Application of Field Blanks in Odour Emission Research

In the Netherlands field blanks are mandatory when sampling odour emission. Field blanks are matrices that have negligible or unmeasurable amounts of the substance of interest. They are used to document possible contamination during sampling, transport and storage of samples. Although field blanks a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: N. Ogink, J. Klarenbeek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AIDIC Servizi S.r.l. 2016-09-01
Series:Chemical Engineering Transactions
Online Access:https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/3532
id doaj-585964bdb3a44536a7939a40fba5b361
record_format Article
spelling doaj-585964bdb3a44536a7939a40fba5b3612021-02-19T21:00:29ZengAIDIC Servizi S.r.l.Chemical Engineering Transactions2283-92162016-09-015410.3303/CET1654005Application of Field Blanks in Odour Emission ResearchN. OginkJ. KlarenbeekIn the Netherlands field blanks are mandatory when sampling odour emission. Field blanks are matrices that have negligible or unmeasurable amounts of the substance of interest. They are used to document possible contamination during sampling, transport and storage of samples. Although field blanks are well established in odour emission research, interpreting the results needs further attention. This can be attributed to the fact that published information on the topic is rare if not absent. In the present study, general statistical measures of field blanks used in odour measurement research, are reported. The objective of the study was to provide insight in the distribution of field blank values. During 2013 and 2014, field blanks were analysed as part of regular investigations into odour emissions. Point sources were most frequently observed (87%), as well as the use of diluting stack samplers (72%). It wasfound that average odour concentration and standard deviation of the dataset were 1.39 and 0.379 log(ouE/m3) respectively, both expressed on a logarithmic scale (base 10). Median values of odour concentration of field blanks taken with stack sampler methods, differed significantly from lung sample methods, being a factor two higher. Since the implementation of stack sampler methods requires moreprocessing aids than the lung method, the chances are that that traces of odour are carried over from one sampling sessions to another. This stresses the need for effective cleaning of sampling equipment between sampling sessions.https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/3532
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author N. Ogink
J. Klarenbeek
spellingShingle N. Ogink
J. Klarenbeek
Application of Field Blanks in Odour Emission Research
Chemical Engineering Transactions
author_facet N. Ogink
J. Klarenbeek
author_sort N. Ogink
title Application of Field Blanks in Odour Emission Research
title_short Application of Field Blanks in Odour Emission Research
title_full Application of Field Blanks in Odour Emission Research
title_fullStr Application of Field Blanks in Odour Emission Research
title_full_unstemmed Application of Field Blanks in Odour Emission Research
title_sort application of field blanks in odour emission research
publisher AIDIC Servizi S.r.l.
series Chemical Engineering Transactions
issn 2283-9216
publishDate 2016-09-01
description In the Netherlands field blanks are mandatory when sampling odour emission. Field blanks are matrices that have negligible or unmeasurable amounts of the substance of interest. They are used to document possible contamination during sampling, transport and storage of samples. Although field blanks are well established in odour emission research, interpreting the results needs further attention. This can be attributed to the fact that published information on the topic is rare if not absent. In the present study, general statistical measures of field blanks used in odour measurement research, are reported. The objective of the study was to provide insight in the distribution of field blank values. During 2013 and 2014, field blanks were analysed as part of regular investigations into odour emissions. Point sources were most frequently observed (87%), as well as the use of diluting stack samplers (72%). It wasfound that average odour concentration and standard deviation of the dataset were 1.39 and 0.379 log(ouE/m3) respectively, both expressed on a logarithmic scale (base 10). Median values of odour concentration of field blanks taken with stack sampler methods, differed significantly from lung sample methods, being a factor two higher. Since the implementation of stack sampler methods requires moreprocessing aids than the lung method, the chances are that that traces of odour are carried over from one sampling sessions to another. This stresses the need for effective cleaning of sampling equipment between sampling sessions.
url https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/3532
work_keys_str_mv AT nogink applicationoffieldblanksinodouremissionresearch
AT jklarenbeek applicationoffieldblanksinodouremissionresearch
_version_ 1724260545390968832