Grafalon® vs. Thymoglobulin® as an induction agent in renal transplantation – A retrospective study

Introduction: Antihuman thymocyte immunoglobulin, used as an induction agent in renal transplantation, is of two types – thymoglobulin and grafalon (formerly ATG-Fresenius). In this study, we compared outcomes with these two agents. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective study of patients t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pranaw Kumar Jha, Abhyudaysingh Rana, Ajay Kher, Shyam Bihari Bansal, Sidharth Sethi, Ashish Nandwani, Manish Jain, Dinesh Bansal, Dinesh Kumar Yadav, Ashwini Gadde, Amit Kumar Mahapatra, Puneet Sodhi, Vijay Kher
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Nephrology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.indianjnephrol.org/article.asp?issn=0971-4065;year=2021;volume=31;issue=4;spage=336;epage=340;aulast=Jha
id doaj-581e8e5577644040b9ab307128dcb7b7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-581e8e5577644040b9ab307128dcb7b72021-10-02T17:41:43ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Nephrology0971-40651998-36622021-01-0131433634010.4103/ijn.IJN_205_20Grafalon® vs. Thymoglobulin® as an induction agent in renal transplantation – A retrospective studyPranaw Kumar JhaAbhyudaysingh RanaAjay KherShyam Bihari BansalSidharth SethiAshish NandwaniManish JainDinesh BansalDinesh Kumar YadavAshwini GaddeAmit Kumar MahapatraPuneet SodhiVijay KherIntroduction: Antihuman thymocyte immunoglobulin, used as an induction agent in renal transplantation, is of two types – thymoglobulin and grafalon (formerly ATG-Fresenius). In this study, we compared outcomes with these two agents. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective study of patients transplanted from January 2017 to October 2019, who received either grafalon or thymoglobulin induction. Grafalon or thymoglobulin was given at 6 and 3 mg/kg, respectively, followed by standard triple immunosuppression of tacrolimus, MMF, and prednisolone. Results: Median follow up was 22 (3–36) months. Thymoglobulin was given to 255 patients, whereas 78 patients received grafalon. Baseline demographics were similar between the two groups although significantly more patients in the grafalon group received ABO incompatible transplant (15% vs. 4.3%; P = 0.002). Patient survival was similar between the two groups (99% in grafalon vs. 98.8% in thymoglobulin; P = 1.0). Death censored graft survival was also similar (99% in grafalon vs. 100% in thymoglobulin; P = 0.23). Biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) was significantly higher in the grafalon group (12.8% vs. 5.1%, P = 0.04). The significance persisted after multivariable regression analysis (P = 0.02). Other outcomes such as infection rate and estimated glomerular filtration rate on last follow up were comparable between the two groups. Conclusions: Grafalon (6 mg/kg dose) when used as an induction agent was associated with significantly higher rate of BPARs as compared to thymoglobulin (3 mg/kg dose) although with comparable short-term patient and death censored graft survival, graft function, and infection rates.http://www.indianjnephrol.org/article.asp?issn=0971-4065;year=2021;volume=31;issue=4;spage=336;epage=340;aulast=Jhaantilymphocyte serumindiakidney transplantationrabbitthymoglobulin
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pranaw Kumar Jha
Abhyudaysingh Rana
Ajay Kher
Shyam Bihari Bansal
Sidharth Sethi
Ashish Nandwani
Manish Jain
Dinesh Bansal
Dinesh Kumar Yadav
Ashwini Gadde
Amit Kumar Mahapatra
Puneet Sodhi
Vijay Kher
spellingShingle Pranaw Kumar Jha
Abhyudaysingh Rana
Ajay Kher
Shyam Bihari Bansal
Sidharth Sethi
Ashish Nandwani
Manish Jain
Dinesh Bansal
Dinesh Kumar Yadav
Ashwini Gadde
Amit Kumar Mahapatra
Puneet Sodhi
Vijay Kher
Grafalon® vs. Thymoglobulin® as an induction agent in renal transplantation – A retrospective study
Indian Journal of Nephrology
antilymphocyte serum
india
kidney transplantation
rabbit
thymoglobulin
author_facet Pranaw Kumar Jha
Abhyudaysingh Rana
Ajay Kher
Shyam Bihari Bansal
Sidharth Sethi
Ashish Nandwani
Manish Jain
Dinesh Bansal
Dinesh Kumar Yadav
