Are glucocorticoids or NSAIDs effective in idiopathic feline urinary tract disease signs than no treatment or placebo?
PICO question In cats with idiopathic feline urinary tract disease (FLUTD), are glucocorticoid or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs more effective than placebo or no treatment in reducing clinical signs attributable to cystitis? Clinical bottom line Category of research question...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
RCVS Knowledge
2021-08-01
|
Series: | Veterinary Evidence |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://veterinaryevidence.org/index.php/ve/article/view/439 |
id |
doaj-5a1b7d14582d4d9cb432374d9f70fee0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Lesca Monica Sofyan |
spellingShingle |
Lesca Monica Sofyan Are glucocorticoids or NSAIDs effective in idiopathic feline urinary tract disease signs than no treatment or placebo? Veterinary Evidence feline idiopathic cystitis fic feline lower urinary tract disease flutd prednisolone nsaids glucocorticoids meloxicam |
author_facet |
Lesca Monica Sofyan |
author_sort |
Lesca Monica Sofyan |
title |
Are glucocorticoids or NSAIDs effective in idiopathic feline urinary tract disease signs than no treatment or placebo? |
title_short |
Are glucocorticoids or NSAIDs effective in idiopathic feline urinary tract disease signs than no treatment or placebo? |
title_full |
Are glucocorticoids or NSAIDs effective in idiopathic feline urinary tract disease signs than no treatment or placebo? |
title_fullStr |
Are glucocorticoids or NSAIDs effective in idiopathic feline urinary tract disease signs than no treatment or placebo? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Are glucocorticoids or NSAIDs effective in idiopathic feline urinary tract disease signs than no treatment or placebo? |
title_sort |
are glucocorticoids or nsaids effective in idiopathic feline urinary tract disease signs than no treatment or placebo? |
publisher |
RCVS Knowledge |
series |
Veterinary Evidence |
issn |
2396-9776 |
publishDate |
2021-08-01 |
description |
PICO question
In cats with idiopathic feline urinary tract disease (FLUTD), are glucocorticoid or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs more effective than placebo or no treatment in reducing clinical signs attributable to cystitis?
Clinical bottom line
Category of research question
Treatment
The number and type of study designs reviewed
Three randomised controlled trials have examined the efficacy of prednisolone or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in reducing the clinical signs of feline lower urinary tract disease compared to a placebo whilst one retrospective cohort study compared the reoccurrence of FLUTD in cats treated with meloxicam and without meloxicam
Strength of evidence
Weak
Outcomes reported
One small controlled trial compared prednisolone to a placebo and found no clinical differences in dysuria, microscopic haematuria, and occult blood for cats diagnosed with idiopathic non-obstructive feline lower urinary tract disease (FLUTD) hospitalised for 10 days. The study however had a very small sample size. Furthermore, the external validity of the study to similar patients discharged to their home environment is unclear.
The second small controlled trial compared meloxicam to a placebo in cats diagnosed with obstructive FLUTD. Statistical analysis was applied to determine if there were significant differences in voiding behaviour, general demeanour, haematuria, food intake and abdominal pain as assessed by the veterinarians in charge during hospitalisation and owners at discharge. No statistically significant differences (P>0.05) were calculated between the two treatment groups based on the owner questionnaire and veterinarian assessment but small samples in each treatment probably limited statistical power.
The third small controlled trial compared the reoccurrence of feline idiopathic cystitis (FIC), related clinical signs and recurrent urinary obstruction in cats at 10 days, 1, 2 and 6 months after discharge when treated with phenoxybenzamine and alprazolam, with or without the addition of meloxicam. No statistically significant differences were found in the reoccurrence of obstructed or non-obstructed FIC for cats treated with either meloxicam or no meloxicam. However, full details of each intervention group were not sufficient to assess for balance of prognostic factors, subjective scoring of clinical signs was not detailed, and the study was underpowered for the actual obstruction rates reported.
