Green tax reforms with promotion of renewable energy sources and carbon capture and sequestration: Comparison of different alternatives
The need to decarbonize economic production processes is undeniable and has been considered by most countries worldwide. Renewable Energy Sources (RES) and Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS) technologies appear among the most promising routes to the decarbonization process. We propose an equilib...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2020-02-01
|
Series: | Energy Reports |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484719306353 |
id |
doaj-58fa60c3e2b7411997375af72f5d188b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-58fa60c3e2b7411997375af72f5d188b2020-11-25T03:30:12ZengElsevierEnergy Reports2352-48472020-02-016620625Green tax reforms with promotion of renewable energy sources and carbon capture and sequestration: Comparison of different alternativesSusana Silva0Isabel Soares1Carlos Pinho2Faculdade de Economia do Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-464- Porto, Portugal; Corresponding author.Faculdade de Economia do Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-464- Porto, PortugalGOVCOPP - Unidade de Investigação em Governança, Competitividade e Políticas Públicas DEGEIT - Departamento de Economia, Gestão, Engenharia Industrial e Turismo, Universidade de Aveiro, PortugalThe need to decarbonize economic production processes is undeniable and has been considered by most countries worldwide. Renewable Energy Sources (RES) and Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS) technologies appear among the most promising routes to the decarbonization process. We propose an equilibrium model where final-goods production uses labor and energy, and energy is generated using non-polluting RES and polluting fossil fuels. The government implements a Green Tax Reform (GTR), where it imposes a tax on emissions and uses revenues to finance subsidies to RES and support to CCS technologies. We test how results change according to the priority given to RES or to CCS support. Our results show that prioritizing RES support achieves better economic results and potentially also better environmental results. Overall, our empirical simulation demonstrates that resource substitution has a stronger benefit than decarbonizing fossil fuels. Keywords: Carbon capture and sequestration, Renewable energy sources, Environmental policy, Economyhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484719306353 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Susana Silva Isabel Soares Carlos Pinho |
spellingShingle |
Susana Silva Isabel Soares Carlos Pinho Green tax reforms with promotion of renewable energy sources and carbon capture and sequestration: Comparison of different alternatives Energy Reports |
author_facet |
Susana Silva Isabel Soares Carlos Pinho |
author_sort |
Susana Silva |
title |
Green tax reforms with promotion of renewable energy sources and carbon capture and sequestration: Comparison of different alternatives |
title_short |
Green tax reforms with promotion of renewable energy sources and carbon capture and sequestration: Comparison of different alternatives |
title_full |
Green tax reforms with promotion of renewable energy sources and carbon capture and sequestration: Comparison of different alternatives |
title_fullStr |
Green tax reforms with promotion of renewable energy sources and carbon capture and sequestration: Comparison of different alternatives |
title_full_unstemmed |
Green tax reforms with promotion of renewable energy sources and carbon capture and sequestration: Comparison of different alternatives |
title_sort |
green tax reforms with promotion of renewable energy sources and carbon capture and sequestration: comparison of different alternatives |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Energy Reports |
issn |
2352-4847 |
publishDate |
2020-02-01 |
description |
The need to decarbonize economic production processes is undeniable and has been considered by most countries worldwide. Renewable Energy Sources (RES) and Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS) technologies appear among the most promising routes to the decarbonization process. We propose an equilibrium model where final-goods production uses labor and energy, and energy is generated using non-polluting RES and polluting fossil fuels. The government implements a Green Tax Reform (GTR), where it imposes a tax on emissions and uses revenues to finance subsidies to RES and support to CCS technologies. We test how results change according to the priority given to RES or to CCS support. Our results show that prioritizing RES support achieves better economic results and potentially also better environmental results. Overall, our empirical simulation demonstrates that resource substitution has a stronger benefit than decarbonizing fossil fuels. Keywords: Carbon capture and sequestration, Renewable energy sources, Environmental policy, Economy |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484719306353 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT susanasilva greentaxreformswithpromotionofrenewableenergysourcesandcarboncaptureandsequestrationcomparisonofdifferentalternatives AT isabelsoares greentaxreformswithpromotionofrenewableenergysourcesandcarboncaptureandsequestrationcomparisonofdifferentalternatives AT carlospinho greentaxreformswithpromotionofrenewableenergysourcesandcarboncaptureandsequestrationcomparisonofdifferentalternatives |
_version_ |
1724576939477303296 |