Contact tracing is an imperfect tool for controlling COVID-19 transmission and relies on population adherence
Evaluations of the UK’s contact tracing programme have shown that it has had limited impact on COVID-19 control. Here, the authors show that with high levels of reporting and adherence, contact tracing could reduce transmission, but it should not be used as the sole control measure.
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Publishing Group
2021-09-01
|
Series: | Nature Communications |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25531-5 |
id |
doaj-58e188cd13e54388a42dc2455aea7cce |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-58e188cd13e54388a42dc2455aea7cce2021-09-19T11:48:11ZengNature Publishing GroupNature Communications2041-17232021-09-011211810.1038/s41467-021-25531-5Contact tracing is an imperfect tool for controlling COVID-19 transmission and relies on population adherenceEmma L. Davis0Tim C. D. Lucas1Anna Borlase2Timothy M. Pollington3Sam Abbott4Diepreye Ayabina5Thomas Crellen6Joel Hellewell7Li Pi8CMMID COVID-19 Working GroupGraham F. Medley9T. Déirdre Hollingsworth10Petra Klepac11Big Data Institute, University of OxfordBig Data Institute, University of OxfordBig Data Institute, University of OxfordBig Data Institute, University of OxfordDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineBig Data Institute, University of OxfordBig Data Institute, University of OxfordDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineBig Data Institute, University of OxfordCentre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Disease & Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineBig Data Institute, University of OxfordDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineEvaluations of the UK’s contact tracing programme have shown that it has had limited impact on COVID-19 control. Here, the authors show that with high levels of reporting and adherence, contact tracing could reduce transmission, but it should not be used as the sole control measure.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25531-5 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Emma L. Davis Tim C. D. Lucas Anna Borlase Timothy M. Pollington Sam Abbott Diepreye Ayabina Thomas Crellen Joel Hellewell Li Pi CMMID COVID-19 Working Group Graham F. Medley T. Déirdre Hollingsworth Petra Klepac |
spellingShingle |
Emma L. Davis Tim C. D. Lucas Anna Borlase Timothy M. Pollington Sam Abbott Diepreye Ayabina Thomas Crellen Joel Hellewell Li Pi CMMID COVID-19 Working Group Graham F. Medley T. Déirdre Hollingsworth Petra Klepac Contact tracing is an imperfect tool for controlling COVID-19 transmission and relies on population adherence Nature Communications |
author_facet |
Emma L. Davis Tim C. D. Lucas Anna Borlase Timothy M. Pollington Sam Abbott Diepreye Ayabina Thomas Crellen Joel Hellewell Li Pi CMMID COVID-19 Working Group Graham F. Medley T. Déirdre Hollingsworth Petra Klepac |
author_sort |
Emma L. Davis |
title |
Contact tracing is an imperfect tool for controlling COVID-19 transmission and relies on population adherence |
title_short |
Contact tracing is an imperfect tool for controlling COVID-19 transmission and relies on population adherence |
title_full |
Contact tracing is an imperfect tool for controlling COVID-19 transmission and relies on population adherence |
title_fullStr |
Contact tracing is an imperfect tool for controlling COVID-19 transmission and relies on population adherence |
title_full_unstemmed |
Contact tracing is an imperfect tool for controlling COVID-19 transmission and relies on population adherence |
title_sort |
contact tracing is an imperfect tool for controlling covid-19 transmission and relies on population adherence |
publisher |
Nature Publishing Group |
series |
Nature Communications |
issn |
2041-1723 |
publishDate |
2021-09-01 |
description |
Evaluations of the UK’s contact tracing programme have shown that it has had limited impact on COVID-19 control. Here, the authors show that with high levels of reporting and adherence, contact tracing could reduce transmission, but it should not be used as the sole control measure. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25531-5 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT emmaldavis contacttracingisanimperfecttoolforcontrollingcovid19transmissionandreliesonpopulationadherence AT timcdlucas contacttracingisanimperfecttoolforcontrollingcovid19transmissionandreliesonpopulationadherence AT annaborlase contacttracingisanimperfecttoolforcontrollingcovid19transmissionandreliesonpopulationadherence AT timothympollington contacttracingisanimperfecttoolforcontrollingcovid19transmissionandreliesonpopulationadherence AT samabbott contacttracingisanimperfecttoolforcontrollingcovid19transmissionandreliesonpopulationadherence AT diepreyeayabina contacttracingisanimperfecttoolforcontrollingcovid19transmissionandreliesonpopulationadherence AT thomascrellen contacttracingisanimperfecttoolforcontrollingcovid19transmissionandreliesonpopulationadherence AT joelhellewell contacttracingisanimperfecttoolforcontrollingcovid19transmissionandreliesonpopulationadherence AT lipi contacttracingisanimperfecttoolforcontrollingcovid19transmissionandreliesonpopulationadherence AT cmmidcovid19workinggroup contacttracingisanimperfecttoolforcontrollingcovid19transmissionandreliesonpopulationadherence AT grahamfmedley contacttracingisanimperfecttoolforcontrollingcovid19transmissionandreliesonpopulationadherence AT tdeirdrehollingsworth contacttracingisanimperfecttoolforcontrollingcovid19transmissionandreliesonpopulationadherence AT petraklepac contacttracingisanimperfecttoolforcontrollingcovid19transmissionandreliesonpopulationadherence |
_version_ |
1717375509438922752 |