Performance and Intestinal Profiles of Tegal Duck Fed Ration Supplemented with Prebiotics

This research was aimed to determine the effects of prebiotics on performance and gastrointestinal profiles of Tegal ducks. One hundred two-month-old male Tegal ducks were distributed into 5 treatment groups; R0= control; R1= FOS; R2= MOS; R3= Inulin; and R4= natural prebiotic (water hyacinth/Eichho...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: N. Iriyanti, B. Hartoyo, S. Suhermiyati
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IPB University 2018-04-01
Series:Tropical Animal Science Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jli.journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/tasj/article/view/20946
id doaj-5a00f35391d241b5a63b94e5ab1f6197
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5a00f35391d241b5a63b94e5ab1f61972020-11-25T02:10:12ZengIPB UniversityTropical Animal Science Journal2615-787X2615-790X2018-04-0141110.5398/tasj.2018.41.1.1513840Performance and Intestinal Profiles of Tegal Duck Fed Ration Supplemented with PrebioticsN. Iriyanti0B. Hartoyo1S. Suhermiyati2Animal Nutrition Laboratory, Faculty of Animal Science, Jenderal Soedirman UniversityAnimal Nutrition Laboratory, Faculty of Animal Science, Jenderal Soedirman UniversityAnimal Nutrition Laboratory, Faculty of Animal Science, Jenderal Soedirman UniversityThis research was aimed to determine the effects of prebiotics on performance and gastrointestinal profiles of Tegal ducks. One hundred two-month-old male Tegal ducks were distributed into 5 treatment groups; R0= control; R1= FOS; R2= MOS; R3= Inulin; and R4= natural prebiotic (water hyacinth/Eichhornia crassipes). The prebiotics were given at 0.2% of the total feed (w/w). The observed variables were performances and gastrointestinal profiles. This study used a completely randomized design and continued with honestly significant difference test. Performance (live weight, body weight gain, and feed intake) and intestinal profile (percentage weights of intestine, gizzard, crop, and pancreas) of ducks were not significantly affected by prebiotic supplementation in feed. FOS prebiotic and natural prebiotic from water hyacinth showed increased (P<0.05) the percentage of carcass and cecum weight compared to the other treatments. In conclusion, the use of different prebiotics resulted in relatively similar performances and digestive tract profiles except the percentage of carcass and cecum weight that increased by 4.5% and 36.67%, respectively, with the supplementation of either FOS or water hyacinth.https://jli.journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/tasj/article/view/20946prebioticTegal duckperformancegastrointestinal profilewater hyacinth
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author N. Iriyanti
B. Hartoyo
S. Suhermiyati
spellingShingle N. Iriyanti
B. Hartoyo
S. Suhermiyati
Performance and Intestinal Profiles of Tegal Duck Fed Ration Supplemented with Prebiotics
Tropical Animal Science Journal
prebiotic
Tegal duck
performance
gastrointestinal profile
water hyacinth
author_facet N. Iriyanti
B. Hartoyo
S. Suhermiyati
author_sort N. Iriyanti
title Performance and Intestinal Profiles of Tegal Duck Fed Ration Supplemented with Prebiotics
title_short Performance and Intestinal Profiles of Tegal Duck Fed Ration Supplemented with Prebiotics
title_full Performance and Intestinal Profiles of Tegal Duck Fed Ration Supplemented with Prebiotics
title_fullStr Performance and Intestinal Profiles of Tegal Duck Fed Ration Supplemented with Prebiotics
title_full_unstemmed Performance and Intestinal Profiles of Tegal Duck Fed Ration Supplemented with Prebiotics
title_sort performance and intestinal profiles of tegal duck fed ration supplemented with prebiotics
publisher IPB University
series Tropical Animal Science Journal
issn 2615-787X
2615-790X
publishDate 2018-04-01
description This research was aimed to determine the effects of prebiotics on performance and gastrointestinal profiles of Tegal ducks. One hundred two-month-old male Tegal ducks were distributed into 5 treatment groups; R0= control; R1= FOS; R2= MOS; R3= Inulin; and R4= natural prebiotic (water hyacinth/Eichhornia crassipes). The prebiotics were given at 0.2% of the total feed (w/w). The observed variables were performances and gastrointestinal profiles. This study used a completely randomized design and continued with honestly significant difference test. Performance (live weight, body weight gain, and feed intake) and intestinal profile (percentage weights of intestine, gizzard, crop, and pancreas) of ducks were not significantly affected by prebiotic supplementation in feed. FOS prebiotic and natural prebiotic from water hyacinth showed increased (P<0.05) the percentage of carcass and cecum weight compared to the other treatments. In conclusion, the use of different prebiotics resulted in relatively similar performances and digestive tract profiles except the percentage of carcass and cecum weight that increased by 4.5% and 36.67%, respectively, with the supplementation of either FOS or water hyacinth.
topic prebiotic
Tegal duck
performance
gastrointestinal profile
water hyacinth
url https://jli.journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/tasj/article/view/20946
work_keys_str_mv AT niriyanti performanceandintestinalprofilesoftegalduckfedrationsupplementedwithprebiotics
AT bhartoyo performanceandintestinalprofilesoftegalduckfedrationsupplementedwithprebiotics
AT ssuhermiyati performanceandintestinalprofilesoftegalduckfedrationsupplementedwithprebiotics
_version_ 1724920232129069056