Research Data Services in Academic Libraries: Data Intensive Roles for the Future?

Objectives: The primary objectives of this study are to gauge the various levels of Research Data Service academic libraries provide based on demographic factors, gauging RDS growth since 2011, and what obstacles may prevent expansion or growth of services. Methods: Survey of academic institution...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carol Tenopir, Dane Hughes, Suzie Allard, Mike Frame, Ben Birch, Lynn Baird, Robert Sandusky, Madison Langseth, Andrew Lundeen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Massachusetts Medical School, Lamar Soutter Library 2015-12-01
Series:Journal of eScience Librarianship
Subjects:
Online Access:http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/jeslib/vol4/iss2/4/
id doaj-596b8dc5df204e5cae826a836fb49b1a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-596b8dc5df204e5cae826a836fb49b1a2020-11-24T22:20:07ZengUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School, Lamar Soutter LibraryJournal of eScience Librarianship2161-39742015-12-0142e108510.7191/jeslib.2015.1085Research Data Services in Academic Libraries: Data Intensive Roles for the Future?Carol Tenopir0Dane Hughes1Suzie Allard2Mike Frame3Ben Birch4Lynn Baird5Robert Sandusky6Madison Langseth7Andrew Lundeen8University of Tennessee - KnoxvilleUniversity of Tennessee - KnoxvilleUniversity of Tennessee - KnoxvilleUnited States Geological SurveyUniversity of Tennessee - KnoxvilleUniversity of IdahoUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoUnited States Geological SurveyMichigan State UniversityObjectives: The primary objectives of this study are to gauge the various levels of Research Data Service academic libraries provide based on demographic factors, gauging RDS growth since 2011, and what obstacles may prevent expansion or growth of services. Methods: Survey of academic institutions through stratified random sample of ACRL library directors across the U.S. and Canada. Frequencies and chi-square analysis were applied, with some responses grouped into broader categories for analysis. Results: Minimal to no change for what services were offered between survey years, and interviews with library directors were conducted to help explain this lack of change. Conclusion: Further analysis is forthcoming for a librarians study to help explain possible discrepancies in organizational objectives and librarian sentiments of RDS.http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/jeslib/vol4/iss2/4/research data servicedata managementlibraries and data sets
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Carol Tenopir
Dane Hughes
Suzie Allard
Mike Frame
Ben Birch
Lynn Baird
Robert Sandusky
Madison Langseth
Andrew Lundeen
spellingShingle Carol Tenopir
Dane Hughes
Suzie Allard
Mike Frame
Ben Birch
Lynn Baird
Robert Sandusky
Madison Langseth
Andrew Lundeen
Research Data Services in Academic Libraries: Data Intensive Roles for the Future?
Journal of eScience Librarianship
research data service
data management
libraries and data sets
author_facet Carol Tenopir
Dane Hughes
Suzie Allard
Mike Frame
Ben Birch
Lynn Baird
Robert Sandusky
Madison Langseth
Andrew Lundeen
author_sort Carol Tenopir
title Research Data Services in Academic Libraries: Data Intensive Roles for the Future?
title_short Research Data Services in Academic Libraries: Data Intensive Roles for the Future?
title_full Research Data Services in Academic Libraries: Data Intensive Roles for the Future?
title_fullStr Research Data Services in Academic Libraries: Data Intensive Roles for the Future?
title_full_unstemmed Research Data Services in Academic Libraries: Data Intensive Roles for the Future?
title_sort research data services in academic libraries: data intensive roles for the future?
publisher University of Massachusetts Medical School, Lamar Soutter Library
series Journal of eScience Librarianship
issn 2161-3974
publishDate 2015-12-01
description Objectives: The primary objectives of this study are to gauge the various levels of Research Data Service academic libraries provide based on demographic factors, gauging RDS growth since 2011, and what obstacles may prevent expansion or growth of services. Methods: Survey of academic institutions through stratified random sample of ACRL library directors across the U.S. and Canada. Frequencies and chi-square analysis were applied, with some responses grouped into broader categories for analysis. Results: Minimal to no change for what services were offered between survey years, and interviews with library directors were conducted to help explain this lack of change. Conclusion: Further analysis is forthcoming for a librarians study to help explain possible discrepancies in organizational objectives and librarian sentiments of RDS.
topic research data service
data management
libraries and data sets
url http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/jeslib/vol4/iss2/4/
work_keys_str_mv AT caroltenopir researchdataservicesinacademiclibrariesdataintensiverolesforthefuture
AT danehughes researchdataservicesinacademiclibrariesdataintensiverolesforthefuture
AT suzieallard researchdataservicesinacademiclibrariesdataintensiverolesforthefuture
AT mikeframe researchdataservicesinacademiclibrariesdataintensiverolesforthefuture
AT benbirch researchdataservicesinacademiclibrariesdataintensiverolesforthefuture
AT lynnbaird researchdataservicesinacademiclibrariesdataintensiverolesforthefuture
AT robertsandusky researchdataservicesinacademiclibrariesdataintensiverolesforthefuture
AT madisonlangseth researchdataservicesinacademiclibrariesdataintensiverolesforthefuture
AT andrewlundeen researchdataservicesinacademiclibrariesdataintensiverolesforthefuture
_version_ 1725776780497780736