Increased knowledge makes a difference! – general practitioners’ experiences of pictorial information about subclinical atherosclerosis for primary prevention: an interview study from the VIPVIZA trial

Objectives To explore how pictorial information on subclinical atherosclerosis affects GPs’ perception of patient cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, their communication with patients, and GPs’ attitude to the treatment of CVD risk factors. Design, setting and subjects Fifteen individual interviews w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anna Bengtsson, Kristina Lindvall, Margareta Norberg, Eva Fhärm
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2021-01-01
Series:Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2021.1882083
id doaj-59443453bb59480299f7a3a285e554c1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-59443453bb59480299f7a3a285e554c12021-03-18T15:12:45ZengTaylor & Francis GroupScandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care0281-34321502-77242021-01-01391778410.1080/02813432.2021.18820831882083Increased knowledge makes a difference! – general practitioners’ experiences of pictorial information about subclinical atherosclerosis for primary prevention: an interview study from the VIPVIZA trialAnna Bengtsson0Kristina Lindvall1Margareta Norberg2Eva Fhärm3Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå UniversityDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå UniversityDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå UniversityDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå UniversityObjectives To explore how pictorial information on subclinical atherosclerosis affects GPs’ perception of patient cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, their communication with patients, and GPs’ attitude to the treatment of CVD risk factors. Design, setting and subjects Fifteen individual interviews were conducted between March 2014 and December 2016, with GPs who had received pictorial information regarding their patients’ subclinical atherosclerosis. The pictorial information was also received by the patients together with written information regarding atherosclerosis and CVD risk prior to the appointment with their GP. The interviews were recorded, transcribed and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results Three categories were identified in the analysis. Increased knowledge makes a difference: When patients had more in-depth knowledge regarding atherosclerosis, the consultation became more patient-centered and moved towards shared decision making. This is real, not just a number: GPs described their risk assessment and the patient’s risk perception as more accurate with pictorial information about subclinical atherosclerosis. How to deal with the result – A passive to active approach: Some GPs acted promptly on the pictorial information while others took no action. Conclusion and implications Pictorial information regarding patients’ subclinical atherosclerosis affected GPs’ assessment of CVD risk. The communication shifted towards shared decision-making although the GPs’ attitude to the result and treatment of CVD risk factors varied. Informing patients about examination results, both in writing and pictures, prior to a consultation can facilitate shared decision making and enhance preventive measures. Trial registration https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01849575.KEY POINTS Providing pictorial information about carotid ultrasound results and information regarding atherosclerosis to GPs and patients affects primary prevention: •Informing patients about examination results prior to a consultation can be useful in clinical practice to enhance preventive measures •GPs experienced that increased patient knowledge resulted in a more patient-centered consultation and improved shared decision-making •GPs described their risk assessment and patients’ risk perception as more accurate with pictorial information about subclinical atherosclerosishttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2021.1882083cardiovascular diseaseconsultation processfamily practicepictorial informationqualitative researchrisk
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anna Bengtsson
Kristina Lindvall
Margareta Norberg
Eva Fhärm
spellingShingle Anna Bengtsson
Kristina Lindvall
Margareta Norberg
Eva Fhärm
Increased knowledge makes a difference! – general practitioners’ experiences of pictorial information about subclinical atherosclerosis for primary prevention: an interview study from the VIPVIZA trial
Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care
cardiovascular disease
consultation process
family practice
pictorial information
qualitative research
risk
author_facet Anna Bengtsson
Kristina Lindvall
Margareta Norberg
Eva Fhärm
author_sort Anna Bengtsson
title Increased knowledge makes a difference! – general practitioners’ experiences of pictorial information about subclinical atherosclerosis for primary prevention: an interview study from the VIPVIZA trial
title_short Increased knowledge makes a difference! – general practitioners’ experiences of pictorial information about subclinical atherosclerosis for primary prevention: an interview study from the VIPVIZA trial
title_full Increased knowledge makes a difference! – general practitioners’ experiences of pictorial information about subclinical atherosclerosis for primary prevention: an interview study from the VIPVIZA trial
title_fullStr Increased knowledge makes a difference! – general practitioners’ experiences of pictorial information about subclinical atherosclerosis for primary prevention: an interview study from the VIPVIZA trial
title_full_unstemmed Increased knowledge makes a difference! – general practitioners’ experiences of pictorial information about subclinical atherosclerosis for primary prevention: an interview study from the VIPVIZA trial
title_sort increased knowledge makes a difference! – general practitioners’ experiences of pictorial information about subclinical atherosclerosis for primary prevention: an interview study from the vipviza trial
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care
issn 0281-3432
1502-7724
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Objectives To explore how pictorial information on subclinical atherosclerosis affects GPs’ perception of patient cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, their communication with patients, and GPs’ attitude to the treatment of CVD risk factors. Design, setting and subjects Fifteen individual interviews were conducted between March 2014 and December 2016, with GPs who had received pictorial information regarding their patients’ subclinical atherosclerosis. The pictorial information was also received by the patients together with written information regarding atherosclerosis and CVD risk prior to the appointment with their GP. The interviews were recorded, transcribed and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results Three categories were identified in the analysis. Increased knowledge makes a difference: When patients had more in-depth knowledge regarding atherosclerosis, the consultation became more patient-centered and moved towards shared decision making. This is real, not just a number: GPs described their risk assessment and the patient’s risk perception as more accurate with pictorial information about subclinical atherosclerosis. How to deal with the result – A passive to active approach: Some GPs acted promptly on the pictorial information while others took no action. Conclusion and implications Pictorial information regarding patients’ subclinical atherosclerosis affected GPs’ assessment of CVD risk. The communication shifted towards shared decision-making although the GPs’ attitude to the result and treatment of CVD risk factors varied. Informing patients about examination results, both in writing and pictures, prior to a consultation can facilitate shared decision making and enhance preventive measures. Trial registration https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01849575.KEY POINTS Providing pictorial information about carotid ultrasound results and information regarding atherosclerosis to GPs and patients affects primary prevention: •Informing patients about examination results prior to a consultation can be useful in clinical practice to enhance preventive measures •GPs experienced that increased patient knowledge resulted in a more patient-centered consultation and improved shared decision-making •GPs described their risk assessment and patients’ risk perception as more accurate with pictorial information about subclinical atherosclerosis
topic cardiovascular disease
consultation process
family practice
pictorial information
qualitative research
risk
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2021.1882083
work_keys_str_mv AT annabengtsson increasedknowledgemakesadifferencegeneralpractitionersexperiencesofpictorialinformationaboutsubclinicalatherosclerosisforprimarypreventionaninterviewstudyfromthevipvizatrial
AT kristinalindvall increasedknowledgemakesadifferencegeneralpractitionersexperiencesofpictorialinformationaboutsubclinicalatherosclerosisforprimarypreventionaninterviewstudyfromthevipvizatrial
AT margaretanorberg increasedknowledgemakesadifferencegeneralpractitionersexperiencesofpictorialinformationaboutsubclinicalatherosclerosisforprimarypreventionaninterviewstudyfromthevipvizatrial
AT evafharm increasedknowledgemakesadifferencegeneralpractitionersexperiencesofpictorialinformationaboutsubclinicalatherosclerosisforprimarypreventionaninterviewstudyfromthevipvizatrial
_version_ 1724215774212521984