Who are Tweeting Research Articles and Why?

The purpose of this paper is to understand the profiles of users and their motivations in sharing research articles on Twitter. The goal is to contribute to the understanding of Twitter as a new altmetric measure for assessing impact of research articles. In this paper, we extended the previous stud...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Htoo, Tint Hla Hla, Na, Jin-Cheon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information 2017-09-01
Series:Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:http://society.kisti.re.kr/sv/SV_svpsbs03V.do?method=download&cn1=JAKO201727038079770
id doaj-58480d3125c24f2d8e4637a5d87fe697
record_format Article
spelling doaj-58480d3125c24f2d8e4637a5d87fe6972020-11-25T01:39:02ZengKorea Institute of Science and Technology InformationJournal of Information Science Theory and Practice2287-90992287-45772017-09-0153486010.1633/JISTaP.2017.5.3.422879099Who are Tweeting Research Articles and Why?Htoo, Tint Hla Hla0Na, Jin-Cheon1Nanyang Technological UniversityNanyang Technological UniversityThe purpose of this paper is to understand the profiles of users and their motivations in sharing research articles on Twitter. The goal is to contribute to the understanding of Twitter as a new altmetric measure for assessing impact of research articles. In this paper, we extended the previous study of tweet motivations by finding out the profiles of twitter users. In particular, we examined six characteristics of users: gender, geographic distribution, academic, non-academic, individual, and organization. Out of several, we would like to highlight here three key findings. First, a great majority of users (86%) were from North America and Europe indicating the possibility that, if in general, tweets for research articles are mainly in English, Twitter as an alternative metric has a Western bias. Second, several previous altmetrics studies suggested that tweets, and altmetrics in general, do not indicate scholarly impact due to their low correlation with citation counts. This study provides further details in this aspect by revealing that most tweets (77%) were by individual users, 67% of whom were nonacademic. Therefore, tweets mostly reflect impact of research articles on the general public, rather than on academia. Finally, analysis from profiles and motivations showed that the majority of tweets (from 42% to 57%) in all user types highlighted the summary or findings of the article indicating that tweets are a new way of communicating research findings.http://society.kisti.re.kr/sv/SV_svpsbs03V.do?method=download&cn1=JAKO201727038079770TwitterAltmetricsUser ProfilingMotivationPsychology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Htoo, Tint Hla Hla
Na, Jin-Cheon
spellingShingle Htoo, Tint Hla Hla
Na, Jin-Cheon
Who are Tweeting Research Articles and Why?
Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice
Twitter
Altmetrics
User Profiling
Motivation
Psychology
author_facet Htoo, Tint Hla Hla
Na, Jin-Cheon
author_sort Htoo, Tint Hla Hla
title Who are Tweeting Research Articles and Why?
title_short Who are Tweeting Research Articles and Why?
title_full Who are Tweeting Research Articles and Why?
title_fullStr Who are Tweeting Research Articles and Why?
title_full_unstemmed Who are Tweeting Research Articles and Why?
title_sort who are tweeting research articles and why?
publisher Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information
series Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice
issn 2287-9099
2287-4577
publishDate 2017-09-01
description The purpose of this paper is to understand the profiles of users and their motivations in sharing research articles on Twitter. The goal is to contribute to the understanding of Twitter as a new altmetric measure for assessing impact of research articles. In this paper, we extended the previous study of tweet motivations by finding out the profiles of twitter users. In particular, we examined six characteristics of users: gender, geographic distribution, academic, non-academic, individual, and organization. Out of several, we would like to highlight here three key findings. First, a great majority of users (86%) were from North America and Europe indicating the possibility that, if in general, tweets for research articles are mainly in English, Twitter as an alternative metric has a Western bias. Second, several previous altmetrics studies suggested that tweets, and altmetrics in general, do not indicate scholarly impact due to their low correlation with citation counts. This study provides further details in this aspect by revealing that most tweets (77%) were by individual users, 67% of whom were nonacademic. Therefore, tweets mostly reflect impact of research articles on the general public, rather than on academia. Finally, analysis from profiles and motivations showed that the majority of tweets (from 42% to 57%) in all user types highlighted the summary or findings of the article indicating that tweets are a new way of communicating research findings.
topic Twitter
Altmetrics
User Profiling
Motivation
Psychology
url http://society.kisti.re.kr/sv/SV_svpsbs03V.do?method=download&cn1=JAKO201727038079770
work_keys_str_mv AT htootinthlahla whoaretweetingresearcharticlesandwhy
AT najincheon whoaretweetingresearcharticlesandwhy
_version_ 1725050675694403584