Cell Electrosensitization Exists Only in Certain Electroporation Buffers.

Electroporation-induced cell sensitization was described as the occurrence of a delayed hypersensitivity to electric pulses caused by pretreating cells with electric pulses. It was achieved by increasing the duration of the electroporation treatment at the same cumulative energy input. It could be e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Janja Dermol, Olga N Pakhomova, Andrei G Pakhomov, Damijan Miklavčič
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4959715?pdf=render
id doaj-5952efe560d24f9da9089303cce0bb7c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5952efe560d24f9da9089303cce0bb7c2020-11-25T00:40:51ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01117e015943410.1371/journal.pone.0159434Cell Electrosensitization Exists Only in Certain Electroporation Buffers.Janja DermolOlga N PakhomovaAndrei G PakhomovDamijan MiklavčičElectroporation-induced cell sensitization was described as the occurrence of a delayed hypersensitivity to electric pulses caused by pretreating cells with electric pulses. It was achieved by increasing the duration of the electroporation treatment at the same cumulative energy input. It could be exploited in electroporation-based treatments such as electrochemotherapy and tissue ablation with irreversible electroporation. The mechanisms responsible for cell sensitization, however, have not yet been identified. We investigated cell sensitization dynamics in five different electroporation buffers. We split a pulse train into two trains varying the delay between them and measured the propidium uptake by fluorescence microscopy. By fitting the first-order model to the experimental results, we determined the uptake due to each train (i.e. the first and the second) and the corresponding resealing constant. Cell sensitization was observed in the growth medium but not in other tested buffers. The effect of pulse repetition frequency, cell size change, cytoskeleton disruption and calcium influx do not adequately explain cell sensitization. Based on our results, we can conclude that cell sensitization is a sum of several processes and is buffer dependent. Further research is needed to determine its generality and to identify underlying mechanisms.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4959715?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Janja Dermol
Olga N Pakhomova
Andrei G Pakhomov
Damijan Miklavčič
spellingShingle Janja Dermol
Olga N Pakhomova
Andrei G Pakhomov
Damijan Miklavčič
Cell Electrosensitization Exists Only in Certain Electroporation Buffers.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Janja Dermol
Olga N Pakhomova
Andrei G Pakhomov
Damijan Miklavčič
author_sort Janja Dermol
title Cell Electrosensitization Exists Only in Certain Electroporation Buffers.
title_short Cell Electrosensitization Exists Only in Certain Electroporation Buffers.
title_full Cell Electrosensitization Exists Only in Certain Electroporation Buffers.
title_fullStr Cell Electrosensitization Exists Only in Certain Electroporation Buffers.
title_full_unstemmed Cell Electrosensitization Exists Only in Certain Electroporation Buffers.
title_sort cell electrosensitization exists only in certain electroporation buffers.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Electroporation-induced cell sensitization was described as the occurrence of a delayed hypersensitivity to electric pulses caused by pretreating cells with electric pulses. It was achieved by increasing the duration of the electroporation treatment at the same cumulative energy input. It could be exploited in electroporation-based treatments such as electrochemotherapy and tissue ablation with irreversible electroporation. The mechanisms responsible for cell sensitization, however, have not yet been identified. We investigated cell sensitization dynamics in five different electroporation buffers. We split a pulse train into two trains varying the delay between them and measured the propidium uptake by fluorescence microscopy. By fitting the first-order model to the experimental results, we determined the uptake due to each train (i.e. the first and the second) and the corresponding resealing constant. Cell sensitization was observed in the growth medium but not in other tested buffers. The effect of pulse repetition frequency, cell size change, cytoskeleton disruption and calcium influx do not adequately explain cell sensitization. Based on our results, we can conclude that cell sensitization is a sum of several processes and is buffer dependent. Further research is needed to determine its generality and to identify underlying mechanisms.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4959715?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT janjadermol cellelectrosensitizationexistsonlyincertainelectroporationbuffers
AT olganpakhomova cellelectrosensitizationexistsonlyincertainelectroporationbuffers
AT andreigpakhomov cellelectrosensitizationexistsonlyincertainelectroporationbuffers
AT damijanmiklavcic cellelectrosensitizationexistsonlyincertainelectroporationbuffers
_version_ 1725288371906936832