Green tax reforms with promotion of renewable energy sources and carbon capture and sequestration: Comparison of different alternatives

The need to decarbonize economic production processes is undeniable and has been considered by most countries worldwide. Renewable Energy Sources (RES) and Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS) technologies appear among the most promising routes to the decarbonization process. We propose an equilib...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Susana Silva, Isabel Soares, Carlos Pinho
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-02-01
Series:Energy Reports
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484719306353
id doaj-58fa60c3e2b7411997375af72f5d188b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-58fa60c3e2b7411997375af72f5d188b2020-11-25T03:30:12ZengElsevierEnergy Reports2352-48472020-02-016620625Green tax reforms with promotion of renewable energy sources and carbon capture and sequestration: Comparison of different alternativesSusana Silva0Isabel Soares1Carlos Pinho2Faculdade de Economia do Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-464- Porto, Portugal; Corresponding author.Faculdade de Economia do Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-464- Porto, PortugalGOVCOPP - Unidade de Investigação em Governança, Competitividade e Políticas Públicas DEGEIT - Departamento de Economia, Gestão, Engenharia Industrial e Turismo, Universidade de Aveiro, PortugalThe need to decarbonize economic production processes is undeniable and has been considered by most countries worldwide. Renewable Energy Sources (RES) and Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS) technologies appear among the most promising routes to the decarbonization process. We propose an equilibrium model where final-goods production uses labor and energy, and energy is generated using non-polluting RES and polluting fossil fuels. The government implements a Green Tax Reform (GTR), where it imposes a tax on emissions and uses revenues to finance subsidies to RES and support to CCS technologies. We test how results change according to the priority given to RES or to CCS support. Our results show that prioritizing RES support achieves better economic results and potentially also better environmental results. Overall, our empirical simulation demonstrates that resource substitution has a stronger benefit than decarbonizing fossil fuels. Keywords: Carbon capture and sequestration, Renewable energy sources, Environmental policy, Economyhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484719306353
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Susana Silva
Isabel Soares
Carlos Pinho
spellingShingle Susana Silva
Isabel Soares
Carlos Pinho
Green tax reforms with promotion of renewable energy sources and carbon capture and sequestration: Comparison of different alternatives
Energy Reports
author_facet Susana Silva
Isabel Soares
Carlos Pinho
author_sort Susana Silva
title Green tax reforms with promotion of renewable energy sources and carbon capture and sequestration: Comparison of different alternatives
title_short Green tax reforms with promotion of renewable energy sources and carbon capture and sequestration: Comparison of different alternatives
title_full Green tax reforms with promotion of renewable energy sources and carbon capture and sequestration: Comparison of different alternatives
title_fullStr Green tax reforms with promotion of renewable energy sources and carbon capture and sequestration: Comparison of different alternatives
title_full_unstemmed Green tax reforms with promotion of renewable energy sources and carbon capture and sequestration: Comparison of different alternatives
title_sort green tax reforms with promotion of renewable energy sources and carbon capture and sequestration: comparison of different alternatives
publisher Elsevier
series Energy Reports
issn 2352-4847
publishDate 2020-02-01
description The need to decarbonize economic production processes is undeniable and has been considered by most countries worldwide. Renewable Energy Sources (RES) and Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS) technologies appear among the most promising routes to the decarbonization process. We propose an equilibrium model where final-goods production uses labor and energy, and energy is generated using non-polluting RES and polluting fossil fuels. The government implements a Green Tax Reform (GTR), where it imposes a tax on emissions and uses revenues to finance subsidies to RES and support to CCS technologies. We test how results change according to the priority given to RES or to CCS support. Our results show that prioritizing RES support achieves better economic results and potentially also better environmental results. Overall, our empirical simulation demonstrates that resource substitution has a stronger benefit than decarbonizing fossil fuels. Keywords: Carbon capture and sequestration, Renewable energy sources, Environmental policy, Economy
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484719306353
work_keys_str_mv AT susanasilva greentaxreformswithpromotionofrenewableenergysourcesandcarboncaptureandsequestrationcomparisonofdifferentalternatives
AT isabelsoares greentaxreformswithpromotionofrenewableenergysourcesandcarboncaptureandsequestrationcomparisonofdifferentalternatives
AT carlospinho greentaxreformswithpromotionofrenewableenergysourcesandcarboncaptureandsequestrationcomparisonofdifferentalternatives
_version_ 1724576939477303296