Politiser et dépolitiser la métropole : dimensions et modes de politisation de l’intercommunalité bordelaise

The article concerns politicisation of French urban inter-municipality and to question one of the topos of the literature on this subject, according to which this institutional level would be condemned to depoliticisation. In order to do this, it first reflects on the notion of politicisation, often...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gilles Pinson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Métropoles 2020-01-01
Series:Métropoles
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/metropoles/7118
id doaj-59efbc9f75d04165a9ebd114d6495f02
record_format Article
spelling doaj-59efbc9f75d04165a9ebd114d6495f022020-11-25T01:36:57ZengMétropolesMétropoles1957-77882020-01-012510.4000/metropoles.7118Politiser et dépolitiser la métropole : dimensions et modes de politisation de l’intercommunalité bordelaiseGilles PinsonThe article concerns politicisation of French urban inter-municipality and to question one of the topos of the literature on this subject, according to which this institutional level would be condemned to depoliticisation. In order to do this, it first reflects on the notion of politicisation, often poorly defined despite its omnipresence in the political science literature in general and the relationship between politics and administration at the local level in particular. The term politicisation actually implies processes that vary widely in their forms and purposes. To put these multiple forms of politicisation in order, three dimensions and four modes of politicisation are distinguished. The survey that inspired this typology and allowed it to be tested focused on the Bordeaux inter-municipality - - the Bordeaux urban community that became a metropolis in early 2015 - and on a period from 1995 to 2015 marked by four changes of president. This survey revealed very distinct ways for metropolitan political leaders to control recruitment and mobility within the inter-municipal administration, to embed inter-municipal debates and decisions in ideological and partisan opposition patterns and to mobilise the administration in the service of a public policy programme and more generally, a territorial project. The twenty years or so of inter-municipal history in Bordeaux shows some contrasting situations, oscillating mainly around two modes of politicisation: the politicisation of control and transformational politicisation.http://journals.openedition.org/metropoles/7118metropolitan governanceintermunicipal cooperationpoliticizationdepoliticizationmetropolitan bureaucracyBordeaux (France)
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gilles Pinson
spellingShingle Gilles Pinson
Politiser et dépolitiser la métropole : dimensions et modes de politisation de l’intercommunalité bordelaise
Métropoles
metropolitan governance
intermunicipal cooperation
politicization
depoliticization
metropolitan bureaucracy
Bordeaux (France)
author_facet Gilles Pinson
author_sort Gilles Pinson
title Politiser et dépolitiser la métropole : dimensions et modes de politisation de l’intercommunalité bordelaise
title_short Politiser et dépolitiser la métropole : dimensions et modes de politisation de l’intercommunalité bordelaise
title_full Politiser et dépolitiser la métropole : dimensions et modes de politisation de l’intercommunalité bordelaise
title_fullStr Politiser et dépolitiser la métropole : dimensions et modes de politisation de l’intercommunalité bordelaise
title_full_unstemmed Politiser et dépolitiser la métropole : dimensions et modes de politisation de l’intercommunalité bordelaise
title_sort politiser et dépolitiser la métropole : dimensions et modes de politisation de l’intercommunalité bordelaise
publisher Métropoles
series Métropoles
issn 1957-7788
publishDate 2020-01-01
description The article concerns politicisation of French urban inter-municipality and to question one of the topos of the literature on this subject, according to which this institutional level would be condemned to depoliticisation. In order to do this, it first reflects on the notion of politicisation, often poorly defined despite its omnipresence in the political science literature in general and the relationship between politics and administration at the local level in particular. The term politicisation actually implies processes that vary widely in their forms and purposes. To put these multiple forms of politicisation in order, three dimensions and four modes of politicisation are distinguished. The survey that inspired this typology and allowed it to be tested focused on the Bordeaux inter-municipality - - the Bordeaux urban community that became a metropolis in early 2015 - and on a period from 1995 to 2015 marked by four changes of president. This survey revealed very distinct ways for metropolitan political leaders to control recruitment and mobility within the inter-municipal administration, to embed inter-municipal debates and decisions in ideological and partisan opposition patterns and to mobilise the administration in the service of a public policy programme and more generally, a territorial project. The twenty years or so of inter-municipal history in Bordeaux shows some contrasting situations, oscillating mainly around two modes of politicisation: the politicisation of control and transformational politicisation.
topic metropolitan governance
intermunicipal cooperation
politicization
depoliticization
metropolitan bureaucracy
Bordeaux (France)
url http://journals.openedition.org/metropoles/7118
work_keys_str_mv AT gillespinson politiseretdepolitiserlametropoledimensionsetmodesdepolitisationdelintercommunalitebordelaise
_version_ 1725060590558248960