A methodology for performing sensitivity analysis in dynamic fuel cycle simulation studies applied to a PWR fleet simulated with the CLASS tool

Fuel cycle simulators are used worldwide to provide scientific assessment to fuel cycle future strategies. Those tools help understanding the fuel cycle physics and determining the most impacting drivers at the cycle scale. A standard scenario calculation is usually based on a set of operational ass...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thiollière Nicolas, Clavel Jean-Baptiste, Courtin Fanny, Doligez Xavier, Ernoult Marc, Issoufou Zakari, Krivtchik Guillaume, Leniau Baptiste, Mouginot Baptiste, Bidaud Adrien, David Sylvain, Lebrin Victor, Perigois Carole, Richet Yann, Somaini Alice
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2018-01-01
Series:EPJ Nuclear Sciences & Technologies
Online Access:https://www.epj-n.org/articles/epjn/full_html/2018/01/epjn170042/epjn170042.html
id doaj-589bc1b5939e4664b47e2326eaafc9e2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-589bc1b5939e4664b47e2326eaafc9e22021-04-02T13:10:59ZengEDP SciencesEPJ Nuclear Sciences & Technologies2491-92922018-01-0141310.1051/epjn/2018009epjn170042A methodology for performing sensitivity analysis in dynamic fuel cycle simulation studies applied to a PWR fleet simulated with the CLASS toolThiollière Nicolas0Clavel Jean-Baptiste1Courtin Fanny2Doligez Xavier3Ernoult Marc4Issoufou Zakari5Krivtchik Guillaume6Leniau Baptiste7Mouginot Baptiste8Bidaud Adrien9David Sylvain10Lebrin Victor11Perigois Carole12Richet Yann13Somaini Alice14Subatech, IMTA-IN2P3/CNRS-UniversitéIRSN/PSN-EXP/SNC/LNCSubatech, IMTA-IN2P3/CNRS-UniversitéInstitut de Physique Nucléaire d’Orsay, CNRS-IN2P3/Univ. Paris-SudInstitut de Physique Nucléaire d’Orsay, CNRS-IN2P3/Univ. Paris-SudInstitut de Physique Nucléaire d’Orsay, CNRS-IN2P3/Univ. Paris-SudCEA, DEN, Cadarache, DER, SPRC/LECYSubatech, IMTA-IN2P3/CNRS-UniversitéUniv. of Wisconsin Madison, Department of Nuclear Engineering and Engineering PhysicsLaboratoire de Physique Subatomique et de Cosmologie, Université Grenoble-Alpes, CNRS/IN2P3Institut de Physique Nucléaire d’Orsay, CNRS-IN2P3/Univ. Paris-SudSubatech, IMTA-IN2P3/CNRS-UniversitéSubatech, IMTA-IN2P3/CNRS-UniversitéIRSN/PSN-EXP/SNC/LNCInstitut de Physique Nucléaire d’Orsay, CNRS-IN2P3/Univ. Paris-SudFuel cycle simulators are used worldwide to provide scientific assessment to fuel cycle future strategies. Those tools help understanding the fuel cycle physics and determining the most impacting drivers at the cycle scale. A standard scenario calculation is usually based on a set of operational assumptions, such as reactor Burn-Up, deployment history, cooling time, etc. Scenario output is then the evolution of isotopes mass in the facilities that composes the nuclear fleet. The increase of computing capacities and the use of neutron data fast predictors provide new opportunities in nuclear scenario studies. Indeed, a very high number of calculations is possible, which allows testing a high number of operational assumptions combinations. The global sensitivity analysis (GSA) formalism is specifically well adapted for this kind of problem. In this new framework, a scenario study is based on the sampling of operational data, which become input variables. A first result of a scenario study is the highlight of relations between operational input data and outputs. Input variable subspace that satisfy optimization criteria on an output, such as plutonium incineration or stabilization, can also be determined. In this paper, a focus is made on the methodology based on GSA. This innovative methodology is presented and applied to a simple fleet simulation composed of a PWR-UOx fuel and a PWR-MOx fuel. Calculations are done with the fuel cycle simulator CLASS developed by the CNRS/IN2P3 in collaboration with IRSN. The design of experiment is built from five fuel cycle input sampled variables. Sensitivity indices have been calculated on plutonium and minor actinide (MA) production. It shows that the PWR-UOx Burn-Up and the fraction of PWR-MOx fuel are the most important input variables that explain the plutonium production. For the MA production, main drivers depend strongly on isotopes. Sensitivity analysis also reveals input variable subspace responsible of simulation crash, what led to an important improvement of the model algorithms. An equilibrium condition on the plutonium mass in the stockpile used for building MOx fuel has been applied. The solution is represented as a subspace in the PWR-UOx Burn-Up and PWR-MOx fraction input space. For instance, achieving a plutonium equilibrium in a stockpile fed by a PWR-UOx that operates at 40 GWd/t requires a PWR-MOx fraction between 9 and 14%. This study also provides data related to plutonium incineration induced by the utilization of the MOx.https://www.epj-n.org/articles/epjn/full_html/2018/01/epjn170042/epjn170042.html
