Evidence for the contribution of COMT gene Val158/108Met polymorphism (rs4680) to working memory training‐related prefrontal plasticity

Abstract Background Genetic factors have been suggested to affect the efficacy of working memory training. However, few studies have attempted to identify the relevant genes. Methods In this study, we first performed a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to identify brain regions that were specificall...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wan Zhao, Ling Huang, Yang Li, Qiumei Zhang, Xiongying Chen, Wenjin Fu, Boqi Du, Xiaoxiang Deng, Feng Ji, Yu‐Tao Xiang, Chuanyue Wang, Xiaohong Li, Qi Dong, Chuansheng Chen, Susanne M. Jaeggi, Jun Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-02-01
Series:Brain and Behavior
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1523
id doaj-592fc8a71c924d7495f9f277b5432470
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wan Zhao
Ling Huang
Yang Li
Qiumei Zhang
Xiongying Chen
Wenjin Fu
Boqi Du
Xiaoxiang Deng
Feng Ji
Yu‐Tao Xiang
Chuanyue Wang
Xiaohong Li
Qi Dong
Chuansheng Chen
Susanne M. Jaeggi
Jun Li
spellingShingle Wan Zhao
Ling Huang
Yang Li
Qiumei Zhang
Xiongying Chen
Wenjin Fu
Boqi Du
Xiaoxiang Deng
Feng Ji
Yu‐Tao Xiang
Chuanyue Wang
Xiaohong Li
Qi Dong
Chuansheng Chen
Susanne M. Jaeggi
Jun Li
Evidence for the contribution of COMT gene Val158/108Met polymorphism (rs4680) to working memory training‐related prefrontal plasticity
Brain and Behavior
COMT
fMRI
gene polymorphism
randomized controlled trial
working memory training
author_facet Wan Zhao
Ling Huang
Yang Li
Qiumei Zhang
Xiongying Chen
Wenjin Fu
Boqi Du
Xiaoxiang Deng
Feng Ji
Yu‐Tao Xiang
Chuanyue Wang
Xiaohong Li
Qi Dong
Chuansheng Chen
Susanne M. Jaeggi
Jun Li
author_sort Wan Zhao
title Evidence for the contribution of COMT gene Val158/108Met polymorphism (rs4680) to working memory training‐related prefrontal plasticity
title_short Evidence for the contribution of COMT gene Val158/108Met polymorphism (rs4680) to working memory training‐related prefrontal plasticity
title_full Evidence for the contribution of COMT gene Val158/108Met polymorphism (rs4680) to working memory training‐related prefrontal plasticity
title_fullStr Evidence for the contribution of COMT gene Val158/108Met polymorphism (rs4680) to working memory training‐related prefrontal plasticity
title_full_unstemmed Evidence for the contribution of COMT gene Val158/108Met polymorphism (rs4680) to working memory training‐related prefrontal plasticity
title_sort evidence for the contribution of comt gene val158/108met polymorphism (rs4680) to working memory training‐related prefrontal plasticity
publisher Wiley
series Brain and Behavior
issn 2162-3279
publishDate 2020-02-01
description Abstract Background Genetic factors have been suggested to affect the efficacy of working memory training. However, few studies have attempted to identify the relevant genes. Methods In this study, we first performed a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to identify brain regions that were specifically affected by working memory training. Sixty undergraduate students were randomly assigned to either the adaptive training group (N = 30) or the active control group (N = 30). Both groups were trained for 20 sessions during 4 weeks and received fMRI scans before and after the training. Afterward, we combined the data from the 30 participants in the RCT study who received adaptive training with data from 71 additional participants who also received the same adaptive training but were not part of the RCT study (total N = 101) to test the contribution of the COMT Val158/108Met polymorphism to the interindividual difference in the training effect within the identified brain regions. Results In the RCT study, we found that the adaptive training significantly decreased brain activation in the left prefrontal cortex (TFCE‐FWE corrected p = .030). In the genetic study, we found that compared with the Val allele homozygotes, the Met allele carriers' brain activation decreased more after the training at the left prefrontal cortex (TFCE‐FWE corrected p = .025). Conclusions This study provided evidence for the neural effect of a visual–spatial span training and suggested that genetic factors such as the COMT Val158/108Met polymorphism may have to be considered in future studies of such training.
