Pyrethroid treatment of cattle for tsetse control: reducing its impact on dung fauna.

BACKGROUND:African trypansomiases of humans and animals can be controlled by attacking the vectors, various species of tsetse fly. Treatment of cattle with pyrethroids to kill tsetse as they feed is the most cost-effective method. However, such treatments can contaminate cattle dung, thereby killing...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Glyn A Vale, John W Hargrove, Andrew Chamisa, Ian F Grant, Stephen J Torr
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-03-01
Series:PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4349886?pdf=render
id doaj-58dd3b9145f5490dadddd6df827a99ef
record_format Article
spelling doaj-58dd3b9145f5490dadddd6df827a99ef2020-11-25T00:59:17ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases1935-27271935-27352015-03-0193e000356010.1371/journal.pntd.0003560Pyrethroid treatment of cattle for tsetse control: reducing its impact on dung fauna.Glyn A ValeJohn W HargroveAndrew ChamisaIan F GrantStephen J TorrBACKGROUND:African trypansomiases of humans and animals can be controlled by attacking the vectors, various species of tsetse fly. Treatment of cattle with pyrethroids to kill tsetse as they feed is the most cost-effective method. However, such treatments can contaminate cattle dung, thereby killing the fauna which disperse the dung and so play an important role in soil fertility. Hence there is a need to identify cost-effective methods of treating cattle with minimal impact on dung fauna. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:We used dung beetles to field bioassay the levels of dung contamination following the use of spray and pour-on formulations of deltamethrin, applied to various parts of the body of cattle in Zimbabwe. Results suggested that dung was contaminated by contact with insecticide on the body surface as the cattle defecated, and by ingestion of insecticide as the cattle licked themselves. Death of dung beetles was reduced to negligible levels by using only the spray and applying it to the legs and belly or legs alone, i.e., places where most tsetse feed. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE:The restricted applications suitable for minimising the impact on dung fauna have the collateral benefits of improving the economy and convenience of cattle treatments for tsetse control. The demonstration of collateral benefits is one of the surest ways of promoting environmentally friendly procedures.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4349886?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Glyn A Vale
John W Hargrove
Andrew Chamisa
Ian F Grant
Stephen J Torr
spellingShingle Glyn A Vale
John W Hargrove
Andrew Chamisa
Ian F Grant
Stephen J Torr
Pyrethroid treatment of cattle for tsetse control: reducing its impact on dung fauna.
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
author_facet Glyn A Vale
John W Hargrove
Andrew Chamisa
Ian F Grant
Stephen J Torr
author_sort Glyn A Vale
title Pyrethroid treatment of cattle for tsetse control: reducing its impact on dung fauna.
title_short Pyrethroid treatment of cattle for tsetse control: reducing its impact on dung fauna.
title_full Pyrethroid treatment of cattle for tsetse control: reducing its impact on dung fauna.
title_fullStr Pyrethroid treatment of cattle for tsetse control: reducing its impact on dung fauna.
title_full_unstemmed Pyrethroid treatment of cattle for tsetse control: reducing its impact on dung fauna.
title_sort pyrethroid treatment of cattle for tsetse control: reducing its impact on dung fauna.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
issn 1935-2727
1935-2735
publishDate 2015-03-01
description BACKGROUND:African trypansomiases of humans and animals can be controlled by attacking the vectors, various species of tsetse fly. Treatment of cattle with pyrethroids to kill tsetse as they feed is the most cost-effective method. However, such treatments can contaminate cattle dung, thereby killing the fauna which disperse the dung and so play an important role in soil fertility. Hence there is a need to identify cost-effective methods of treating cattle with minimal impact on dung fauna. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:We used dung beetles to field bioassay the levels of dung contamination following the use of spray and pour-on formulations of deltamethrin, applied to various parts of the body of cattle in Zimbabwe. Results suggested that dung was contaminated by contact with insecticide on the body surface as the cattle defecated, and by ingestion of insecticide as the cattle licked themselves. Death of dung beetles was reduced to negligible levels by using only the spray and applying it to the legs and belly or legs alone, i.e., places where most tsetse feed. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE:The restricted applications suitable for minimising the impact on dung fauna have the collateral benefits of improving the economy and convenience of cattle treatments for tsetse control. The demonstration of collateral benefits is one of the surest ways of promoting environmentally friendly procedures.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4349886?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT glynavale pyrethroidtreatmentofcattlefortsetsecontrolreducingitsimpactondungfauna
AT johnwhargrove pyrethroidtreatmentofcattlefortsetsecontrolreducingitsimpactondungfauna
AT andrewchamisa pyrethroidtreatmentofcattlefortsetsecontrolreducingitsimpactondungfauna
AT ianfgrant pyrethroidtreatmentofcattlefortsetsecontrolreducingitsimpactondungfauna
AT stephenjtorr pyrethroidtreatmentofcattlefortsetsecontrolreducingitsimpactondungfauna
_version_ 1725218205026222080