Asymmetric Frontal Response across the Gulf of Mexico Front in Winter 2016

The interaction of cold-vertically stratified (CVS) Mississippi River water with warm-horizontally stratified (WHS) Gulf of Mexico water resulted in a front that affected the oceanic surface layer. Our cross-frontal observations demonstrated two vertical layers. The cross-frontal deep layer (9–30 m)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammad Barzegar, Darek Bogucki, Brian K. Haus, Tamay Ozgokmen, Mingming Shao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-04-01
Series:Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/9/4/402
id doaj-583979e48b9241cdb3de3e64d788c4c4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-583979e48b9241cdb3de3e64d788c4c42021-04-09T23:06:01ZengMDPI AGJournal of Marine Science and Engineering2077-13122021-04-01940240210.3390/jmse9040402Asymmetric Frontal Response across the Gulf of Mexico Front in Winter 2016Mohammad Barzegar0Darek Bogucki1Brian K. Haus2Tamay Ozgokmen3Mingming Shao4Department of Physical and Environmental Sciences, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, TX 78412, USADepartment of Physical and Environmental Sciences, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, TX 78412, USARosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33149, USARosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33149, USARosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33149, USAThe interaction of cold-vertically stratified (CVS) Mississippi River water with warm-horizontally stratified (WHS) Gulf of Mexico water resulted in a front that affected the oceanic surface layer. Our cross-frontal observations demonstrated two vertical layers. The cross-frontal deep layer (9–30 m) averaged a temperature dissipation rate (TD) varied by a factor of 1000 and was larger on the CVS side. The near-surface layer (0–9 m) averaged TD did not vary significantly across the front. The deep layer frontal asymmetry coincided with depths where the Thorpe scale was large. The situation was similar for the layer averaged turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate (TKED). Within both layers, the averaged-TKED values were 10–30 times larger on the CVS side. The surface turbulent heat flux was up to 4 times larger on the WHS side. The observed asymmetric response of the turbulence across the front could play a significant role in the ocean-atmosphere climate system.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/9/4/402frontturbulenceheat fluxgulf of mexico
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mohammad Barzegar
Darek Bogucki
Brian K. Haus
Tamay Ozgokmen
Mingming Shao
spellingShingle Mohammad Barzegar
Darek Bogucki
Brian K. Haus
Tamay Ozgokmen
Mingming Shao
Asymmetric Frontal Response across the Gulf of Mexico Front in Winter 2016
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
front
turbulence
heat flux
gulf of mexico
author_facet Mohammad Barzegar
Darek Bogucki
Brian K. Haus
Tamay Ozgokmen
Mingming Shao
author_sort Mohammad Barzegar
title Asymmetric Frontal Response across the Gulf of Mexico Front in Winter 2016
title_short Asymmetric Frontal Response across the Gulf of Mexico Front in Winter 2016
title_full Asymmetric Frontal Response across the Gulf of Mexico Front in Winter 2016
title_fullStr Asymmetric Frontal Response across the Gulf of Mexico Front in Winter 2016
title_full_unstemmed Asymmetric Frontal Response across the Gulf of Mexico Front in Winter 2016
title_sort asymmetric frontal response across the gulf of mexico front in winter 2016
publisher MDPI AG
series Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
issn 2077-1312
publishDate 2021-04-01
description The interaction of cold-vertically stratified (CVS) Mississippi River water with warm-horizontally stratified (WHS) Gulf of Mexico water resulted in a front that affected the oceanic surface layer. Our cross-frontal observations demonstrated two vertical layers. The cross-frontal deep layer (9–30 m) averaged a temperature dissipation rate (TD) varied by a factor of 1000 and was larger on the CVS side. The near-surface layer (0–9 m) averaged TD did not vary significantly across the front. The deep layer frontal asymmetry coincided with depths where the Thorpe scale was large. The situation was similar for the layer averaged turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate (TKED). Within both layers, the averaged-TKED values were 10–30 times larger on the CVS side. The surface turbulent heat flux was up to 4 times larger on the WHS side. The observed asymmetric response of the turbulence across the front could play a significant role in the ocean-atmosphere climate system.
topic front
turbulence
heat flux
gulf of mexico
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/9/4/402
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadbarzegar asymmetricfrontalresponseacrossthegulfofmexicofrontinwinter2016
AT darekbogucki asymmetricfrontalresponseacrossthegulfofmexicofrontinwinter2016
AT briankhaus asymmetricfrontalresponseacrossthegulfofmexicofrontinwinter2016
AT tamayozgokmen asymmetricfrontalresponseacrossthegulfofmexicofrontinwinter2016
AT mingmingshao asymmetricfrontalresponseacrossthegulfofmexicofrontinwinter2016
_version_ 1721532056584847360