Ranking of Business Process Simulation Software Tools with DEX/QQ Hierarchical Decision Model.

The omnipresent need for optimisation requires constant improvements of companies' business processes (BPs). Minimising the risk of inappropriate BP being implemented is usually performed by simulating the newly developed BP under various initial conditions and "what-if" scenarios. An...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nadja Damij, Pavle Boškoski, Marko Bohanec, Biljana Mileva Boshkoska
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4752506?pdf=render
id doaj-589aaa73b0a649128cae766c9a2f435c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-589aaa73b0a649128cae766c9a2f435c2020-11-25T02:31:24ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01112e014839110.1371/journal.pone.0148391Ranking of Business Process Simulation Software Tools with DEX/QQ Hierarchical Decision Model.Nadja DamijPavle BoškoskiMarko BohanecBiljana Mileva BoshkoskaThe omnipresent need for optimisation requires constant improvements of companies' business processes (BPs). Minimising the risk of inappropriate BP being implemented is usually performed by simulating the newly developed BP under various initial conditions and "what-if" scenarios. An effectual business process simulations software (BPSS) is a prerequisite for accurate analysis of an BP. Characterisation of an BPSS tool is a challenging task due to the complex selection criteria that includes quality of visual aspects, simulation capabilities, statistical facilities, quality reporting etc. Under such circumstances, making an optimal decision is challenging. Therefore, various decision support models are employed aiding the BPSS tool selection. The currently established decision support models are either proprietary or comprise only a limited subset of criteria, which affects their accuracy. Addressing this issue, this paper proposes a new hierarchical decision support model for ranking of BPSS based on their technical characteristics by employing DEX and qualitative to quantitative (QQ) methodology. Consequently, the decision expert feeds the required information in a systematic and user friendly manner. There are three significant contributions of the proposed approach. Firstly, the proposed hierarchical model is easily extendible for adding new criteria in the hierarchical structure. Secondly, a fully operational decision support system (DSS) tool that implements the proposed hierarchical model is presented. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed hierarchical model is assessed by comparing the resulting rankings of BPSS with respect to currently available results.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4752506?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nadja Damij
Pavle Boškoski
Marko Bohanec
Biljana Mileva Boshkoska
spellingShingle Nadja Damij
Pavle Boškoski
Marko Bohanec
Biljana Mileva Boshkoska
Ranking of Business Process Simulation Software Tools with DEX/QQ Hierarchical Decision Model.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Nadja Damij
Pavle Boškoski
Marko Bohanec
Biljana Mileva Boshkoska
author_sort Nadja Damij
title Ranking of Business Process Simulation Software Tools with DEX/QQ Hierarchical Decision Model.
title_short Ranking of Business Process Simulation Software Tools with DEX/QQ Hierarchical Decision Model.
title_full Ranking of Business Process Simulation Software Tools with DEX/QQ Hierarchical Decision Model.
title_fullStr Ranking of Business Process Simulation Software Tools with DEX/QQ Hierarchical Decision Model.
title_full_unstemmed Ranking of Business Process Simulation Software Tools with DEX/QQ Hierarchical Decision Model.
title_sort ranking of business process simulation software tools with dex/qq hierarchical decision model.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description The omnipresent need for optimisation requires constant improvements of companies' business processes (BPs). Minimising the risk of inappropriate BP being implemented is usually performed by simulating the newly developed BP under various initial conditions and "what-if" scenarios. An effectual business process simulations software (BPSS) is a prerequisite for accurate analysis of an BP. Characterisation of an BPSS tool is a challenging task due to the complex selection criteria that includes quality of visual aspects, simulation capabilities, statistical facilities, quality reporting etc. Under such circumstances, making an optimal decision is challenging. Therefore, various decision support models are employed aiding the BPSS tool selection. The currently established decision support models are either proprietary or comprise only a limited subset of criteria, which affects their accuracy. Addressing this issue, this paper proposes a new hierarchical decision support model for ranking of BPSS based on their technical characteristics by employing DEX and qualitative to quantitative (QQ) methodology. Consequently, the decision expert feeds the required information in a systematic and user friendly manner. There are three significant contributions of the proposed approach. Firstly, the proposed hierarchical model is easily extendible for adding new criteria in the hierarchical structure. Secondly, a fully operational decision support system (DSS) tool that implements the proposed hierarchical model is presented. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed hierarchical model is assessed by comparing the resulting rankings of BPSS with respect to currently available results.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4752506?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT nadjadamij rankingofbusinessprocesssimulationsoftwaretoolswithdexqqhierarchicaldecisionmodel
AT pavleboskoski rankingofbusinessprocesssimulationsoftwaretoolswithdexqqhierarchicaldecisionmodel
AT markobohanec rankingofbusinessprocesssimulationsoftwaretoolswithdexqqhierarchicaldecisionmodel
AT biljanamilevaboshkoska rankingofbusinessprocesssimulationsoftwaretoolswithdexqqhierarchicaldecisionmodel
_version_ 1724824954386513920