Evaluation of natural vulnerability to contamination of Serra Geral aquifer system In Paraná – Brazil

Groundwater is an important source for human supply, however, it is more and more exposed to contamination due to urbanization, industrial and agricultural expansion. This paper presents a study in regional scale about the natural vulnerability of groundwater in the Serra Geral Aquifer System in Par...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vinícius Menezes Borges, Gustavo Barbosa Athayde, Pedro Antônio Roehe Reginato
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Associação Brasileira de Águas Subterrâneas 2017-10-01
Series:Revista Águas Subterrâneas
Subjects:
Online Access:https://aguassubterraneas.abas.org/asubterraneas/article/view/28857
id doaj-57f23f7b60d44d5c97491714654fd483
record_format Article
spelling doaj-57f23f7b60d44d5c97491714654fd4832020-11-25T01:21:16ZengAssociação Brasileira de Águas SubterrâneasRevista Águas Subterrâneas0101-70042179-97842017-10-0131432733710.14295/ras.v31i4.2885717189Evaluation of natural vulnerability to contamination of Serra Geral aquifer system In Paraná – BrazilVinícius Menezes Borges0Gustavo Barbosa Athayde1Pedro Antônio Roehe Reginato2Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulGroundwater is an important source for human supply, however, it is more and more exposed to contamination due to urbanization, industrial and agricultural expansion. This paper presents a study in regional scale about the natural vulnerability of groundwater in the Serra Geral Aquifer System in Paraná. DRASTIC and GOD methods with adaptations for fractured aquifers were used and compared through normalization of vulnerability values. The map obtained by DRASTIC method presented the following levels of vulnerability: low (5,01%), moderate (83,13%) and high (11,85%). GOD method presented low (66,21%), moderate (0,67%), high (14,32%) and extreme (18,81) vulnerability. DRASTIC method presented better spatial detail and more intermediate values, while GOD showed abrupt due to the simple parameterization. Although the DRASTIC method presented better results, the choice for a method must be conditioned to the data, human and financial availability.https://aguassubterraneas.abas.org/asubterraneas/article/view/28857Vulnerabilidade. DRASTIC. GOD. Sistema Aquífero Serra Geral.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vinícius Menezes Borges
Gustavo Barbosa Athayde
Pedro Antônio Roehe Reginato
spellingShingle Vinícius Menezes Borges
Gustavo Barbosa Athayde
Pedro Antônio Roehe Reginato
Evaluation of natural vulnerability to contamination of Serra Geral aquifer system In Paraná – Brazil
Revista Águas Subterrâneas
Vulnerabilidade. DRASTIC. GOD. Sistema Aquífero Serra Geral.
author_facet Vinícius Menezes Borges
Gustavo Barbosa Athayde
Pedro Antônio Roehe Reginato
author_sort Vinícius Menezes Borges
title Evaluation of natural vulnerability to contamination of Serra Geral aquifer system In Paraná – Brazil
title_short Evaluation of natural vulnerability to contamination of Serra Geral aquifer system In Paraná – Brazil
title_full Evaluation of natural vulnerability to contamination of Serra Geral aquifer system In Paraná – Brazil
title_fullStr Evaluation of natural vulnerability to contamination of Serra Geral aquifer system In Paraná – Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of natural vulnerability to contamination of Serra Geral aquifer system In Paraná – Brazil
title_sort evaluation of natural vulnerability to contamination of serra geral aquifer system in paraná – brazil
publisher Associação Brasileira de Águas Subterrâneas
series Revista Águas Subterrâneas
issn 0101-7004
2179-9784
publishDate 2017-10-01
description Groundwater is an important source for human supply, however, it is more and more exposed to contamination due to urbanization, industrial and agricultural expansion. This paper presents a study in regional scale about the natural vulnerability of groundwater in the Serra Geral Aquifer System in Paraná. DRASTIC and GOD methods with adaptations for fractured aquifers were used and compared through normalization of vulnerability values. The map obtained by DRASTIC method presented the following levels of vulnerability: low (5,01%), moderate (83,13%) and high (11,85%). GOD method presented low (66,21%), moderate (0,67%), high (14,32%) and extreme (18,81) vulnerability. DRASTIC method presented better spatial detail and more intermediate values, while GOD showed abrupt due to the simple parameterization. Although the DRASTIC method presented better results, the choice for a method must be conditioned to the data, human and financial availability.
topic Vulnerabilidade. DRASTIC. GOD. Sistema Aquífero Serra Geral.
url https://aguassubterraneas.abas.org/asubterraneas/article/view/28857
work_keys_str_mv AT viniciusmenezesborges evaluationofnaturalvulnerabilitytocontaminationofserrageralaquifersysteminparanabrazil
AT gustavobarbosaathayde evaluationofnaturalvulnerabilitytocontaminationofserrageralaquifersysteminparanabrazil
AT pedroantonioroehereginato evaluationofnaturalvulnerabilitytocontaminationofserrageralaquifersysteminparanabrazil
_version_ 1725131284624179200