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Thiollière Nicolas
Clavel Jean-Baptiste
Courtin Fanny
Doligez Xavier
Ernoult Marc
Issoufou Zakari
Krivtchik Guillaume
Leniau Baptiste
Mouginot Baptiste
Bidaud Adrien
David Sylvain
Lebrin Victor
Perigois Carole
Richet Yann
Somaini Alice
spellingShingle Thiollière Nicolas
Clavel Jean-Baptiste
Courtin Fanny
Doligez Xavier
Ernoult Marc
Issoufou Zakari
Krivtchik Guillaume
Leniau Baptiste
Mouginot Baptiste
Bidaud Adrien
David Sylvain
Lebrin Victor
Perigois Carole
Richet Yann
Somaini Alice
A methodology for performing sensitivity analysis in dynamic fuel cycle simulation studies applied to a PWR fleet simulated with the CLASS tool
EPJ Nuclear Sciences & Technologies
author_facet Thiollière Nicolas
Clavel Jean-Baptiste
Courtin Fanny
Doligez Xavier
Ernoult Marc
Issoufou Zakari
Krivtchik Guillaume
Leniau Baptiste
Mouginot Baptiste
Bidaud Adrien
David Sylvain
Lebrin Victor
Perigois Carole
Richet Yann
Somaini Alice
author_sort Thiollière Nicolas
title A methodology for performing sensitivity analysis in dynamic fuel cycle simulation studies applied to a PWR fleet simulated with the CLASS tool
title_short A methodology for performing sensitivity analysis in dynamic fuel cycle simulation studies applied to a PWR fleet simulated with the CLASS tool
title_full A methodology for performing sensitivity analysis in dynamic fuel cycle simulation studies applied to a PWR fleet simulated with the CLASS tool
title_fullStr A methodology for performing sensitivity analysis in dynamic fuel cycle simulation studies applied to a PWR fleet simulated with the CLASS tool
title_full_unstemmed A methodology for performing sensitivity analysis in dynamic fuel cycle simulation studies applied to a PWR fleet simulated with the CLASS tool
title_sort methodology for performing sensitivity analysis in dynamic fuel cycle simulation studies applied to a pwr fleet simulated with the class tool
publisher EDP Sciences
series EPJ Nuclear Sciences & Technologies
issn 2491-9292
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Fuel cycle simulators are used worldwide to provide scientific assessment to fuel cycle future strategies. Those tools help understanding the fuel cycle physics and determining the most impacting drivers at the cycle scale. A standard scenario calculation is usually based on a set of operational assumptions, such as reactor Burn-Up, deployment history, cooling time, etc. Scenario output is then the evolution of isotopes mass in the facilities that composes the nuclear fleet. The increase of computing capacities and the use of neutron data fast predictors provide new opportunities in nuclear scenario studies. Indeed, a very high number of calculations is possible, which allows testing a high number of operational assumptions combinations. The global sensitivity analysis (GSA) formalism is specifically well adapted for this kind of problem. In this new framework, a scenario study is based on the sampling of operational data, which become input variables. A first result of a scenario study is the highlight of relations between operational input data and outputs. Input variable subspace that satisfy optimization criteria on an output, such as plutonium incineration or stabilization, can also be determined. In this paper, a focus is made on the methodology based on GSA. This innovative methodology is presented and applied to a simple fleet simulation composed of a PWR-UOx fuel and a PWR-MOx fuel. Calculations are done with the fuel cycle simulator CLASS developed by the CNRS/IN2P3 in collaboration with IRSN. The design of experiment is built from five fuel cycle input sampled variables. Sensitivity indices have been calculated on plutonium and minor actinide (MA) production. It shows that the PWR-UOx Burn-Up and the fraction of PWR-MOx fuel are the most important input variables that explain the plutonium production. For the MA production, main drivers depend strongly on isotopes. Sensitivity analysis also reveals input variable subspace responsible of simulation crash, what led to an important improvement of the model algorithms. An equilibrium condition on the plutonium mass in the stockpile used for building MOx fuel has been applied. The solution is represented as a subspace in the PWR-UOx Burn-Up and PWR-MOx fraction input space. For instance, achieving a plutonium equilibrium in a stockpile fed by a PWR-UOx that operates at 40 GWd/t requires a PWR-MOx fraction between 9 and 14%. This study also provides data related to plutonium incineration induced by the utilization of the MOx.
