Disentangling stability and flexibility degrees in Parkinson’s disease using a computational postural control model

Abstract Background Impaired postural control in Parkinson’s disease (PD) seriously compromises life quality. Although balance training improves mobility and postural stability, lack of quantitative studies on the neurophysiological mechanisms of balance training in PD impedes the development of pat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zahra Rahmati, Alfred C. Schouten, Saeed Behzadipour, Ghorban Taghizadeh, Keikhosrow Firoozbakhsh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-08-01
Series:Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12984-019-0574-0
Description
Summary:Abstract Background Impaired postural control in Parkinson’s disease (PD) seriously compromises life quality. Although balance training improves mobility and postural stability, lack of quantitative studies on the neurophysiological mechanisms of balance training in PD impedes the development of patient-specific therapies. We evaluated the effects of a balance-training program using functional balance and mobility tests, posturography, and a postural control model. Methods Center-of-pressure (COP) data of 40 PD patients before and after a 12-session balance-training program, and 20 healthy control subjects were recorded in four conditions with two tasks on a rigid surface (R-tasks) and two on foam. A postural control model was fitted to describe the posturography data. The model comprises a neuromuscular controller, a time delay, and a gain scaling the internal disturbance torque. Results Patients’ axial rigidity before training resulted in slower COP velocity in R-tasks; which was reflected as lower internal torque gain. Furthermore, patients exhibited poor stability on foam, remarked by abnormal higher sway amplitude. Lower control parameters as well as higher time delay were responsible for patients’ abnormal high sway amplitude. Balance training improved all clinical scores on functional balance and mobility. Consistently, improved ‘flexibility’ appeared as enhanced sway velocity (increased internal torque gain). Balance training also helped patients to develop the ‘stability degree’ (increase control parameters), and to respond more quickly in unstable condition of stance on foam. Conclusions Projection of the common posturography measures on a postural control model provided a quantitative framework for unraveling the neurophysiological factors and different recovery mechanisms in impaired postural control in PD.
ISSN:1743-0003