No preference for direct versus averted gaze in autistic adults: a reinforced preferential looking paradigm

Abstract Background With the overarching objective to gain better insights into social attention in autistic adults, the present study addresses three outstanding issues about face processing in autism. First, do autistic adults display a preference for mouths over eyes; second, do they avoid direct...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elise Clin, Pauline Maes, Fanny Stercq, Mikhail Kissine
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-11-01
Series:Molecular Autism
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13229-020-00398-3
id doaj-5897ff24e78d4b968ebcb503c6c2faed
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5897ff24e78d4b968ebcb503c6c2faed2020-11-25T04:02:49ZengBMCMolecular Autism2040-23922020-11-0111111710.1186/s13229-020-00398-3No preference for direct versus averted gaze in autistic adults: a reinforced preferential looking paradigmElise Clin0Pauline Maes1Fanny Stercq2Mikhail Kissine3ACTE at LaDisco and ULB Neuroscience Institute, Université libre de BruxellesACTE at LaDisco and ULB Neuroscience Institute, Université libre de BruxellesACTE at LaDisco and ULB Neuroscience Institute, Université libre de BruxellesACTE at LaDisco and ULB Neuroscience Institute, Université libre de BruxellesAbstract Background With the overarching objective to gain better insights into social attention in autistic adults, the present study addresses three outstanding issues about face processing in autism. First, do autistic adults display a preference for mouths over eyes; second, do they avoid direct gaze; third, is atypical visual exploration of faces in autism mediated by gender, social anxiety or alexithymia? Methods We used a novel reinforced preferential looking paradigm with a group of autistic adults (n = 43, 23 women) pairwise matched on age with neurotypical participants (n = 43, 21 women). Participants watched 28 different pairs of 5 s video recordings of a speaking person: the two videos, simultaneously displayed on the screen, were identical except that gaze was directed at the camera in one video and averted in the other. After a 680 ms transition phase, a short reinforcement animation appeared on the side that had displayed the direct gaze. Results None of the groups showed a preference for mouths over eyes. However, neurotypical participants fixated significantly more the stimuli with direct gaze, while no such preference emerged in autistic participants. As the experiment progressed, neurotypical participants also increasingly anticipated the appearance of the reinforcement, based on the location of the stimulus with the direct gaze, while no such anticipation emerged in autistic participants. Limitations Our autistic participants scored higher on the social anxiety and alexithymia questionnaires than neurotypicals. Future studies should match neurotypical and autistic participants on social anxiety and alexithymia and complement questionnaires with physiological measures of anxiety. Conclusions The absence of preference for direct versus averted gaze in the autistic group is probably due to difficulties in distinguishing eye gaze direction, potentially linked to a reduced spontaneous exploration or avoidance of the eye region. Social attention and preference for direct versus averted gaze correlated with alexithymia and social anxiety scores, but not gender.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13229-020-00398-3AutismEye-trackingEye gaze directionSocial attentionAlexithymiaSocial anxiety
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Elise Clin
Pauline Maes
Fanny Stercq
Mikhail Kissine
spellingShingle Elise Clin
Pauline Maes
Fanny Stercq
Mikhail Kissine
No preference for direct versus averted gaze in autistic adults: a reinforced preferential looking paradigm
Molecular Autism
Autism
Eye-tracking
Eye gaze direction
Social attention
Alexithymia
Social anxiety
author_facet Elise Clin
Pauline Maes
Fanny Stercq
Mikhail Kissine
author_sort Elise Clin
title No preference for direct versus averted gaze in autistic adults: a reinforced preferential looking paradigm
title_short No preference for direct versus averted gaze in autistic adults: a reinforced preferential looking paradigm
title_full No preference for direct versus averted gaze in autistic adults: a reinforced preferential looking paradigm
title_fullStr No preference for direct versus averted gaze in autistic adults: a reinforced preferential looking paradigm
title_full_unstemmed No preference for direct versus averted gaze in autistic adults: a reinforced preferential looking paradigm
title_sort no preference for direct versus averted gaze in autistic adults: a reinforced preferential looking paradigm
publisher BMC
series Molecular Autism
issn 2040-2392
publishDate 2020-11-01
description Abstract Background With the overarching objective to gain better insights into social attention in autistic adults, the present study addresses three outstanding issues about face processing in autism. First, do autistic adults display a preference for mouths over eyes; second, do they avoid direct gaze; third, is atypical visual exploration of faces in autism mediated by gender, social anxiety or alexithymia? Methods We used a novel reinforced preferential looking paradigm with a group of autistic adults (n = 43, 23 women) pairwise matched on age with neurotypical participants (n = 43, 21 women). Participants watched 28 different pairs of 5 s video recordings of a speaking person: the two videos, simultaneously displayed on the screen, were identical except that gaze was directed at the camera in one video and averted in the other. After a 680 ms transition phase, a short reinforcement animation appeared on the side that had displayed the direct gaze. Results None of the groups showed a preference for mouths over eyes. However, neurotypical participants fixated significantly more the stimuli with direct gaze, while no such preference emerged in autistic participants. As the experiment progressed, neurotypical participants also increasingly anticipated the appearance of the reinforcement, based on the location of the stimulus with the direct gaze, while no such anticipation emerged in autistic participants. Limitations Our autistic participants scored higher on the social anxiety and alexithymia questionnaires than neurotypicals. Future studies should match neurotypical and autistic participants on social anxiety and alexithymia and complement questionnaires with physiological measures of anxiety. Conclusions The absence of preference for direct versus averted gaze in the autistic group is probably due to difficulties in distinguishing eye gaze direction, potentially linked to a reduced spontaneous exploration or avoidance of the eye region. Social attention and preference for direct versus averted gaze correlated with alexithymia and social anxiety scores, but not gender.
topic Autism
Eye-tracking
Eye gaze direction
Social attention
Alexithymia
Social anxiety
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13229-020-00398-3
work_keys_str_mv AT eliseclin nopreferencefordirectversusavertedgazeinautisticadultsareinforcedpreferentiallookingparadigm
AT paulinemaes nopreferencefordirectversusavertedgazeinautisticadultsareinforcedpreferentiallookingparadigm
AT fannystercq nopreferencefordirectversusavertedgazeinautisticadultsareinforcedpreferentiallookingparadigm
AT mikhailkissine nopreferencefordirectversusavertedgazeinautisticadultsareinforcedpreferentiallookingparadigm
_version_ 1724442217561456640