topic COMT
fMRI
gene polymorphism
randomized controlled trial
working memory training
url https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1523
work_keys_str_mv AT wanzhao evidenceforthecontributionofcomtgeneval158108metpolymorphismrs4680toworkingmemorytrainingrelatedprefrontalplasticity
AT linghuang evidenceforthecontributionofcomtgeneval158108metpolymorphismrs4680toworkingmemorytrainingrelatedprefrontalplasticity
AT yangli evidenceforthecontributionofcomtgeneval158108metpolymorphismrs4680toworkingmemorytrainingrelatedprefrontalplasticity
AT qiumeizhang evidenceforthecontributionofcomtgeneval158108metpolymorphismrs4680toworkingmemorytrainingrelatedprefrontalplasticity
AT xiongyingchen evidenceforthecontributionofcomtgeneval158108metpolymorphismrs4680toworkingmemorytrainingrelatedprefrontalplasticity
AT wenjinfu evidenceforthecontributionofcomtgeneval158108metpolymorphismrs4680toworkingmemorytrainingrelatedprefrontalplasticity
AT boqidu evidenceforthecontributionofcomtgeneval158108metpolymorphismrs4680toworkingmemorytrainingrelatedprefrontalplasticity
AT xiaoxiangdeng evidenceforthecontributionofcomtgeneval158108metpolymorphismrs4680toworkingmemorytrainingrelatedprefrontalplasticity
AT fengji evidenceforthecontributionofcomtgeneval158108metpolymorphismrs4680toworkingmemorytrainingrelatedprefrontalplasticity
AT yutaoxiang evidenceforthecontributionofcomtgeneval158108metpolymorphismrs4680toworkingmemorytrainingrelatedprefrontalplasticity
AT chuanyuewang evidenceforthecontributionofcomtgeneval158108metpolymorphismrs4680toworkingmemorytrainingrelatedprefrontalplasticity
AT xiaohongli evidenceforthecontributionofcomtgeneval158108metpolymorphismrs4680toworkingmemorytrainingrelatedprefrontalplasticity
AT qidong evidenceforthecontributionofcomtgeneval158108metpolymorphismrs4680toworkingmemorytrainingrelatedprefrontalplasticity
AT chuanshengchen evidenceforthecontributionofcomtgeneval158108metpolymorphismrs4680toworkingmemorytrainingrelatedprefrontalplasticity
AT susannemjaeggi evidenceforthecontributionofcomtgeneval158108metpolymorphismrs4680toworkingmemorytrainingrelatedprefrontalplasticity
AT junli evidenceforthecontributionofcomtgeneval158108metpolymorphismrs4680toworkingmemorytrainingrelatedprefrontalplasticity
_version_ 1724606058946625536
spelling doaj-592fc8a71c924d7495f9f277b54324702020-11-25T03:23:29ZengWileyBrain and Behavior2162-32792020-02-01102n/an/a10.1002/brb3.1523Evidence for the contribution of COMT gene Val158/108Met polymorphism (rs4680) to working memory training‐related prefrontal plasticityWan Zhao0Ling Huang1Yang Li2Qiumei Zhang3Xiongying Chen4Wenjin Fu5Boqi Du6Xiaoxiang Deng7Feng Ji8Yu‐Tao Xiang9Chuanyue Wang10Xiaohong Li11Qi Dong12Chuansheng Chen13Susanne M. Jaeggi14Jun Li15State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research Beijing Normal University Beijing ChinaState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research Beijing Normal University Beijing ChinaState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research Beijing Normal University Beijing ChinaState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research Beijing Normal University Beijing ChinaThe National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders & Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders Center of Schizophrenia Beijing Anding Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing ChinaState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research Beijing Normal University Beijing ChinaState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research Beijing Normal University Beijing ChinaState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research Beijing Normal University Beijing ChinaSchool of Mental Health Jining Medical University Jining ChinaFaculty of Health Sciences University of Macau Taipa ChinaThe National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders & Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders Center of Schizophrenia Beijing Anding Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing ChinaThe National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders & Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders Center of Schizophrenia Beijing Anding Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing ChinaState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research Beijing Normal University Beijing ChinaDepartment of Psychological Science University of California Irvine CA USASchool of Education & Department of Cognitive Sciences University of California Irvine CA USAState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research Beijing Normal University Beijing ChinaAbstract Background Genetic factors have been suggested to affect the efficacy of working memory training. However, few studies have attempted to identify the relevant genes. Methods In this study, we first performed a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to identify brain regions that were specifically affected by working memory training. Sixty undergraduate students were randomly assigned to either the adaptive training group (N = 30) or the active control group (N = 30). Both groups were trained for 20 sessions during 4 weeks and received fMRI scans before and after the training. Afterward, we combined the data from the 30 participants in the RCT study who received adaptive training with data from 71 additional participants who also received the same adaptive training but were not part of the RCT study (total N = 101) to test the contribution of the COMT Val158/108Met polymorphism to the interindividual difference in the training effect within the identified brain regions. Results In the RCT study, we found that the adaptive training significantly decreased brain activation in the left prefrontal cortex (TFCE‐FWE corrected p = .030). In the genetic study, we found that compared with the Val allele homozygotes, the Met allele carriers' brain activation decreased more after the training at the left prefrontal cortex (TFCE‐FWE corrected p = .025). Conclusions This study provided evidence for the neural effect of a visual–spatial span training and suggested that genetic factors such as the COMT Val158/108Met polymorphism may have to be considered in future studies of such training.https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1523COMTfMRIgene polymorphismrandomized controlled trialworking memory training