No preference for direct versus averted gaze in autistic adults: a reinforced preferential looking paradigm
Abstract Background With the overarching objective to gain better insights into social attention in autistic adults, the present study addresses three outstanding issues about face processing in autism. First, do autistic adults display a preference for mouths over eyes; second, do they avoid direct...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-11-01
|
Series: | Molecular Autism |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13229-020-00398-3 |
id |
doaj-5897ff24e78d4b968ebcb503c6c2faed |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5897ff24e78d4b968ebcb503c6c2faed2020-11-25T04:02:49ZengBMCMolecular Autism2040-23922020-11-0111111710.1186/s13229-020-00398-3No preference for direct versus averted gaze in autistic adults: a reinforced preferential looking paradigmElise Clin0Pauline Maes1Fanny Stercq2Mikhail Kissine3ACTE at LaDisco and ULB Neuroscience Institute, Université libre de BruxellesACTE at LaDisco and ULB Neuroscience Institute, Université libre de BruxellesACTE at LaDisco and ULB Neuroscience Institute, Université libre de BruxellesACTE at LaDisco and ULB Neuroscience Institute, Université libre de BruxellesAbstract Background With the overarching objective to gain better insights into social attention in autistic adults, the present study addresses three outstanding issues about face processing in autism. First, do autistic adults display a preference for mouths over eyes; second, do they avoid direct gaze; third, is atypical visual exploration of faces in autism mediated by gender, social anxiety or alexithymia? Methods We used a novel reinforced preferential looking paradigm with a group of autistic adults (n = 43, 23 women) pairwise matched on age with neurotypical participants (n = 43, 21 women). Participants watched 28 different pairs of 5 s video recordings of a speaking person: the two videos, simultaneously displayed on the screen, were identical except that gaze was directed at the camera in one video and averted in the other. After a 680 ms transition phase, a short reinforcement animation appeared on the side that had displayed the direct gaze. Results None of the groups showed a preference for mouths over eyes. However, neurotypical participants fixated significantly more the stimuli with direct gaze, while no such preference emerged in autistic participants. As the experiment progressed, neurotypical participants also increasingly anticipated the appearance of the reinforcement, based on the location of the stimulus with the direct gaze, while no such anticipation emerged in autistic participants. Limitations Our autistic participants scored higher on the social anxiety and alexithymia questionnaires than neurotypicals. Future studies should match neurotypical and autistic participants on social anxiety and alexithymia and complement questionnaires with physiological measures of anxiety. Conclusions The absence of preference for direct versus averted gaze in the autistic group is probably due to difficulties in distinguishing eye gaze direction, potentially linked to a reduced spontaneous exploration or avoidance of the eye region. Social attention and preference for direct versus averted gaze correlated with alexithymia and social anxiety scores, but not gender.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13229-020-00398-3AutismEye-trackingEye gaze directionSocial attentionAlexithymiaSocial anxiety |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Elise Clin Pauline Maes Fanny Stercq Mikhail Kissine |
spellingShingle |
Elise Clin Pauline Maes Fanny Stercq Mikhail Kissine No preference for direct versus averted gaze in autistic adults: a reinforced preferential looking paradigm Molecular Autism Autism Eye-tracking Eye gaze direction Social attention Alexithymia Social anxiety |
author_facet |
Elise Clin Pauline Maes Fanny Stercq Mikhail Kissine |
author_sort |
Elise Clin |
title |
No preference for direct versus averted gaze in autistic adults: a reinforced preferential looking paradigm |
title_short |
No preference for direct versus averted gaze in autistic adults: a reinforced preferential looking paradigm |
title_full |
No preference for direct versus averted gaze in autistic adults: a reinforced preferential looking paradigm |
title_fullStr |
No preference for direct versus averted gaze in autistic adults: a reinforced preferential looking paradigm |
title_full_unstemmed |
No preference for direct versus averted gaze in autistic adults: a reinforced preferential looking paradigm |
title_sort |
no preference for direct versus averted gaze in autistic adults: a reinforced preferential looking paradigm |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Molecular Autism |
issn |
2040-2392 |
publishDate |
2020-11-01 |
description |
Abstract Background With the overarching objective to gain better insights into social attention in autistic adults, the present study addresses three outstanding issues about face processing in autism. First, do autistic adults display a preference for mouths over eyes; second, do they avoid direct gaze; third, is atypical visual exploration of faces in autism mediated by gender, social anxiety or alexithymia? Methods We used a novel reinforced preferential looking paradigm with a group of autistic adults (n = 43, 23 women) pairwise matched on age with neurotypical participants (n = 43, 21 women). Participants watched 28 different pairs of 5 s video recordings of a speaking person: the two videos, simultaneously displayed on the screen, were identical except that gaze was directed at the camera in one video and averted in the other. After a 680 ms transition phase, a short reinforcement animation appeared on the side that had displayed the direct gaze. Results None of the groups showed a preference for mouths over eyes. However, neurotypical participants fixated significantly more the stimuli with direct gaze, while no such preference emerged in autistic participants. As the experiment progressed, neurotypical participants also increasingly anticipated the appearance of the reinforcement, based on the location of the stimulus with the direct gaze, while no such anticipation emerged in autistic participants. Limitations Our autistic participants scored higher on the social anxiety and alexithymia questionnaires than neurotypicals. Future studies should match neurotypical and autistic participants on social anxiety and alexithymia and complement questionnaires with physiological measures of anxiety. Conclusions The absence of preference for direct versus averted gaze in the autistic group is probably due to difficulties in distinguishing eye gaze direction, potentially linked to a reduced spontaneous exploration or avoidance of the eye region. Social attention and preference for direct versus averted gaze correlated with alexithymia and social anxiety scores, but not gender. |
topic |
Autism Eye-tracking Eye gaze direction Social attention Alexithymia Social anxiety |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13229-020-00398-3 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT eliseclin nopreferencefordirectversusavertedgazeinautisticadultsareinforcedpreferentiallookingparadigm AT paulinemaes nopreferencefordirectversusavertedgazeinautisticadultsareinforcedpreferentiallookingparadigm AT fannystercq nopreferencefordirectversusavertedgazeinautisticadultsareinforcedpreferentiallookingparadigm AT mikhailkissine nopreferencefordirectversusavertedgazeinautisticadultsareinforcedpreferentiallookingparadigm |
_version_ |
1724442217561456640 |