url https://www.epj-n.org/articles/epjn/full_html/2018/01/epjn170042/epjn170042.html
work_keys_str_mv AT thiollierenicolas amethodologyforperformingsensitivityanalysisindynamicfuelcyclesimulationstudiesappliedtoapwrfleetsimulatedwiththeclasstool
AT claveljeanbaptiste amethodologyforperformingsensitivityanalysisindynamicfuelcyclesimulationstudiesappliedtoapwrfleetsimulatedwiththeclasstool
AT courtinfanny amethodologyforperformingsensitivityanalysisindynamicfuelcyclesimulationstudiesappliedtoapwrfleetsimulatedwiththeclasstool
AT doligezxavier amethodologyforperformingsensitivityanalysisindynamicfuelcyclesimulationstudiesappliedtoapwrfleetsimulatedwiththeclasstool
AT ernoultmarc amethodologyforperformingsensitivityanalysisindynamicfuelcyclesimulationstudiesappliedtoapwrfleetsimulatedwiththeclasstool
AT issoufouzakari amethodologyforperformingsensitivityanalysisindynamicfuelcyclesimulationstudiesappliedtoapwrfleetsimulatedwiththeclasstool
AT krivtchikguillaume amethodologyforperformingsensitivityanalysisindynamicfuelcyclesimulationstudiesappliedtoapwrfleetsimulatedwiththeclasstool
AT leniaubaptiste amethodologyforperformingsensitivityanalysisindynamicfuelcyclesimulationstudiesappliedtoapwrfleetsimulatedwiththeclasstool
AT mouginotbaptiste amethodologyforperformingsensitivityanalysisindynamicfuelcyclesimulationstudiesappliedtoapwrfleetsimulatedwiththeclasstool
AT bidaudadrien amethodologyforperformingsensitivityanalysisindynamicfuelcyclesimulationstudiesappliedtoapwrfleetsimulatedwiththeclasstool
AT davidsylvain amethodologyforperformingsensitivityanalysisindynamicfuelcyclesimulationstudiesappliedtoapwrfleetsimulatedwiththeclasstool
AT lebrinvictor amethodologyforperformingsensitivityanalysisindynamicfuelcyclesimulationstudiesappliedtoapwrfleetsimulatedwiththeclasstool
AT perigoiscarole amethodologyforperformingsensitivityanalysisindynamicfuelcyclesimulationstudiesappliedtoapwrfleetsimulatedwiththeclasstool
AT richetyann amethodologyforperformingsensitivityanalysisindynamicfuelcyclesimulationstudiesappliedtoapwrfleetsimulatedwiththeclasstool
AT somainialice amethodologyforperformingsensitivityanalysisindynamicfuelcyclesimulationstudiesappliedtoapwrfleetsimulatedwiththeclasstool
AT thiollierenicolas methodologyforperformingsensitivityanalysisindynamicfuelcyclesimulationstudiesappliedtoapwrfleetsimulatedwiththeclasstool
AT claveljeanbaptiste methodologyforperformingsensitivityanalysisindynamicfuelcyclesimulationstudiesappliedtoapwrfleetsimulatedwiththeclasstool
AT courtinfanny methodologyforperformingsensitivityanalysisindynamicfuelcyclesimulationstudiesappliedtoapwrfleetsimulatedwiththeclasstool
AT doligezxavier methodologyforperformingsensitivityanalysisindynamicfuelcyclesimulationstudiesappliedtoapwrfleetsimulatedwiththeclasstool
AT ernoultmarc methodologyforperformingsensitivityanalysisindynamicfuelcyclesimulationstudiesappliedtoapwrfleetsimulatedwiththeclasstool
AT issoufouzakari methodologyforperformingsensitivityanalysisindynamicfuelcyclesimulationstudiesappliedtoapwrfleetsimulatedwiththeclasstool
AT krivtchikguillaume methodologyforperformingsensitivityanalysisindynamicfuelcyclesimulationstudiesappliedtoapwrfleetsimulatedwiththeclasstool
AT leniaubaptiste methodologyforperformingsensitivityanalysisindynamicfuelcyclesimulationstudiesappliedtoapwrfleetsimulatedwiththeclasstool
AT mouginotbaptiste methodologyforperformingsensitivityanalysisindynamicfuelcyclesimulationstudiesappliedtoapwrfleetsimulatedwiththeclasstool
AT bidaudadrien methodologyforperformingsensitivityanalysisindynamicfuelcyclesimulationstudiesappliedtoapwrfleetsimulatedwiththeclasstool
AT davidsylvain methodologyforperformingsensitivityanalysisindynamicfuelcyclesimulationstudiesappliedtoapwrfleetsimulatedwiththeclasstool
AT lebrinvictor methodologyforperformingsensitivityanalysisindynamicfuelcyclesimulationstudiesappliedtoapwrfleetsimulatedwiththeclasstool
AT perigoiscarole methodologyforperformingsensitivityanalysisindynamicfuelcyclesimulationstudiesappliedtoapwrfleetsimulatedwiththeclasstool
AT richetyann methodologyforperformingsensitivityanalysisindynamicfuelcyclesimulationstudiesappliedtoapwrfleetsimulatedwiththeclasstool
AT somainialice methodologyforperformingsensitivityanalysisindynamicfuelcyclesimulationstudiesappliedtoapwrfleetsimulatedwiththeclasstool
_version_ 1721566028791545856