The fourth paper was a retrospective cohort study that examined the association of different treatment factors with 30 days reobstruction. The study found no significant association between the use of meloxicam and the rate of reobstruction but a number of confounders were present
Conclusion
Three small randomised controlled trials and a single retrospective cohort study failed to find a significant association between the use of glucocorticoids or NSAIDs with severity of FLUTD clinical signs or risk of reobstruction. Clinical outcome measures were heterogeneous and studies were significantly underpowered and/or at risk for bias and/or confounding. There is insufficient evidence to recommend the use of either drug category in decreasing time to resolution or severity of clinical signs in cases of idiopathic FLUTD or FIC
How to apply this evidence in practice
The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources.
Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care. |
topic |
feline idiopathic cystitis fic feline lower urinary tract disease flutd prednisolone nsaids glucocorticoids meloxicam |
url |
https://veterinaryevidence.org/index.php/ve/article/view/439 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lescamonicasofyan areglucocorticoidsornsaidseffectiveinidiopathicfelineurinarytractdiseasesignsthannotreatmentorplacebo |
_version_ |
1716843262769102848 |
spelling |
doaj-5a1b7d14582d4d9cb432374d9f70fee02021-10-05T10:40:26ZengRCVS KnowledgeVeterinary Evidence2396-97762021-08-016310.18849/ve.v6i3.439439Are glucocorticoids or NSAIDs effective in idiopathic feline urinary tract disease signs than no treatment or placebo?Lesca Monica Sofyan0Doctor of Veterinary Medicine StudentPICO question In cats with idiopathic feline urinary tract disease (FLUTD), are glucocorticoid or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs more effective than placebo or no treatment in reducing clinical signs attributable to cystitis? Clinical bottom line Category of research question Treatment The number and type of study designs reviewed Three randomised controlled trials have examined the efficacy of prednisolone or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in reducing the clinical signs of feline lower urinary tract disease compared to a placebo whilst one retrospective cohort study compared the reoccurrence of FLUTD in cats treated with meloxicam and without meloxicam Strength of evidence Weak Outcomes reported One small controlled trial compared prednisolone to a placebo and found no clinical differences in dysuria, microscopic haematuria, and occult blood for cats diagnosed with idiopathic non-obstructive feline lower urinary tract disease (FLUTD) hospitalised for 10 days. The study however had a very small sample size. Furthermore, the external validity of the study to similar patients discharged to their home environment is unclear. The second small controlled trial compared meloxicam to a placebo in cats diagnosed with obstructive FLUTD. Statistical analysis was applied to determine if there were significant differences in voiding behaviour, general demeanour, haematuria, food intake and abdominal pain as assessed by the veterinarians in charge during hospitalisation and owners at discharge. No statistically significant differences (P>0.05) were calculated between the two treatment groups based on the owner questionnaire and veterinarian assessment but small samples in each treatment probably limited statistical power. The third small controlled trial compared the reoccurrence of feline idiopathic cystitis (FIC), related clinical signs and recurrent urinary obstruction in cats at 10 days, 1, 2 and 6 months after discharge when treated with phenoxybenzamine and alprazolam, with or without the addition of meloxicam. No statistically significant differences were found in the reoccurrence of obstructed or non-obstructed FIC for cats treated with either meloxicam or no meloxicam. However, full details of each intervention group were not sufficient to assess for balance of prognostic factors, subjective scoring of clinical signs was not detailed, and the study was underpowered for the actual obstruction rates reported. The fourth paper was a retrospective cohort study that examined the association of different treatment factors with 30 days reobstruction. The study found no significant association between the use of meloxicam and the rate of reobstruction but a number of confounders were present Conclusion Three small randomised controlled trials and a single retrospective cohort study failed to find a significant association between the use of glucocorticoids or NSAIDs with severity of FLUTD clinical signs or risk of reobstruction. Clinical outcome measures were heterogeneous and studies were significantly underpowered and/or at risk for bias and/or confounding. There is insufficient evidence to recommend the use of either drug category in decreasing time to resolution or severity of clinical signs in cases of idiopathic FLUTD or FIC How to apply this evidence in practice The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources. Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.https://veterinaryevidence.org/index.php/ve/article/view/439feline idiopathic cystitisficfeline lower urinary tract diseaseflutdprednisolonensaidsglucocorticoidsmeloxicam |