Ashwini Gadde
Amit Kumar Mahapatra
Puneet Sodhi
Vijay Kher
author_sort Pranaw Kumar Jha
title Grafalon® vs. Thymoglobulin® as an induction agent in renal transplantation – A retrospective study
title_short Grafalon® vs. Thymoglobulin® as an induction agent in renal transplantation – A retrospective study
title_full Grafalon® vs. Thymoglobulin® as an induction agent in renal transplantation – A retrospective study
title_fullStr Grafalon® vs. Thymoglobulin® as an induction agent in renal transplantation – A retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Grafalon® vs. Thymoglobulin® as an induction agent in renal transplantation – A retrospective study
title_sort grafalon® vs. thymoglobulin® as an induction agent in renal transplantation – a retrospective study
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Nephrology
issn 0971-4065
1998-3662
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Introduction: Antihuman thymocyte immunoglobulin, used as an induction agent in renal transplantation, is of two types – thymoglobulin and grafalon (formerly ATG-Fresenius). In this study, we compared outcomes with these two agents. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective study of patients transplanted from January 2017 to October 2019, who received either grafalon or thymoglobulin induction. Grafalon or thymoglobulin was given at 6 and 3 mg/kg, respectively, followed by standard triple immunosuppression of tacrolimus, MMF, and prednisolone. Results: Median follow up was 22 (3–36) months. Thymoglobulin was given to 255 patients, whereas 78 patients received grafalon. Baseline demographics were similar between the two groups although significantly more patients in the grafalon group received ABO incompatible transplant (15% vs. 4.3%; P = 0.002). Patient survival was similar between the two groups (99% in grafalon vs. 98.8% in thymoglobulin; P = 1.0). Death censored graft survival was also similar (99% in grafalon vs. 100% in thymoglobulin; P = 0.23). Biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) was significantly higher in the grafalon group (12.8% vs. 5.1%, P = 0.04). The significance persisted after multivariable regression analysis (P = 0.02). Other outcomes such as infection rate and estimated glomerular filtration rate on last follow up were comparable between the two groups. Conclusions: Grafalon (6 mg/kg dose) when used as an induction agent was associated with significantly higher rate of BPARs as compared to thymoglobulin (3 mg/kg dose) although with comparable short-term patient and death censored graft survival, graft function, and infection rates.
topic antilymphocyte serum
india
kidney transplantation
rabbit
thymoglobulin
url http://www.indianjnephrol.org/article.asp?issn=0971-4065;year=2021;volume=31;issue=4;spage=336;epage=340;aulast=Jha
work_keys_str_mv AT pranawkumarjha grafalonvsthymoglobulinasaninductionagentinrenaltransplantationaretrospectivestudy
AT abhyudaysinghrana grafalonvsthymoglobulinasaninductionagentinrenaltransplantationaretrospectivestudy
AT ajaykher grafalonvsthymoglobulinasaninductionagentinrenaltransplantationaretrospectivestudy
AT shyambiharibansal grafalonvsthymoglobulinasaninductionagentinrenaltransplantationaretrospectivestudy
AT sidharthsethi grafalonvsthymoglobulinasaninductionagentinrenaltransplantationaretrospectivestudy
AT ashishnandwani grafalonvsthymoglobulinasaninductionagentinrenaltransplantationaretrospectivestudy
AT manishjain grafalonvsthymoglobulinasaninductionagentinrenaltransplantationaretrospectivestudy
AT dineshbansal grafalonvsthymoglobulinasaninductionagentinrenaltransplantationaretrospectivestudy
AT dineshkumaryadav grafalonvsthymoglobulinasaninductionagentinrenaltransplantationaretrospectivestudy
AT ashwinigadde grafalonvsthymoglobulinasaninductionagentinrenaltransplantationaretrospectivestudy
AT amitkumarmahapatra grafalonvsthymoglobulinasaninductionagentinrenaltransplantationaretrospectivestudy
AT puneetsodhi grafalonvsthymoglobulinasaninductionagentinrenaltransplantationaretrospectivestudy
AT vijaykher grafalonvsthymoglobulinasaninductionagentinrenaltransplantationaretrospectivestudy
_version_ 1716850696275361792