Risk Factors for Early Dislocation after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Matched Case-Control Study

Purpose. To evaluate risk factors for early dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods. Records of 175 cases with dislocation during hospitalisation after THA and 651 controls without dislocation were reviewed. Cases and controls were matched for age, gender, body mass index cla...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marcel Dudda, A Gueleryuez, E Gautier, A Busato, C Roeder
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2010-08-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901001800209
id doaj-59abe6e0608345b985733e971d8cdd9e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-59abe6e0608345b985733e971d8cdd9e2020-11-25T03:15:36ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery2309-49902010-08-011810.1177/230949901001800209Risk Factors for Early Dislocation after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Matched Case-Control StudyMarcel Dudda0A Gueleryuez1E Gautier2A Busato3C Roeder4 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inselspital Berne, University of Berne, Switzerland Orthopaedic Department, Hopital cantonal Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland Orthopaedic Department, Hopital cantonal Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland Maurice E Mueller Research Centre in Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute for Evaluative Research in Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Berne, Switzerland Maurice E Mueller Research Centre in Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute for Evaluative Research in Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Berne, SwitzerlandPurpose. To evaluate risk factors for early dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods. Records of 175 cases with dislocation during hospitalisation after THA and 651 controls without dislocation were reviewed. Cases and controls were matched for age, gender, body mass index classification, primary diagnosis, cup design, hospital, and year of intervention. Version and inclination of the acetabular component and version of the femoral component were assessed intra- and post-operatively. Various risk factors were analysed, including surgical approach, cup positioning, combined cup and stem positioning, and femoral head size. Results. The posterior approach was 6 fold more prone to dislocation (odds ratio [OR]=6.3, p<0.018) than the anterolateral or straight lateral approach. With regard to combined cup and stem positioning, the acceptable position was at significantly higher risk of dislocation than the ideal position (OR=2.59, p=0.033). Larger femoral head sizes were associated with significantly lower risk of dislocation (OR=0.84, p=0.02). Conclusion. Surgical approach, combined cup and stem positioning, and femoral head size were significant risk factors for dislocation during hospitalisation.https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901001800209
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marcel Dudda
A Gueleryuez
E Gautier
A Busato
C Roeder
spellingShingle Marcel Dudda
A Gueleryuez
E Gautier
A Busato
C Roeder
Risk Factors for Early Dislocation after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Matched Case-Control Study
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
author_facet Marcel Dudda
A Gueleryuez
E Gautier
A Busato
C Roeder
author_sort Marcel Dudda
title Risk Factors for Early Dislocation after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Matched Case-Control Study
title_short Risk Factors for Early Dislocation after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Matched Case-Control Study
title_full Risk Factors for Early Dislocation after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Matched Case-Control Study
title_fullStr Risk Factors for Early Dislocation after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Matched Case-Control Study
title_full_unstemmed Risk Factors for Early Dislocation after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Matched Case-Control Study
title_sort risk factors for early dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a matched case-control study
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
issn 2309-4990
publishDate 2010-08-01
description Purpose. To evaluate risk factors for early dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods. Records of 175 cases with dislocation during hospitalisation after THA and 651 controls without dislocation were reviewed. Cases and controls were matched for age, gender, body mass index classification, primary diagnosis, cup design, hospital, and year of intervention. Version and inclination of the acetabular component and version of the femoral component were assessed intra- and post-operatively. Various risk factors were analysed, including surgical approach, cup positioning, combined cup and stem positioning, and femoral head size. Results. The posterior approach was 6 fold more prone to dislocation (odds ratio [OR]=6.3, p<0.018) than the anterolateral or straight lateral approach. With regard to combined cup and stem positioning, the acceptable position was at significantly higher risk of dislocation than the ideal position (OR=2.59, p=0.033). Larger femoral head sizes were associated with significantly lower risk of dislocation (OR=0.84, p=0.02). Conclusion. Surgical approach, combined cup and stem positioning, and femoral head size were significant risk factors for dislocation during hospitalisation.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901001800209
work_keys_str_mv AT marceldudda riskfactorsforearlydislocationaftertotalhiparthroplastyamatchedcasecontrolstudy
AT agueleryuez riskfactorsforearlydislocationaftertotalhiparthroplastyamatchedcasecontrolstudy
AT egautier riskfactorsforearlydislocationaftertotalhiparthroplastyamatchedcasecontrolstudy
AT abusato riskfactorsforearlydislocationaftertotalhiparthroplastyamatchedcasecontrolstudy
AT croeder riskfactorsforearlydislocationaftertotalhiparthroplastyamatchedcasecontrolstudy
_version_ 1724638461414080512