Innovator Filgrastim versus Generic Filgrastim in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Mobilization

Methods This is a retrospective study. G-CSF was administered in the dose of 10 μg/kg subcutaneous as a single dose for 4 days. On day 5, peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) apheresis was performed using Haemonetics MCS plus or COBE Spectra apheresis machine through a double-lumen central venous cathe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sadik Husian, Preethi Jeyaraman, S. K. Gupta, Reeta Rai, Sangeeta Pathak, Nitin Dayal, Rahul Naithani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2021-09-01
Series:South Asian Journal of Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0041-1729446
id doaj-585687e5121542988ddd5976fc623142
record_format Article
spelling doaj-585687e5121542988ddd5976fc6231422021-09-04T22:31:01ZengThieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.South Asian Journal of Cancer2278-330X2278-43062021-09-0110.1055/s-0041-1729446Innovator Filgrastim versus Generic Filgrastim in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation MobilizationSadik Husian0Preethi Jeyaraman1S. K. Gupta2Reeta Rai3Sangeeta Pathak4Nitin Dayal5Rahul Naithani6Department of Pharmacology, Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University, New Delhi, IndiaDivision of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplant, Saket, New Delhi, IndiaDepartment of Pharmacology, Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University, New Delhi, IndiaDivision of Transfusion Medicine, Department of Lab Medicine Transfusion Medicine, Max Super Specialty Hospital, Saket, New Delhi, IndiaDivision of Transfusion Medicine, Department of Lab Medicine Transfusion Medicine, Max Super Specialty Hospital, Saket, New Delhi, IndiaDepartment of Lab Medicine, Max Super Specialty Hospital, Saket, New Delhi, IndiaDivision of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplant, Saket, New Delhi, IndiaMethods This is a retrospective study. G-CSF was administered in the dose of 10 μg/kg subcutaneous as a single dose for 4 days. On day 5, peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) apheresis was performed using Haemonetics MCS plus or COBE Spectra apheresis machine through a double-lumen central venous catheter. Primary outcome parameters were the total number of CD34+ HSCs/kg of recipient weight mobilized in peripheral blood and the number of days required for neutrophil and platelets engraftment, respectively. Objective We compared the effectiveness and safety of innovator filgrastim versus generic filgrastim in patients who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Results A total of 91 stem cell mobilizations was analyzed. There were 58 normal healthy donors for allogeneic HSCT and 33 patients for autologous HSCT. There was no statistically significant difference among groups in terms of total collected CD34+ cells value (p = 0.609). The mean time to neutrophil engraftment was 13.7 days in the innovator group and 13.2 days in the Grafeel group (p = 0.518). The mean time to platelet engraftment was 16.2 days in the innovator group and 14.8 days in the generic group (p = 0.435). The patient who received generic filgrastim had more febrile episodes during the course of transplantation (p = 0.020). Conclusion Generic filgrastim was found to be comparable to original filgrastim for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in normal healthy donors for allogeneic HSCT and patients for autologous HSCT.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0041-1729446bone marrow transplantcd34granulocyte colony-stimulating factormobilization
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sadik Husian
Preethi Jeyaraman
S. K. Gupta
Reeta Rai
Sangeeta Pathak
Nitin Dayal
Rahul Naithani
spellingShingle Sadik Husian
Preethi Jeyaraman
S. K. Gupta
Reeta Rai
Sangeeta Pathak
Nitin Dayal
Rahul Naithani
Innovator Filgrastim versus Generic Filgrastim in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Mobilization
South Asian Journal of Cancer
bone marrow transplant
cd34
granulocyte colony-stimulating factor
mobilization
author_facet Sadik Husian
Preethi Jeyaraman
S. K. Gupta
Reeta Rai
Sangeeta Pathak
Nitin Dayal
Rahul Naithani
author_sort Sadik Husian
title Innovator Filgrastim versus Generic Filgrastim in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Mobilization
title_short Innovator Filgrastim versus Generic Filgrastim in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Mobilization
title_full Innovator Filgrastim versus Generic Filgrastim in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Mobilization
title_fullStr Innovator Filgrastim versus Generic Filgrastim in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Mobilization
title_full_unstemmed Innovator Filgrastim versus Generic Filgrastim in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Mobilization
title_sort innovator filgrastim versus generic filgrastim in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation mobilization
publisher Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
series South Asian Journal of Cancer
issn 2278-330X
2278-4306
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Methods This is a retrospective study. G-CSF was administered in the dose of 10 μg/kg subcutaneous as a single dose for 4 days. On day 5, peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) apheresis was performed using Haemonetics MCS plus or COBE Spectra apheresis machine through a double-lumen central venous catheter. Primary outcome parameters were the total number of CD34+ HSCs/kg of recipient weight mobilized in peripheral blood and the number of days required for neutrophil and platelets engraftment, respectively. Objective We compared the effectiveness and safety of innovator filgrastim versus generic filgrastim in patients who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Results A total of 91 stem cell mobilizations was analyzed. There were 58 normal healthy donors for allogeneic HSCT and 33 patients for autologous HSCT. There was no statistically significant difference among groups in terms of total collected CD34+ cells value (p = 0.609). The mean time to neutrophil engraftment was 13.7 days in the innovator group and 13.2 days in the Grafeel group (p = 0.518). The mean time to platelet engraftment was 16.2 days in the innovator group and 14.8 days in the generic group (p = 0.435). The patient who received generic filgrastim had more febrile episodes during the course of transplantation (p = 0.020). Conclusion Generic filgrastim was found to be comparable to original filgrastim for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in normal healthy donors for allogeneic HSCT and patients for autologous HSCT.
topic bone marrow transplant
cd34
granulocyte colony-stimulating factor
mobilization
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0041-1729446
work_keys_str_mv AT sadikhusian innovatorfilgrastimversusgenericfilgrastiminhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationmobilization
AT preethijeyaraman innovatorfilgrastimversusgenericfilgrastiminhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationmobilization
AT skgupta innovatorfilgrastimversusgenericfilgrastiminhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationmobilization
AT reetarai innovatorfilgrastimversusgenericfilgrastiminhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationmobilization
AT sangeetapathak innovatorfilgrastimversusgenericfilgrastiminhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationmobilization
AT nitindayal innovatorfilgrastimversusgenericfilgrastiminhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationmobilization
AT rahulnaithani innovatorfilgrastimversusgenericfilgrastiminhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationmobilization
_version_ 1717814859428528128