loss Compared to Nonbanded Sleeve: Midterm Results from a Prospective Randomized Study
title_full Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy Improves Weight Loss Compared to Nonbanded Sleeve: Midterm Results from a Prospective Randomized Study
title_fullStr Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy Improves Weight Loss Compared to Nonbanded Sleeve: Midterm Results from a Prospective Randomized Study
title_full_unstemmed Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy Improves Weight Loss Compared to Nonbanded Sleeve: Midterm Results from a Prospective Randomized Study
title_sort banded sleeve gastrectomy improves weight loss compared to nonbanded sleeve: midterm results from a prospective randomized study
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Journal of Obesity
issn 2090-0708
2090-0716
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Background. Weight regain after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is nowadays a growing concern. Sleeve dilatation and loss of food restriction is considered the main mechanism. The placement of a silicon ring around the gastric tube seems to give benefits in the short term. We report the results of a randomized study comparing LSG and laparoscopic banded sleeve gastrectomy (LBSG) over a 4-year follow-up. Objectives. To evaluate the efficacy of banded sleeve gastrectomy compared to standard sleeve in the midterm. Methods. Between 01/2014 and 01/2015, we randomly assigned 50 patients to receive one of the two procedures. Patients’ management was exactly the same, apart from the band placement. We analyzed differences in weight loss, operative time, complication rate, and mortality, with a median follow-up of 4 years. Results. Twenty five patients were assigned to receive LSG (Group A) and 25 LBSG (Group B). The mean preoperative BMI (body mass index) was 47.3 ± 6.58 kg/m2 and 45.95 ± 5.85 kg/m2, respectively. There was no significant difference in the operative time. No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred. At 12-month follow-up, the mean BMI was 29.72 ± 4.40 kg/m2 in Group A and 27.42 ± 4.47 kg/m2 in Group B (p=0.186). After a median follow-up of 4 years, the mean BMI in Group B was significantly lower than Group A (24.10 ± 4.52 kg/m2 vs 28.80 ± 4.62 kg/m2; p=0.00199). Conclusions. LBSG is a safe procedure, with no impact on postoperative complications. The banded sleeve showed a significant greater weight loss in the midterm follow-up. Considering the issue of weight regain observed after LSG, the placement of a perigastric ring during the first procedure may be a strategy to improve the results. This trial is registered with NCT04228185.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9792518
work_keys_str_mv AT paologentileschi bandedsleevegastrectomyimprovesweightlosscomparedtononbandedsleevemidtermresultsfromaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT emanuelabianciardi bandedsleevegastrectomyimprovesweightlosscomparedtononbandedsleevemidtermresultsfromaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT leandrosiragusa bandedsleevegastrectomyimprovesweightlosscomparedtononbandedsleevemidtermresultsfromaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT valeriatognoni bandedsleevegastrectomyimprovesweightlosscomparedtononbandedsleevemidtermresultsfromaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT domenicobenavoli bandedsleevegastrectomyimprovesweightlosscomparedtononbandedsleevemidtermresultsfromaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT stefanodugo bandedsleevegastrectomyimprovesweightlosscomparedtononbandedsleevemidtermresultsfromaprospectiverandomizedstudy
_version_ 1715494594531033088