Recognizing biased reasoning: Conflict detection during decision-making and decision-evaluation

• Main Authors: Eva M. Janssen, Samuël B. Velinga, Wim de Neys, Tamara van Gog
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier 2021-06-01
• Series: Acta Psychologica
• Subjects: Reasoning and decision-making; Decision-evaluation; Heuristics and biases; Conflict detection
• Online Access: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000169182100072X

Although it is well established that our thinking can often be biased, the precise cognitive mechanisms underlying these biases are still debated. The present study builds on recent research showing that biased reasoners often seem aware that their reasoning is incorrect; they show signs of conflict detection. One important shortcoming in this research is that the conflict detection effect has only been studied with classic problem-solving tasks, requiring people to make a decision themselves. However, in many reasoning situations people are confronted with decisions already made by others. Therefore, the present study (N = 159) investigated whether conflict detection occurs not only during reasoning on problem-solving tasks (i.e., decision-making), but also on vignette tasks, requiring participants to evaluate decisions made by others. We analyzed participants' conflict detection sensitivity on confidence and response time measures. Results showed that conflict detection occurred during both decision-making and decision-evaluation, as indicated by a decreased confidence. The response time index appeared to be a less reliable measure of conflict detection on the novel tasks. These findings are very relevant for studying reasoning in contexts in which recognizing reasoning errors is important; for instance, in education where teachers have to give feedback on students' reasoning.